While you make a respectable point, my understanding is that straight pool tournaments run multiple frames (best of three), not one uninterrupted session. Similarly, a century break in snooker also forces the opponent to have no further visits to the table, but you are sweating your bloody arse off to produce that century in match play! I feel that turning over a frame in 14.1 and snooker with one or two visits is legitimately earned.I have the utmost respect for straight pool as a game, but as top pros can make runs of 200 points then it's not a good test of skill. Both players need to have fair opportunities at the table and this is what 10-ball provides. Winner-breaks 10-ball a race to, say, 10 is IMO a better test of professionals' skills than straight pool to 200 points. Making one bad shot (or not good enough break shot) and losing the whole match on it is too much of a punishment.