The sweep direction is always determined by how the shot lays from the given perception: thicker or thinner. That is always the variable to determine. I don't know how else to explain it. You can't map perceptions or sweeps to static angles.
Thank you and that explains everything.
My perceptions are dependent upon what it is im tryin to do with the cb. So based on that, no wonder why I have not been able to quantify it reasonably, which sounds rather dumb but my method is so involved, I often get confused or sometimes totally lost.
Thanks for the info. I may have buried myself with all the multiple combination sequences in order to establish a platform that I believe has a answer for just about any shot with any spin. Correct alignment with either eye and delivery system from the ground up with the necessary multiple angles of attack.
My theory is this, maximum spin, if aligned correctly, can produce a big window, no different than any other high percentage shot. So, perception is where it all starts and with that being said, a sweep is relative to that and not a static ob/cb fixed angle to a pocket.
With CTE, which I repeat I don't use, it's very interesting how when using the manual version correctly, the pivot or in essence a sweep is a obvious left or right back to center.
I may have tried it 50 times or so and not once did I come in without a obvious pivot direction back to center. So, I know CTE is real enough and it is in fact a unique and probably the best visual system because you don't have to rely on shadows or lighting reflections on the top of the ob.
If im not mistaken, hal had a system for fluorescent tube lighting that shines on the top of the ob. If there is three tubes, then there is 3 curved lines of light reflecting on the top of the ob.
I would never use that or a shadow system if you put a gun to my head.
Thanks