classiccues said:Is it just me or does it seem like the whole CNC thing is making people LAZY. I have seen many a pointed cue RUINED by rounded inlays. I am sorry, but I have just seen two titleists which have POINTS, have the flow of the cue interrupted by radius'es or radiia's or as I like to say multiple roundness. This for those who failed geometry.. diamonds, rectangles and squares have FOUR edges when shown in 2d. When you radius them you now have 8 surfaces. Blunts are for smoking, not for inlays. In fact now I think I'll refer to pointed cues with round inlays as cues suffering from blunt force trauma, or BFT cues.
Slotted diamonds, same thing. It's admirable that you are adopting the look, but running a round cutter in to pocket the diamonds for the slots is lazy..
JMHO..
JV
YOU CAN'T EVER BE "TOO MUCH OF A PURIST"
I TOTALLY AGREE THAT ROUNDED INLAYS DON'T BELONG IN SHARP POINTED CUES.
TRADITIONAL SHARP INLAY PATTERNS SHOULDN'T BE "LAZIED UP" BY NEW CUEMAKERS. IF YOU WANT TO DO ROUND INLAYS, DO OVALS AND CIRCLES.
THE ONE THAT BOTHERS ME THE MOST, ARE THESE "NEW" PROPELLORS, THAT ARE SO ROUNED, AND OUT OF PROPORTION THAT THEY ACTUALLY MAKE ME ANGRY.
IMO.... IF YOU CAN'T DO SOMETHING PROPERLY, DON'T DO IT.
MY FAVORITE REPLY FROM CUEMAKERS THAT DO ROUND INLAYS IS "SHARP INLAYS COST MORE" AND ALL THAT REPLY EVER MAKES THINK IS......"DON'T OFFER SHARP DESIGNS, LIKE DIAMONDS, AND BOXES, IF YOU CAN'T/WON'T DO SHARP WORK IN YOUR STANDARD PRICING".
I KNOW THAT I'M TO LAZY TO SHARPEN INLAYS AND POCKETS, BUT THAT'S WHY I DON'T MAKE CUES.
Last edited: