I didn't think there was anything wrong with that move. I laughed too.
I'll give you an example of something that I witnessed that is almost the same.
I was looking after a league intermediate tourney for the LO.
There was a cluster of 3 balls. 2 high guarding a low ball. The shooter didn't want to try and shoot his low ball for all he would be doing is definitely giving a BIH and breaking out his opponents balls.
He shot the cue ball right into a pocket giving a BIH but putting the onus on his opponent to hit his balls, thus breaking out his ball.
There was no way that even with ball in hand that the shooter could have done anything but either break the balls out or he could have played a saftey, and then the incoming player probably would have intentionally fouled again.
Now, do you think this was a cheesy move or was it actually good strategy?
Was it any different than the move that Shooter put back on his opponent?
Now, the incoming player could have done the same and shot the cue ball back into a pocket thus giving BIH back to the original fouler. If this would have went back and forth, it would have resulted in a stale mate and a re rack. I've seen that happen a couple of times as well.
The thing is, Shooter apologized for something that he needn't. All he did was start a thread and tell a story of something that happened to him on the weekend. Now he feels bad for doing it.
I'll give you an example of something that I witnessed that is almost the same.
I was looking after a league intermediate tourney for the LO.
There was a cluster of 3 balls. 2 high guarding a low ball. The shooter didn't want to try and shoot his low ball for all he would be doing is definitely giving a BIH and breaking out his opponents balls.
He shot the cue ball right into a pocket giving a BIH but putting the onus on his opponent to hit his balls, thus breaking out his ball.
There was no way that even with ball in hand that the shooter could have done anything but either break the balls out or he could have played a saftey, and then the incoming player probably would have intentionally fouled again.
Now, do you think this was a cheesy move or was it actually good strategy?
Was it any different than the move that Shooter put back on his opponent?
Now, the incoming player could have done the same and shot the cue ball back into a pocket thus giving BIH back to the original fouler. If this would have went back and forth, it would have resulted in a stale mate and a re rack. I've seen that happen a couple of times as well.
The thing is, Shooter apologized for something that he needn't. All he did was start a thread and tell a story of something that happened to him on the weekend. Now he feels bad for doing it.
Last edited: