3 Past The Headstring rule is BS

So I take it....no one has complained about these new rules.....players OR viewers.......right?

Well, you are.
For the wrong reasons.
https://youtu.be/SYmsptO3Q7c?t=1514
Go watch that and you'll figure out why they stopped the tweety break.
You think it takes a lot to learn to do that ?
Alcano mastered it DURING the tournament .
He almost didn't make it past the first round.
 
Last edited:
So I take it....no one has complained about these new rules.....players OR viewers.......right?

Nice deflection as always. Can't ever answer a simple question. But I'm more than happy to answer yours and dig your hole a little deeper for you.

It's pool, people complain about everything. But when we deal with facts and see that

- Over 128 players (check)
- No issues with payouts (check)
- Not one case of an amateur beating a top pro (check)
- The best players are in the final four (check)

What is there really to complain about? Oh I don't get to bunt at the break and have a cosmo layout every time? Big deal!
 
Nice deflection as always. Can't ever answer a simple question. But I'm more than happy to answer yours and dig your hole a little deeper for you.

It's pool, people complain about everything. But when we deal with facts and see that

- Over 128 players (check)
- No issues with payouts (check)
- Not one case of an amateur beating a top pro (check)
- The best players are in the final four (check)

What is there really to complain about? Oh I don't get to bunt at the break and have a cosmo layout every time? Big deal!

There USE to be over 200 players, and even 256 at times....BEFORE these stupid rule changes! Or are you blind to the last 40 years of this event....and only this stupid year counts in your book!
 
Last edited:
There USE to be over 200 players, and even 256 at times....BEFORE these stupid rule changes! Or are you blind to the last 40 years of this event....and only this stupid year counts in your book!

Oh you mean when there was even more dead money?

The same dead money players you seem to be so against?
 
There USE to be over 200 players, and even 256 at times....BEFORE these stupid rule changes! Or are you blind to the last 40 years of this event....and only this stupid year counts in your book!

You're blaming the rules changes for lower participation?
Not the bouncing checks and high entry fee?

When did they ever have more than 164 participants at the US Open ?
 
With this event being the longest running, most prestigious event on American soil.....THESE ARE THE RULES I'D LIKE TO SEE THEM PLAYING BY!

A) Race to 21.

B) 10 game lead on your opponent equals early win by KO..NO COME FROM BEHIND UNLESS THE PLAYER FELL 10 BEHIND BECAUSE THE OPPOSITE RAN A 10 PACK. In which case after the run out player finally misses, his/her opponent shall have one attempt to equal or exceed the 10+ pack run, failure to do so is loss of match.

C) All balls must be racked in the same pattern, 1 ball on the spot, no rack AID, triangle only. 30 second rack and accept, or opposing player shall be awarded ONE penalty win as a violation for extending the racking time, in which the person racking shall be granted a new 30 seconds in which to complete racking the balls. 3 consecutive fouls is lost of match.

D) 9 ball on the break counts anytime, but must be spotted back into the game. Breaker keeps the win, BUT if the breaker falls to also pocket the 9 ball to win the game and the OPPONENT pockets the 9 to end the inning, then that player shall be awarded ONE win during the game as well. If the breaker successfully pockets the 9 on the break and subsequently as well to end the game, that shall constitute TWO wins in ONE game.

E) After the initial start of each game, each player shall have ONE lifeline/push out opportunity at anytime during the in play game, and can call to use such lifeline at any time. The opposing player shall either accept the push out, or pass the shot opportunity back to the current player. If how ever the opposing player accepts the push out, that player may as well choose to elect to use their lifeline/push out as well. Once a player has exhausted their lifeline, there are no more to use.

F) All matches have a maximum duration of 3 hours. If neither player has won in a race to 21 pryor to the maximize match time limit, then the winner of the match shall be decided by who ever is a head at the end of the 3 hour match limit. If the players are involved in a game that can end up a tie at the finish and does so, then a ONE game tie breaker will decide the winner after the time limit has expired. With a 30 minute recess between match rounds, all matches will start on time....and END on time. There shall be NO double elimination matches, once a player has lost a match....they are free to leave as their involvement in the field of play is no longer required. Under my rules, the US Open would be concluded by the end of the 4th day running 4 rounds of play in the first 2 days with the use of 16 tables. Every 3 1/2 hours 16 players would be eliminated from play, 64 players in the first day of play alone...149 players entered this year.

G) Shot clocks should be available at each table set to 30 seconds. Either player can activate the shot clock, BUT....once activated neither player can ask for a time extension, penalty for running out the shot clock will be ONE win awarded to the opposing player and a new 30 seconds shall be set and started again....same shooter at the table. 3 consecutive time violations shall be lost of match.
 
Oh you mean when there was even more dead money?

The same dead money players you seem to be so against?

I'm not against dead money players at all, what I AM against is them crying so much about how UNFAIR pool tournament's are to them....that they threaten to boycott their entry fees if the rules aren't changed to give them what they feel is a better chance to compete.....what's next...... is the US Open 9 ball championship is going to have to cut the races down to a race to 3 to decide the winner of a match?...just to keep the dead money players putting up the majority of the prize money? You want 256 players in this event....keep the current rules and make it a race to 2 for the win....the flood gates will open to every dead money players there is....ROTFLMAO
 
Someone doesn't realize how bad of an action the US Open is.
High entree fee and low payout.
And they raised that entree fee after checks bounced the year before.
 
I absolutely love this break format from a spectator's point of view. No soft and easy breaks but winner breaks so big runs are still possible. Love it.
 
I absolutely love this break format from a spectator's point of view. No soft and easy breaks but winner breaks so big runs are still possible. Love it.

"You're a dummy! I bet you can't break for squat you dummy dum-dum. Why don't you go practice ur break??"

-RKC
 
I'm not against dead money players at all, what I AM against is them crying so much about how UNFAIR pool tournament's are to them....that they threaten to boycott their entry fees if the rules aren't changed to give them what they feel is a better chance to compete.....what's next...... is the US Open 9 ball championship is going to have to cut the races down to a race to 3 to decide the winner of a match?...just to keep the dead money players putting up the majority of the prize money? You want 256 players in this event....keep the current rules and make it a race to 2 for the win....the flood gates will open to every dead money players there is....ROTFLMAO

Who threatened to boycott their entry fee unless the rules were changed?

Who?

Specifically who?

Please. Enlighten us.
 
Oh btw for those who missed the last match between SVB and Shaw. SVB was perfect and had zero illegal breaks.

Go figure.
 
Oh btw for those who missed the last match between SVB and Shaw. SVB was perfect and had zero illegal breaks.

Go figure.
And he averaged more than two balls made per break, which is an incredible stat.

Money won is twice as sweet as money earned
 
Oh btw for those who missed the last match between SVB and Shaw. SVB was perfect and had zero illegal breaks.

Go figure.

But relatively few break and runs, which made for lots of interesting back and forth. Which in a competition is what I think people would want to see.

Shane really won the match with push-out strategy. Every time Shaw gave it back to SVB, he made a great shot, and every time Shaw took a whack at it, he played it poorly.
 
But relatively few break and runs, which made for lots of interesting back and forth. Which in a competition is what I think people would want to see.

Shane really won the match with push-out strategy. Every time Shaw gave it back to SVB, he made a great shot, and every time Shaw took a whack at it, he played it poorly.
Shane had 4 B&Rs, 5 if you count the 9 on the break. That's a pretty good average.

Money won is twice as sweet as money earned
 
Back
Top