I’m certain we have all about the wrong ball before because we didn’t see the correct ball on the table. Or played shape for the wrong ball. Occupational hazard. Lol. It happens.I think it actually may have happened once, but I'm not certain. I have certainly seen it happen on occasion over the years, regardless of which ball set was in use. That said, I don't reckon this will be a difficult transition for the players.
Amusingly, Bob Jewett was watching Allen Hopkins warming up for his first match at the 2021 US Open and, rack after rack, Allen was shooting the five-ball before the four ball. Bob couldn't help himself and approached him, asking him if he realized that the purple ball was the five ball, not the four ball. Allen's answer, of course, was "no".
Of course, Allen is an old timer who had probably never played with, or even seen, a purple five ball before.
Short rack bank is a great great game. And scratching in that game is a monster price to pay. Wow it’s expensive/ enjoy CowboyI only play 14/1, One Pocket, trying to lean Short Rack Banks, so colors of balls is no big deal.
Pink 4b has been around FIFTY years??? Don't recall seeing one til mid/late 90's at the earliest.While I absolutely agree with that if you're using purple is must be on the 4 and 12 balls, I'm just going to say that the "few years" of the pink 4 is actually half a century now, so it's not new or uncommon.
Still just prefer a tweaking of shades for contrast than outright replacement.
HushThey should do away with the colors altogether and just let the sponsors put their logos on the balls. The blacked out nine ball already looks like a Predator logo.
What's traditional in pro pool is, more and more, going by the wayside. I'm just not sure it's a problem, although I fully understand why some AZB members feel otherwise.
The switch to Simonis cloth some 40 years ago was bemoaned by some as making the game unrecognizable. Some questioned whether a player should be permitted to break with a different cue. Isn't one supposed to mater the game using a single cue, they asked? Then there was Camel colored cloth. Are you kidding? Some seemingly couldn't handle it, for pool, they said, shouldn't look like that. For me, the introduction of the jump cue made rotation games almost unrecognizable. Since when is pool played through the air?
All these points aside, we've always had to adapt to changes in the game and its equipment, and we've always managed. There's no reason to think this will change.
I think we all want the same thing - standardization of the game, its equipment and its rules. I think we'll get there one day, but it may take quite a while.
Nice post. Points are well taken.I don't think the issue some members have is necessarily due to fear or resistance to change, but rather wholly unnecessary change. Change to improve the game or performance in the game is generally accepted and often even embraced. Change for the sake of change or worse, for corporate greed on the other hand, tends to rub folks the wrong way. The purple 5 ball is a great example of this. What is the point of making an existing purple ball not purple and using that color for a different one?
I’m a big fan of traditionWhat's traditional in pro pool is, more and more, going by the wayside. I'm just not sure it's a problem, although I fully understand why some AZB members feel otherwise.
The switch to Simonis cloth some 40 years ago was bemoaned by some as making the game unrecognizable. Some questioned whether a player should be permitted to break with a different cue. Isn't one supposed to mater the game using a single cue, they asked? Then there was Camel colored cloth. Are you kidding? Some seemingly couldn't handle it, for pool, they said, shouldn't look like that. For me, the introduction of the jump cue made rotation games almost unrecognizable. Since when is pool played through the air?
All these points aside, we've always had to adapt to changes in the game and its equipment, and we've always managed. There's no reason to think this will change.
I think we all want the same thing - standardization of the game, its equipment and its rules. I think we'll get there one day, but it may take quite a while.
The thing is, for the most part, there was a reason and argument for those changes, even if it wasn't our preference.What's traditional in pro pool is, more and more, going by the wayside. I'm just not sure it's a problem, although I fully understand why some AZB members feel otherwise.
The switch to Simonis cloth some 40 years ago was bemoaned by some as making the game unrecognizable. Some questioned whether a player should be permitted to break with a different cue. Isn't one supposed to mater the game using a single cue, they asked? Then there was Camel colored cloth. Are you kidding? Some seemingly couldn't handle it, for pool, they said, shouldn't look like that. For me, the introduction of the jump cue made rotation games almost unrecognizable. Since when is pool played through the air?
All these points aside, we've always had to adapt to changes in the game and its equipment, and we've always managed. There's no reason to think this will change.
I think we all want the same thing - standardization of the game, its equipment and its rules. I think we'll get there one day, but it may take quite a while.
This is exactly right, didn't see this until I posted my reply above saying essentially the same thing, and same thing I've been saying for a while. It is a wholly unnecessary change where there is no good reason for it and it comes with no benefits and lots of drawbacks and so it is simply unacceptable.I don't think the issue some members have is necessarily due to fear or resistance to change, but rather wholly unnecessary change. Change to improve the game or performance in the game is generally accepted and often even embraced. Change for the sake of change or worse, for corporate greed on the other hand, tends to rub folks the wrong way. The purple 5 ball is a great example of this. What is the point of making an existing purple ball not purple and using that color for a different one?
It’s a National movement!!!Adopting Make the 4 ball purple again, as well.
The five ball is saying that he doesn't want to steal somebody else's identity (that being the four ball's identity, and yes I heard him say it), nor would society be ok if the five wanted to steal the four's identity because identity theft is bad, mkay.In this day and age, it wouldn't surprise me if the 5 ball wanted to identify as purple. So despite all the common sense of keeping the traditional colors that the overwhelming majority of players favor, the "feelings" of the 5 ball take precedence over any and all objections.
I can see it nowIn this day and age, it wouldn't surprise me if the 5 ball wanted to identify as purple. So despite all the common sense of keeping the traditional colors that the overwhelming majority of players favor, the "feelings" of the 5 ball take precedence over any and all objections.
Thats grey brother. Get your eyes checked. It was Brunswick that pushed gold cloth back when all the post-'Hustler' rooms were opening. They didn't want their lily-white rec centers to remotely look like a poolhall. Had nothing to do with seeing the balls better.
Sounds about like English Ricky in the PLO game, getting up to check if that turn face card is a jack or a queen; and you know?I play at a room occasionally that has a stream table with tv balls and have to go visually check the number on the ball to make certain if I wanna get shape on that ball or not...
Could we have some hot hot ring girls bring the balls out?I don't care what color balls they use, It would just be nice to show a graphic at the bottom of the screen that shows which is which.