If this Darren ties the score with Keith Bennett, I'm taking a swan dive off of Key Bridge.
Yes. Personally I don't think very much of those that manipulate the rack, but was surprised to hear how much time Daz puts into it. Studies the joe tucker stuff too.
I hope Corteza doesn't going looking for that same bridge, he may regret forgetting to mark his game, he's in a tight one.
I realize it is not cost effective in our little pool world, but I have always thought in a high-profile tournamaent, there should *always* be neutral rackers. ALWAYS!
It's like bowlers racking up their own pins. It's ridiculous.
Rigging the rack is like playing poker with a marked deck.
Anyone know the rule on how long you have to mark a game? If he forgets to mark a game and wins the next rack, can he mark two games on the wire?
Anyone know the rule on how long you have to mark a game? If he forgets to mark a game and wins the next rack, can he mark two games on the wire?
But, I just can't abide.
A lot of people think I'm a square because I think like that. To me, it's almost cheating. Technically it's not because the tournaments allow it. But, I just can't abide.
I think the TD should do it. That's not fair that he loses a game because he's caught up in the heat of the moment. Somebody should do this for him.
And my dear friends, Karl Boyles v. Johnny Archer is coming up at 6:30. We Americans know how to rack 'em, too.This should be very interesting! :grin:
I'm not sure, I was wondering if someone in the crowd informed before he broke the next game, what would happen then.
Not sure who's next on the stream at 6:30, but Neils is warming up.
If Karl plays like he has over the last 5 hours, Johnny will roast him.
Well, if Van-Van was my man and I was sitting in the audience, I would not hesitate to walk right up to him on the rail and tell him to move the damn bead.![]()