626 is it legit?

Get_A_Grip

Truth Will Set You Free
Silver Member
The unedited video exists, per js team, and it will speak for itself.
IT IS WHAT IT IS!
The only one in question is, John Schmidt. That is where all of the problems reside.
He must exhibit the actual unedited video.
TIME waits for no one! May 28, 2019 was not too soon.
Actually, he doesn't need to exhibit the unedited video to the public. The 626 high run record was already accepted by the BCA, Predator, and the pool community at large (quite a few pros have already congratulated JS). It's only a few doubters that think that there is no record unless they themselves see the unedited video. From what I know of JS, I bet that he is laughing his @ss off about these threads and how bent out of shape Danny and a few others are about his record and them not being able to scrutinize it.
 

haystj

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
From what I know of JS, I bet that he is laughing his @ss off about these threads and how bent out of shape Danny and a few others are about his record and them not being able to scrutinize it.
Definitely.

Many on here too.
 

lfigueroa

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Care to share why?

You listed HOF players earlier.

Is that the bar?

No, I do not care to share.

I did mention HOF players. I think a couple of those guys reviewing the video would have greatly enhanced the credibility of the BCA’s certification. As it sits right now it kinda ranks up there with the “Certificate of Authenticity” they give you if you buy a painting at a cruise ship auction.

Lou Figueroa
 

haystj

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Thanks for the reply, Lou.
I respect all opinions (except crazy nut bags and you’re not one of them)
 

haystj

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Too late hasteytj, the nuts already out of the bag. U may be right, we might be crazy, but it keeps us from going where ur headed(insane). Yeah, I’ll go anywhere I want to go. radar
Finally!

He makes a semi age appropriate analogy.

I guess there is value in the second kick of a mule!

Thanks Jimmie
 

Danny Harriman

One of the best in 14.1
Silver Member
No, I do not care to share.

I did mention HOF players. I think a couple of those guys reviewing the video would have greatly enhanced the credibility of the BCA’s certification. As it sits right now it kinda ranks up there with the “Certificate of Authenticity” they give you if you buy a painting at a cruise ship auction.

Lou Figueroa
Howdy Lou, I read bca's mission on their webseat' - could not help notice over the yrs. bca change their definition of 'Pocket Billiards' to 'pool'? When ever it was - that was the beginning of the end for the corrupt bca/hollywood crowd in my view. The term pool does blur the lines of what Mosconi called Pocket Billiards. I am solid at seeing details (blessing and curse) - I appreciate your input on the bca's decision to change the Pocket Billiard nomenclature to that of 'pool' (I believe your a warrior for truth) so thanks in advance. The term 'pool' does not receive MY blessing :-/ so that is why I'm asking.
 
Last edited:

haystj

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
Howdy Lou, I read bca's mission on their webseat' - could not help notice over the yrs. bca change their definition of 'Pocket Billiards' to 'pool'? When ever it was - that was the beginning of the end for the corrupt bca/hollywood crowd in my view. The term pool does blur the lines of what Mosconi called Pocket Billiards. I am solid at seeing details (blessing and curse) - I appreciate your input on the bca's decision to change the Pocket Billiard nomenclature to pool (I believe your a warrior for truth) so thanks in advance. The term pool does not receive MY blessing :-/ so that is why I'm asking.
A curse? Not so much.

You clearly miss some details.

Read the bolded text in the quote.
 
Last edited:

haystj

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
It appears that some need no details.
STINK STANK STUNK
IF IT isn’t stinking
Stir IT up
IF IT is still not stinking
CHUG IT while stirring
Matters not to whom anyone writes here, ur 2 cents are just as important info as theirs is.
So, have at IT
NOTHING TO LOSE

Bro- why you so mad?

My comment wasn’t directed at the radar account.

Chill and relax- you’re getting really worked up and I’m starting to worry about you my friend.
 

xXGEARXx

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
It appears that some need no details.
STINK STANK STUNK
IF IT isn’t stinking
Stir IT up
IF IT is still not stinking
CHUG IT while stirring
Matters not to whom anyone writes here, ur 2 cents are just as important info as theirs is.
So, have at IT
NOTHING TO LOSE
You do have a way with words. Like, "STINK STANK STUNK" and "IF IT is still not stinking". Also, let's not forget this one: "ur 2 cents". Simply beautiful grammar and it REALLY touches me deep inside - somewhere? Are you related to Justnum?
 

Danny Harriman

One of the best in 14.1
Silver Member
I choose to wait for review of the run by someone else.

Lou Figueroa
I choose also to wait as well, but as long as the bca and j.s. continue to hide the evidence - (no copies for sale to open public in unedited disc form) their journalistic integrity will be seriously questioned.
 
Last edited:

haystj

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
I did mention HOF players. I think a couple of those guys reviewing the video would have greatly enhanced the credibility of the BCA’s certification. As it sits right now it kinda ranks up there with the “Certificate of Authenticity” they give you if you buy a painting at a cruise ship auction.

Lou Figueroa
This is one of the posts that led me to believe Lou would respect Varner’s opinion.

Maybe this was a confusing post?
 

lfigueroa

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
This is one of the posts that led me to believe Lou would respect Varner’s opinion.

Maybe this was a confusing post?

The post is not confusing and speaks for itself -- if, way back when, the BCA had had a couple of HOF 14.1 players review unedited video of the run it would have made their certification more credible.

Lou Figueroa
pretty clear
 
Top