This is exactly my thoughts as it relates to the topic of discussion here.
The one question I have, going a bit deeper is;
Assuming a player, could be a current one or from the past, if we took that player and put him on the easiest possible equipment. The easiest combination of cloth, pockets, table size, best cue, shaft. The easiest of everything, which we really don’t have defined, but let’s say we figured that out.
How many balls could that player run as the absolute maximum?
Yes in theory he should play forever.
But since this is reality(in abstract sense) how many balls can someone run until they get a skid, bad break, funny roll, take their eye off the ball(happened today to Jayson)
What’s the maximum run possible by a person not challenged by equipment.
At some point human nature will happen and something will cause a miss.
Is it 2000? 1000? Right now after 80 years of effort it’s 832.
I think 1000 is possible for sure, 1250 seems like a huge number. That’s just my thought.
I’m not making a separate thread. But what’s your thought? And what’s the equipment look like?
Fatboy<——-has more questions than answers![]()
But it’s just like how mosconi played the game on that kind of pocketfor sure. especially compared to what they usually play on nowadays. it's quite a contrast
Filler is another guy with alien-like concentration and determination. Plus, he has crazy skills and youth on his side. It would take someone with all those attributes to break 1,000. Give Filler a week with big pockets and 760 cloth and I wouldn't bet against him. Recall he ran a 285 at the DCC on a conventional Diamond table.i personally think filler is the best straight pool player in the world. jmho. but filler would have to change his break strategy to be able to achieve a serious high run. less boom-boom, as chamat would say. consistently getting high, fairly steep break shots hit with medium-hard pace seem to be the most important factor
He’s had all these years to try it himselfFiller is another guy with alien-like concentration and determination. Plus, he has crazy skills and youth on his side. It would take someone with all those attributes to break 1,000. Give Filler a week with big pockets and 760 cloth and I wouldn't bet against him. Recall he ran a 285 at the DCC on a conventional Diamond table.
But it’s just like how mosconi played the game on that kind of pocket
It possible I could eat 800 ice crème’s and be ok.It’s like the guy who made 5000 free throws in a row. It takes someone with otherworldly concentration skills.
I can’t even walk 800 steps without stumbling.
If you're running 50 racks who's shooting back?Great feat but i still think runs IN COMPETITION carry far more weight. Runs over 200 in a tournament are tougher than shooting with no one shooting back. Don't get me wrong, this is still mighty impressive display.
I’m here for it.1000 is possible and maybe jayson will get it at some point. i doubt anyone would bet he could get there in this session. too many things has to click, it's just low probability. he looked done after the 280 yesterday
i personally think filler is the best straight pool player in the world. jmho. but filler would have to change his break strategy to be able to achieve a serious high run. less boom-boom, as chamat would say. consistently getting high, fairly steep break shots hit with medium-hard pace seem to be the most important factor
Especially a skid. Could a skid, funny roll due to cloth or miscue always be prevented? E.g. by always cleaning the cloth and balls in between racks... I doubt it.This is exactly my thoughts as it relates to the topic of discussion here.
The one question I have, going a bit deeper is;
Assuming a player, could be a current one or from the past, if we took that player and put him on the easiest possible equipment. The easiest combination of cloth, pockets, table size, best cue, shaft. The easiest of everything, which we really don’t have defined, but let’s say we figured that out.
How many balls could that player run as the absolute maximum?
Yes in theory he should play forever.
But since this is reality(in abstract sense) how many balls can someone run until they get a skid, bad break, funny roll, take their eye off the ball(happened today to Jayson)
What’s the maximum run possible by a person not challenged by equipment.
At some point human nature will happen and something will cause a miss.
Is it 2000? 1000? Right now after 80 years of effort it’s 832.
I think 1000 is possible for sure, 1250 seems like a huge number. That’s just my thought.
I’m not making a separate thread. But what’s your thought? And what’s the equipment look like?
Fatboy<——-has more questions than answers![]()
Yes you are right/ I think a skid is what would end any marathon run most likely. They happen on every cloth, chalk, ball etc.Especially a skid. Could a skid, funny roll due to cloth or miscue always be prevented? E.g. by always cleaning the cloth and balls in between racks... I doubt it.
Like an high run in anything some luck is needed. And the "chance of being so unlucky that kills the run" slowly increases with the number of shots (though it stays the same per individual shot, kind of).
It possible I could eat 800 ice crème’s
Unless there is a near 6 figure $ incentive for him to reach it, I really don’t know why Filler or anyone else would put themselves through such a mentally and physically exhausting challenge.He’s had all these years to try it himself
Doesn’t seem that interested
Can’t give him a week on big pockets if he doesn’t show up
WTF. If there's some monster in the chair you don't think the quality of play might just be a tad different??????? Missing in these deals is no penalty. just start over. Lot of risky shots taken just because of that. Still stronger than cat piss but i'd never put these and real competition matches in the same category.If you're running 50 racks who's shooting back?![]()
I don't think there needs to be six figure incentive. These guys fly all over the country and play all week for 10K. I think a 10k incentive should be enough. Plus, all that stroking / practice can only help their game. The last time Shaw did the challenge, he steamrolled through the Turning Stone a few days later. All that high-pressure practice gotta put someone in dead punch. Besides, I'm thinking holding the world record must be worth something to sponsors.Unless there is a near 6 figure $ incentive for him to reach it, I really don’t know why Filler or anyone else would put themselves through such a mentally and physically exhausting challenge.
Also, attempting this for an extended period on overly forgiving sized pockets may not be very conducive to preparing them for their pro tournaments that are played on 4” to 4-1/4” pockets.
Personally, I would be more interested in seeing what Shaw, Filler or anyone else could produce for a high run on a standard 4-1/2 inch pocket Diamond table.
For a player of Shaw’s caliber to be attempting this on such forgiving pocket specs is like a top touring pro golfer trying to set the all time one round low score course record on a 6000 yard wide open municipal golf course - it would mean very little.
Filler is another guy with alien-like concentration and determination. Plus, he has crazy skills and youth on his side. It would take someone with all those attributes to break 1,000. Give Filler a week with big pockets and 760 cloth and I wouldn't bet against him. Recall he ran a 285 at the DCC on a conventional Diamond table.
Or in thousandths of an inch, at 4.900" they are .400" thou bigger than a 4.500" pocket.the pocket size is more easily measured not in inches but in percentages of a foot, as in about half a foot wide![]()
Right so people can stop saying give filler a weekUnless there is a near 6 figure $ incentive for him to reach it, I really don’t know why Filler or anyone else would put themselves through such a mentally and physically exhausting challenge.
Also, attempting this for an extended period on overly forgiving sized pockets may not be very conducive to preparing them for their pro tournaments that are played on 4” to 4-1/4” pockets.
Personally, I would be more interested in seeing what Shaw, Filler or anyone else could produce for a high run on a standard 4-1/2 inch pocket Diamond table.
For a player of Shaw’s caliber to be attempting this on such forgiving pocket specs is like a top touring pro golfer trying to set the all time one round low score course record on a 6000 yard wide open municipal golf course with super easy pin positions - it would mean very little.