Pat I think you?re a little too rough on aiming systems but then again I don?t think they should all be clumped together in the same category because some give others a bad name. I feel my method is very accurate and much more than a crutch. I still use it on every single shot I shoot and this is after years of believing aiming was all feel (which it is for those of us blessed with near perfect perception, probably .01% of all players if that) and I had already reached and competed on a professional level. I?m not just saying its good because it?s mine, I started to like it when I saw Jimmy Reid explain the matching contact points and read that Willie use to match up the contact points, alls I did was label the contact points in a manner that makes it easier for us to understand exactly what has to happen to perform a certain shot which also makes it easier for us to recall them & improve our perception of them. I believe throwing out this learned information would be a mistake because the more you use it the better you perception becomes.
Watch me practicing it here (
http://joetucker.net/videoschool.html click on the more movies button and then the aiming workout 0-4, should be 0-4.5?s) and you?ll actually see me leaning over to get more exact information on the front of the cue ball from time to time, I really do practice what I preach.
I use 10 major contact points that are all 5mm wide but I don?t just shoot 1?s, 2?s & 3?s, I shoot 1.5?s, 1.25?s, etc, etc, the more you use it the more dialed in you get. As for what about deflection, curve, throw and friction, I do take them into consideration and adjust by the numbers which is a little more specific that saying ?aim a little fuller or thinner?.
It?s not for everyone but I love it and I have had a lot of success with past students and customers and I do hate having to post in these conversations about aiming systems but if I don?t I feel many people may be mislead and miss out on an opportunity that may improve their game.