Schmidt breaking, up 177 - 169. These pockets are wide.
11am start- TV Stream Today: All Matches- Schmidt vs Eckert- Efren vs Appleton
- Thread starter DP.News
- Start date
Schmidt breaking, up 177 - 169. These pockets are wide.
Schmidt breaking, up 191 - 169.
I presume it's a race to 200? If so it looks like it's bye-bye-Irene...
For what it's worth, no matter how this pans out, it's a win-win for the sport...two gentlemen competing for the title.
The only loser is DP (loss of fans from being robbed this experience)...although they'll call it a gain ($$$ from costly but faulty streams).
Schmidt wins 200 - 169. Efren just didn't bust the balls open well enough. Good match and pretty good stream. Fingers & Wilkie were both good announcers.
They did have a very poorly designed website and a convoluted purchase process. Once I got the damn pop off blocker turned off and signed out of the extra machine I was able to sign in fine and then had the stream up with no interruption for all three matches.
Thumbs Up
Congrats to John Schmidt & the USA,
A job very well done Sir.
Congrats to John Schmidt & the USA,
A job very well done Sir.
Last edited:
Thanks much for the updates.
I'm super happy for John Schmidt.
Feel kinda bad for Efren.....so close to another World Championship in another discipline!
Here’s the “box score,” inning by inning, on the championship match, with Schmidt defeating Reyes 200 – 169.
(The notation “R3”, for example, means Reyes’ third inning. Scores are shown with Schmidt first and Reyes second.):
R1: opening safety
S1: safe
R2: made 1 (a very thin cut on the rail), played safe [0 – 1]
S2: safe
R3: ran 4 then missed a short but off-angle combination [0 – 5]
S3: ran 107 then missed a thin break shot [107 – 5]
R4: ran 19 then took an intentional foul [107 – 23]
S4: intentional foul [106 – 23]
R5: missed a bank
S5: ran 10 then played safe [116 – 23]
R6: safe
S6: safe, but knocked a ball out
R7: scratched trying to go 3 rails for shape [116 – 22]
S7: intentional foul [115 – 22]
R8: safe
S8: missed a long, thin cut
R9: ran 32 then missed a long, straight-in shot [115 – 54]
S9: ran 10 then missed a long, straight-in 2-ball [125 – 54]
R10: ran 112 then missed a long shot up table from the foot rail [125 – 166]
S10: ran 21 then missed the 3/11 combo [146 – 166]
R11: ran 3 then missed [146 – 169]
S11: ran 3 but failed to get position for the break, played safe [149 – 169]
R12: safe
S12: safe
R13: missed a carom shot out of the pack
S13: ran 51 and out [200 – 169]
(The notation “R3”, for example, means Reyes’ third inning. Scores are shown with Schmidt first and Reyes second.):
R1: opening safety
S1: safe
R2: made 1 (a very thin cut on the rail), played safe [0 – 1]
S2: safe
R3: ran 4 then missed a short but off-angle combination [0 – 5]
S3: ran 107 then missed a thin break shot [107 – 5]
R4: ran 19 then took an intentional foul [107 – 23]
S4: intentional foul [106 – 23]
R5: missed a bank
S5: ran 10 then played safe [116 – 23]
R6: safe
S6: safe, but knocked a ball out
R7: scratched trying to go 3 rails for shape [116 – 22]
S7: intentional foul [115 – 22]
R8: safe
S8: missed a long, thin cut
R9: ran 32 then missed a long, straight-in shot [115 – 54]
S9: ran 10 then missed a long, straight-in 2-ball [125 – 54]
R10: ran 112 then missed a long shot up table from the foot rail [125 – 166]
S10: ran 21 then missed the 3/11 combo [146 – 166]
R11: ran 3 then missed [146 – 169]
S11: ran 3 but failed to get position for the break, played safe [149 – 169]
R12: safe
S12: safe
R13: missed a carom shot out of the pack
S13: ran 51 and out [200 – 169]
Whoa so they both had runs over 100 in the same match? That's pretty rare I'd say.
Efren can now sit comfortably in the history books. From what's been posted here, he gave Jonathan Smith an incredibly good game. You're right, two runs of 100+ in a 14.1 World Championship (it's a farce but whatever)...this is going to be the match between two legends that will become folklore.
Kudos to Jonathan Smith for a well deserved win!
Kudos to Efren Reyes for a great performance!
This is history in the making...good night Irene.
