All around best american player??

one guy runs 22 and the other guy runs 400! the 22 rails on 400 for the game being too easy! isn't that like felix milan railing on frank robinson over homeruns? " I coulda hit 400, its easy, I just didn't hit the ball far enough":confused:

I ran 22 balls and realized 14.1 was stupid after the 5th ball. I've never claimed to be any good at it or any pool game. Maybe you should actually read the thread before you throw out any comments.

I don't understand why all these people with like 0 post count feel they have any place to jump in and try to bash people. Oh well, I'll still sleep fine tonight.
 
CreeDo...I'll tell ya what Nevel DOESN'T do! He doesn't play professional pool for a living (he came out publically at least a year or two ago, and said, truthfully, that he was quitting pro pool because he couldn't make a living at it)! John Schmidt, on the other hand, not only makes a nice living (although I'm sure he'd like it to be a LOT nicer! :D) being a professional player; but has "cleaned up his act" (for lack of a better descriptive term), and landed himself a coveted spot on a high profile group (Team C.S.I.), with two other high profile players (Earl and Corey). I just wish he'd quit woofing with suprjerk, and just let it die. If Larry really wanted to play John, he'd reach out to him on his own, without some loudmouthed alleged representative.

Scott Lee
www.poolknowledge.com

You're right, Larry doesn't play it professionally. He has a job and plays pool when he can. That's just so terrible! How can anyone live with themselves for doing that? And why should Larry take time out of his day to get on here and post when he can call me quick and tell me what to post? For him to post the things that I do for him it would take an hour using his hunt and peck typing method. He's more than capable of picking who he wants to speak for him, don't be jealous he didn't pick you. HAHAHAHA!!!
 
Did you read all that before you hit submit?

I've been trying to figure out what you mean by this question? :) I've looked at my message and don't see whats wrong with it...

Do you mean that my offer of running 400 balls for $1000 is too easy, or do you mean its a waste of time to offer since it is clear he is not capable of doing so?

I was merely trying to point out that if the game is so easy, and just for practice, then this would be a lucrative practice session.

Maybe I don't get your question...
 
I ran 22 balls and realized 14.1 was stupid after the 5th ball. I've never claimed to be any good at it or any pool game. Maybe you should actually read the thread before you throw out any comments.

I don't understand why all these people with like 0 post count feel they have any place to jump in and try to bash people. Oh well, I'll still sleep fine tonight.


I'm not bashing you, but I still have my offer on the table. While I realize you have no intention of attempting it, maybe someone you know wants to try, since 14.1 is so easy - and anyone can run balls if they want.

In case you missed my post, my offer is that you can bring the player of your choice to Vegas next month during BCA. I'll be there May 10-23. Your player can attempt to break and run 400 balls. If they succeed, I'll pay them $1000. If they fail to run 400 balls, they pay me $1000. Easy enough, right? By your logic, any decent poolplayer can run balls, so lets see them try. There will be no opponent, just your player, 400 balls, and 1000 dollars.

Actually, I realize that may be steep, so you can bring your favorite player and try this as well:

Your player can break and run 100 balls. I'll pay them $100. If they dont run 100 balls, they pay me $100. And then do it again.

We can stay all day long so your player can "practice"

If they do it, we can re-rack and do it again. We can stay as long as you like. Hell, I'll move to vegas if they wanna "practice" like this everyday.

Let me know if you have any intent on backing up your claim of how easy 14.1 is.
 
I'm not bashing you, but I still have my offer on the table. While I realize you have no intention of attempting it, maybe someone you know wants to try, since 14.1 is so easy - and anyone can run balls if they want.

In case you missed my post, my offer is that you can bring the player of your choice to Vegas next month during BCA. I'll be there May 10-23. Your player can attempt to break and run 400 balls. If they succeed, I'll pay them $1000. If they fail to run 400 balls, they pay me $1000. Easy enough, right? By your logic, any decent poolplayer can run balls, so lets see them try. There will be no opponent, just your player, 400 balls, and 1000 dollars.

Actually, I realize that may be steep, so you can bring your favorite player and try this as well:

Your player can break and run 100 balls. I'll pay them $100. If they dont run 100 balls, they pay me $100. And then do it again.

We can stay all day long so your player can "practice"

If they do it, we can re-rack and do it again. We can stay as long as you like. Hell, I'll move to vegas if they wanna "practice" like this everyday.

Let me know if you have any intent on backing up your claim of how easy 14.1 is.

Please go find the post where I said it was easy. I've said it was boring, stupid and not a real game. I've said that it's easier than rotation games. I think I've said it's easier than one-pocket and banks (if I haven't, I've meant to). I've said that only a handful of players actually play it and even less take it seriously. Umm, I might have said more but I can't remember. Oh, and I do believe that any of the top player, if they can keep from being bored long enough, can run 400 balls. Just because John is the only player that enjoys the game that much to actually do that doesn't meant he's the only person that CAN do it. There's a big difference.

Oh, as for Vegas, if I wanted to spend all day in a pool hall I would stay at home. If for some reason we do end up going to a pool hall, I might have a couple guys that would take the 100 ball challenge as that won't occupy massive amounts of time. We'll see what happens.
 
I've been trying to figure out what you mean by this question? :) I've looked at my message and don't see whats wrong with it...

Do you mean that my offer of running 400 balls for $1000 is too easy, or do you mean its a waste of time to offer since it is clear he is not capable of doing so?

I was merely trying to point out that if the game is so easy, and just for practice, then this would be a lucrative practice session.

Maybe I don't get your question...

Just giving you a hard time. Seems like this is the equivalent of some one offering 1000 bucks to anyone that can break and run 9 racks of nineball in a row.
 
Disco, just so you're aware, Larry isn't my favorite player...you are. He's just my friend. LOL. :thumbup: See ya in Vegas.
 
I'm not bashing you, but I still have my offer on the table. While I realize you have no intention of attempting it, maybe someone you know wants to try, since 14.1 is so easy - and anyone can run balls if they want.

In case you missed my post, my offer is that you can bring the player of your choice to Vegas next month during BCA. I'll be there May 10-23. Your player can attempt to break and run 400 balls. If they succeed, I'll pay them $1000. If they fail to run 400 balls, they pay me $1000. Easy enough, right? By your logic, any decent poolplayer can run balls, so lets see them try. There will be no opponent, just your player, 400 balls, and 1000 dollars.

Actually, I realize that may be steep, so you can bring your favorite player and try this as well:

Your player can break and run 100 balls. I'll pay them $100. If they dont run 100 balls, they pay me $100. And then do it again.

We can stay all day long so your player can "practice"

If they do it, we can re-rack and do it again. We can stay as long as you like. Hell, I'll move to vegas if they wanna "practice" like this everyday.

Let me know if you have any intent on backing up your claim of how easy 14.1 is.

Don't worry Allen, you'll never get arrested for gambling. :wink:
 
Please go find the post where I said it was easy. I've said it was boring, stupid and not a real game. I've said that it's easier than rotation games. I think I've said it's easier than one-pocket and banks (if I haven't, I've meant to). I've said that only a handful of players actually play it and even less take it seriously. Umm, I might have said more but I can't remember. Oh, and I do believe that any of the top player, if they can keep from being bored long enough, can run 400 balls. Just because John is the only player that enjoys the game that much to actually do that doesn't meant he's the only person that CAN do it. There's a big difference.

Oh, as for Vegas, if I wanted to spend all day in a pool hall I would stay at home. If for some reason we do end up going to a pool hall, I might have a couple guys that would take the 100 ball challenge as that won't occupy massive amounts of time. We'll see what happens.

Sorry if I misunderstood what you said. OK, so you believe it's not easy, but it's easier than rotation games.

Then if it is easier, why don't any of your rotation playing friends wanna come take my money? Is $1000 not exciting enough? Would they be more inclined to come and do this for 2 or 5K? How much makes it un-boring?

Let me know who your player is and how much they wanna do this for, and I will see if I can accomodate. I know its easier than rotation games, so I'm sure you shouldn't have a problem finding someone.

And as for Vegas, if you don't wanna spend all day in the poolhall, that's fine. Let me know where they wanna "practice" running 100 ball runs for $100 a pop and maybe I can travel... :)
 
Sorry if I misunderstood what you said. OK, so you believe it's not easy, but it's easier than rotation games.

Then if it is easier, why don't any of your rotation playing friends wanna come take my money? Is $1000 not exciting enough? Would they be more inclined to come and do this for 2 or 5K? How much makes it un-boring?

Let me know who your player is and how much they wanna do this for, and I will see if I can accomodate. I know its easier than rotation games, so I'm sure you shouldn't have a problem finding someone.

And as for Vegas, if you don't wanna spend all day in the poolhall, that's fine. Let me know where they wanna "practice" running 100 ball runs for $100 a pop and maybe I can travel... :)

There is no amount of money that can make 14.1 exciting. Like I said though, if we get bored enough I might have a couple guys that I could bring to the pool hall in Vegas to take a couple $100 shots for something to do.

Oh, and just as an example as to why I feel rotation games are harder. There is an older guy that lives near me. He's been playing pool for something like 30 years. I've seen him run 79 balls, DRUNK. I've NEVER seen him run a rack of 9-ball. Sure, 79 balls isn't great or anything, but when your drunk and can do that but you can't run a rack of 9-ball sober it says something. Hmm, maybe drinking is the secret. LOL.
 
There is no amount of money that can make 14.1 exciting. Like I said though, if we get bored enough I might have a couple guys that I could bring to the pool hall in Vegas to take a couple $100 shots for something to do.

Oh, and just as an example as to why I feel rotation games are harder. There is an older guy that lives near me. He's been playing pool for something like 30 years. I've seen him run 79 balls, DRUNK. I've NEVER seen him run a rack of 9-ball. Sure, 79 balls isn't great or anything, but when your drunk and can do that but you can't run a rack of 9-ball sober it says something. Hmm, maybe drinking is the secret. LOL.

So, OK, 14.1 is too easy, and your player would be too bored to run 400 balls for $5000 to prove this point, is that what you are saying?

The games are different, and both are difficult to excel at. What you are missing is that most players won't take this bet because it is too hard, and requires way too much skill. Some players apparently don't want to admit that it's too difficult, instead they dismiss it as boring or something other... Lots and lots and lots of players can run a rack of 9 ball. Yes, it gets harder to string racks together, and thats where more skill comes in... How many do you know can just run 50 balls, even just for practice?

9-Ball became so much more popular because it is faster paced, and more people can compete at it. More people have a chance to win playing 9 ball against anyone. A good player could get lucky and win a race to 7 against a lot of top players... You won't see that happen in 14.1... The luck variable is removed. A top player can dominate a weaker player.

Would you rather find a player that wants to just do a 200 ball run for like $500? Or would you rather just admit its too hard?
 
Good points all! You need to know that Billy and Freddie are the two that created this monster One Pocket player known as Efren. They both spent many hours playing and teaching Efren the finer points of the game, so if he plays good they look good. Kapeche?

Ronnie and Efren had/have two different styles. Playing close position around the balls Efren has no equal, not Ronnie, not anyone. Playing balls off the end rail and getting position, again Efren is superior to everyone I've ever seen. Manufacturing run outs from unlikely or impossible situations Ronnie was the king. Finding unorthodox shots and making them, plus breaking out balls to boot, Ronnie was the master.

Kicking multiple rails to escape traps and make balls, again no one did it like Ronnie. Efren's run outs look easier because he plays such pin point position. Ronnie's run outs looked miraculous, but after you saw him do it so many times, you knew it was no fluke.

In a tournament setting Ronnie was merely good. His best pool was saved for the big money games, of which he won many. No question Efren has a lot of heart, but Ronnie had heart and the moxie to take on what appeared to be a bad game at first. And then turn everything around! He was the real deal. I can attest to that.


Yes Jay, I hear you and want to give gratitudes for the tutorial.

I have utmost respect for all the old skoolers, especially of course for the champions but also everyone who has dedicated their lives to our sport.

I wish there was some footage of Ronnie's game in his prime, I'd really want to see that. Same goes of course with Lassiter and all the others.


Two things came up in my mind:

Firstly: I must ask about Ronnie's game and those days, that wasn't the pockets looser then?
I mean, Efren's pin point cue ball gives him so much advantage when the pockets are tight, and if I've got it correct, Ronnie used to play somewhat reckless/aggressive 1-P, then he couldn't probably manage with that if the pockets are tight. If the pockets are loose, then aggressive style suits better when you find the confidence. Cue ball doesn't matter so much, when you have the feeling in your guts that you'll pocket it anyway.

Secondly: What did you mean by this:

"Playing balls off the end rail and getting position, again Efren is superior to everyone I've ever seen."

Naturally I understand the "getting position" part, but as I've understood that Efren's biggest advantage is the thing you mentioned first (playing close position), I've also understood that his end rail banking is one of the weaker parts. Not saying he sucks in that of course, but that when playing him, many other top 1-P players rather shoot the balls to the end rail (isn't it call
"Chicago Style"?) to avoid this 'close position artistry' from him and challenging him for long bank shots.

Also I was surprised you gave credit for Ronnie for multirail-kicking, as I've always thought Efren is in his own class in that, but I'm not challenging your statement, just surprised.
 
So, OK, 14.1 is too easy, and your player would be too bored to run 400 balls for $5000 to prove this point, is that what you are saying?

The games are different, and both are difficult to excel at. What you are missing is that most players won't take this bet because it is too hard, and requires way too much skill. Some players apparently don't want to admit that it's too difficult, instead they dismiss it as boring or something other... Lots and lots and lots of players can run a rack of 9 ball. Yes, it gets harder to string racks together, and thats where more skill comes in... How many do you know can just run 50 balls, even just for practice?

9-Ball became so much more popular because it is faster paced, and more people can compete at it. More people have a chance to win playing 9 ball against anyone. A good player could get lucky and win a race to 7 against a lot of top players... You won't see that happen in 14.1... The luck variable is removed. A top player can dominate a weaker player.

Would you rather find a player that wants to just do a 200 ball run for like $500? Or would you rather just admit its too hard?

There is nothing you can ever say that will convince me that 14.1 is harder than rotation games. Speaking of rotation games, is 14.1 harder than rotation itself? I can't wait to hear what people have to say about that.

And you can throw out as many challenges as you want. I've already given you an answer and it's not going to change.
 
By the way, John, I respect and surely think 14.1 is a very hard game. But, I would rather watch an apple tree grow from a seedling than watch or play it. And before anyone says anything about "Oh, and it's just too hard and you can't play it" I'm not helpless at all. I just don't enjoy it, therefore, I don't play it. I truely don't know five people in the Carolinas who play it on the norm.


The thing with Straight Pool is, that you have to get "inside" of it first, to learn the game and enjoy it. Maybe you could say that from any game, but with 14.1. to get inside of it, is much more difficult - but definitely worth it. If you play it half heartedly, you'll never get the point what there's hidden and though never enjoy it either (or run long breaks).

Or why do you think all the old skool greats used to love and especially respect the game?



And for the record, I'm not a straight pool player nor fan, I practice it like once a year or something, but during these couple of decades I've played, I've "hit the spot" couple of times, gotten myself inside the game, and when that happened, my view point for that game changed dramatically and I started to respect it. (It's just few yrs ago when it happened first time.)

I still don't count it inside my top 5 favorite games, but certainly respect it in top 3 with 1-P and 15 ball rotation.

And those rare moments when I've been "in it", I have really enjoyed it, in the same level as rotation games or 1-p, maybe even higher.
And, the effect that has had on my over all game, has been much better than any other game individually.

Still though, I seldom have motivation to practice it.
 
Please go find the post where I said it was easy. I've said it was boring, stupid and not a real game. I've said that it's easier than rotation games. I think I've said it's easier than one-pocket and banks (if I haven't, I've meant to). I've said that only a handful of players actually play it and even less take it seriously. Umm, I might have said more but I can't remember. Oh, and I do believe that any of the top player, if they can keep from being bored long enough, can run 400 balls. Just because John is the only player that enjoys the game that much to actually do that doesn't meant he's the only person that CAN do it. There's a big difference.

Oh, as for Vegas, if I wanted to spend all day in a pool hall I would stay at home. If for some reason we do end up going to a pool hall, I might have a couple guys that would take the 100 ball challenge as that won't occupy massive amounts of time. We'll see what happens.


Suprnva, if 14.1. would be easier than rotation games, then I suppose 14.1. specialist should be underdog when he'd play rotation specialist in a match
which would consist both, 14.1. and for example 9-ball.

Europe is full of 14.1. specialist and USA full of 9/10-ball specialist.
If we could get two guys with similar speed to play that kind of a match, I could bet my finger that the 14.1. specialist would win in the long run.

Ask Sigel or Varner their opinions if you don't believe me.
 
Oh, and just as an example as to why I feel rotation games are harder. There is an older guy that lives near me. He's been playing pool for something like 30 years. I've seen him run 79 balls, DRUNK. I've NEVER seen him run a rack of 9-ball. Sure, 79 balls isn't great or anything, but when your drunk and can do that but you can't run a rack of 9-ball sober it says something. Hmm, maybe drinking is the secret. LOL.

Whoa, Suprnva, you just stated something which either is a blatant lie, or you just haven't seen the old guy ever play 9-ball.

I know many players who have strung 4-5 packs in 9-ball but never run 79 in 14.1.
 
Whoa, Suprnva, you just stated something which either is a blatant lie, or you just haven't seen the old guy ever play 9-ball.

I know many players who have strung 4-5 packs in 9-ball but never run 79 in 14.1.

Call me a liar all you want. I know what I've seen. Well, in this case, what I haven't seen I suppose. I'm not saying he hasn't run a rack of 9-ball, I'm just saying I've never seen it and I've seen him play probably 300 racks of 9-ball and he's never run out from the break on any of them. It's not a large sample size or anything, but it's big enough I feel.

Anyways, nobody will ever convince me that 14.1 is harder. Just like nobody will convince you and John and the other 14.1 lovers that it's easier.
 
Back
Top