They were only appeasing you. Of course it behaves differently
So...which are you saying? They were only appeasing me or it behaves differently? I don't know why you would assume they were saying something other than their opinion of their own product?
but I was focusing on the fact that you said it was heavier (and by inferrence, behaves heavy). It doesn't. Period.
I guess I could re-read my post...but I do not think that it is a fact that I ever said the green logo was heavier. I think I said it behaves as if it were heavier--perhaps you decided to infer that I meant I thought it
was heavier? I think it weighs what it is supposed to weight. Probably right around 6 oz.
Does it behave differently? Only in that it's more susceptible to scratches and picking up chalk. There's more difference in playing with a Red Circle Aramith vs. a Red Circle imposter. In other words, there's not a whole hell of a lot. Yes, there's a difference, but of all the things to consider complaining about, the use of the Green Aramith Logo cueball is not one of them, IMO. That decision should be praised considering they use Valley Tables.
So again, are you saying there is or is not a difference? I certainly perceived a difference in the way it played. As I explained, I got to try the exact same table with a red circle aramith, and it played considerably different. Was I imagining this? Power of suggestion perhaps? I could
feel the difference. Period.
Maybe the complaint should be about the tables
No, it should be about the cueball in my opinion. The tables were adequate, assuming a good cueball was used. I'm not saying the green logo is horrible, I'm just not even considering the over size/overweight balls. In comparison to those it is a dream come true.
What IMO you fail to understand or are confused about was when this Aramith Green Logo came out, it was (and still is) a dream come true for millions of bar table players.
What makes you say this? Actually, I remember learning about the green logo ball before it came out. At the time, I thought it was the best thing I ever heard. I was just learning the differences between balls, and learning that I hated the crap in most bars. I was very excited about it. No confusion there. However, just because it is wonderful for millions of people does not make it the best option. There are better options. Millions of people are very satisfied with Budweiser, but that doesn't make it a great beer. It makes it a popular beer. The same could be said for all kinds of pop music. I guess we tread dangerously close to a philosophical discussion here. :smile:
Did you not realize how bad things were prior to the Aramith Green Logo? If not, please see my post on the retrospective on cueballs.
Yup, sure did.
So, you're complaints are what's confusing.
Hmm...I wasn't crazy about the way the cueball played. I think the APA could have done better. That seems fairly straightforward.
I think this statement completely validates what others are saying about your complaints: adjust to the conditions. I don't say this lightly. It's not like they gave you the Dynamo Red Dot or the Universal B Metal flake ball. They gave you a ball that rolls straight (unlike the Cage Ball with its J-Hooks) and weighs within anyone's reasonable specification. So, it sounds like you're complaining about non-issues.
Fred, it sounds like you simply do not perceive a difference between the green logo aramith ball on a valley table set up with their teflon cloth, and a regular cueball on the same setup. If you don't feel the difference, thats ok. It actually works out better for the APA, since you are going to be easier to please with their equipment selection. I am, however, confused as to whether you are telling me that I don't in fact perceive a difference, or that I should not care about it.
It's not like the air-conditioning was turned off, which is more of a detriment to the game than using a Green Aramith Logo cueball will ever be.
I totally agree with you. However it is hard to believe the average league player being any more aware of this difference than the cue ball. Personally I would take not A/C (especially in bone dry Vegas) and the cue ball I like :grin:
In other words, for as strong as your initial post's are sounding against this wonderful cueball, you're not going to get a lot of agreement.
Well, I guess this claim could be verified by reviewing this thread and counting up the posters for/against my initial statements. I am sure there have been plenty of each.
You're making it sound like the conditions were "crappy" and the cueball was "heavy." Neither of those adjectives have been echoed by anyone else that was there.
The conditions were below my expectations, primarily due to the cue ball. As for the echos, please review this thread. There are many posts indicating they agree with what I say. In fact, I specifically recall one by John Barton specifically saying that the green logo cue ball didn't play properly. I'm at work, but it would be fun to copy all the posts here that agreed with me.
You want crappy and heavy to compare to? Come to the local VFW with it's threadbare, water-stained cloth, sharp metal pocket corners, and lumbering boulders for cueballs.
Ha ha...no one is paying me to go there, so I will take a pass. Sound pretty terrible.
You are implying and really almost being very explicit that these balls don't weigh the same and the mass isn't evenly distributed so it rolls correctly as the other balls. But, they are the same weight, and they do roll correctly because the mass is distributed correctly. That's what's great about the Aramith Green Logo!!
I guess my advice is to read a little more carefully. I explicitly said that they do weigh the same, so there must be some other explanation for why it plays differenetly. I suggested as a possibility that the density is not uniform from the center to the surface of the ball. When you read my phrase "doesn't roll properly" you decided that meant "doesn't roll straight." On the contrary. I think that the mass is definitely even in that it is concentric (or whatever the term is with a sphere.) Meaning that if you pick a spot inside the ball a certain distance from the center, it will weigh the same as any other spot that same distance from center. I am proposing that it might be the case that if you pick two spots two
different distances from the center, the density might be different. If a higher percentage of the balls mass is in the surface of the ball, it might behave differently than if the mass were even from center to surface. Perhaps I did not articulate that clearly enough in my previous post.
You also say you don't mind the Red Circle, yet that one isn't the same as any of the other cueballs. It bounces more, due to it's carom resin. It sounds like by your logic, using the Red Circle isn't really pool either.
Interesting...I didn't know that. I do think the Red circle is a little different than say a Blue Circle centennial. I guess that explains it. Still, I feel that difference is less than between a blue circle and the green logo. IMHO of course.
Maybe this is the root of your complaint. You're spoiled. And I mean that in a good cheery way. It almost sounds like you didn't have the pleasure of growing up in and around pool halls and bars with no lighting, scarred and broken balls, no food, no air conditions, smoke stained ceilings, and heavy napped cloth. They still exist today. And economics necessitates the use of non-Simonis, non-Centennial balls, and non-Diamond tables. We can't all have the luxury of playing on the best equipment. Bar table tournaments around a bunch of drunks and using the oversized ball, the plug ball, the flake ball. That's standard fare for many of us growing up. I think you need to keep that in perspective.
True true. We as humans used to beat each other with clubs at one time before we had these forums on which to trade ideas. Ideally, we continue to evolve. I am basically advocating following that trend with respect to the cueball and the APA. The fact that conditions are or were ever one way or another only serves to help make my point that it sure would be nice if they were better. Again, I prefer better to worse.
And bear in mind that the Aramith Green Logo is the best bar table cueball out there. I'm still boggled at anyone complaining about them.
Clearly there are people that have an issue with them. They are certainly the best bar table cue ball, but not by much. I kinda like the way the plug ball works believe it or not. While it does not roll right, it feels a little better. Maybe its the surface or something. I guess if I had to choose I would take the green logo ball. I think I have been about 800% clear on what specific issues I have. I am still boggled that people who have read this entire thread still belabor the issues that have been addressed many times. At least you didn't say "you got beat so deal with it".
I really appreciate the comments. I truly enjoy trying to clarify ideas and reach the point where everyone understands what everyone else is talking about. So thanks for that opportunity!!
KMRUNOUT