APA Needs to re-examine the handicap system!

depends on the area I guess - I know 5s and 6s that gamble even against 7s....so skills vs. handicaps vary WIDELY here. lol Some 7s might truly be weak 6s and I know 5s that can beat up on those 7s even (here's the important part - WHEN NEED BE, and getting the spot makes it that much easier).

When I was a 5 or early as a 6, I played up pretty well against higher ratings.. especially if something was on the line. Could I beat the current me? Not unless the old me got hot. 5s beating up on 7s, when need be, is questionable - are they playing up, playing under pressure or are they simply holding back? Many, many times people think somebody is holding back when it is, in fact, the other two (I know very well). It's hard to fight back against a 5 on fire, when they're already 1 or 2 games in on a 3-5 race and still shooting like a 7.

When I moved up to a 7, I went from being the underdog working for something to be the guy everybody else started gunning for. I didn't play as well when I was making an attempt to play up to my own expectations.. but I could still shoot well when faced with a dangerous adversary (a higher 7) or if I didn't think about it. Nowadays, I just play my game and let my opponent deal with it.. I shoot much better when I'm just going about my business now instead of trying "to shoot like I think I should".

I'd easily give my old 5 or 6 self the 1 or 2 game spot and walk away winner more often than not..
 
When I was a 5 or early as a 6, I played up pretty well against higher ratings.. especially if something was on the line. Could I beat the current me? Not unless the old me got hot. 5s beating up on 7s, when need be, is questionable - are they playing up, playing under pressure or are they simply holding back? Many, many times people think somebody is holding back when it is, in fact, the other two (I know very well). It's hard to fight back against a 5 on fire, when they're already 1 or 2 games in on a 3-5 race and still shooting like a 7.

When I moved up to a 7, I went from being the underdog working for something to be the guy everybody else started gunning for. I didn't play as well when I was making an attempt to play up to my own expectations.. but I could still shoot well when faced with a dangerous adversary (a higher 7) or if I didn't think about it. Nowadays, I just play my game and let my opponent deal with it.. I shoot much better when I'm just going about my business now instead of trying "to shoot like I think I should".

I'd easily give my old 5 or 6 self the 1 or 2 game spot and walk away winner more often than not..

Wow doesn't that sound familiar. Move the levels down some and you've described me currently. When I was a 4 I played up against 5's and some 6's and held my own nicely. Now that I'm a 5, it just isn't the same.

And I know it's pretty much all in my head. Dammit. :p I shall vanquish it, someday, maybe starting tonite...:embarrassed2:
 
Wow doesn't that sound familiar. Move the levels down some and you've described me currently. When I was a 4 I played up against 5's and some 6's and held my own nicely. Now that I'm a 5, it just isn't the same.

And I know it's pretty much all in my head. Dammit. :p I shall vanquish it, someday, maybe starting tonite...:embarrassed2:

I'm guessing you have a big gun on your team that gets to play a majority of the other high players.. let me know who it is so I can look them up next time I'm in Maine. :D On a side question.. how big a range does your league/division cover out there?

The best advice I could give you is just to play smart.. don't try to do things that you weren't already doing and don't try to play how you think you should play - just play your game. The more weight you have to give up, the less shots you can afford to give up(ie - play more safeties).
 
Anytime there is a system in place to compute a skill level / handicap – be it pool, bowling, golf etc. there are going to be variables that just cannot be accounted for.
The APA has a system that works well. While no system is or can be 100% perfect, at least the APA has one and tries to improve it as they have done over the years. And it does work well.

If people state that the APA needs to change it, then let’s hear some constructive ways in which to improve it as I'm sure the APA reads these threads? Without hearing suggestions no organization can improve.

As far as no male S/L 2’s at nationals – that’s because years ago most male 2’s would play like 3’s at nationals so the APA just started playing them as 3’s at nationals. Generally, not always, most people play better at nationals than at the local level. Mostly the local level is for fun – a night out from work, home, etc. But when at nationals there’s something to focus on. So starting them as a 3 helps make things more fair. Again this was based upon the findings of these players at nationals over the years.

When it comes to 7’s in 8-ball there will always be a big difference. The APA had to place a highest skill level and that’s the 7. But we all know a 7 can be a 7, but could also be a 20 (if there were such a skill level). But they had to put a max; so this is what we’ll see and continue to see.

I’ve played a variety of leagues over the years and like the APA better because they bring in more people of a variety of skill levels; which over time offers more competition. Additionally, I like the fact that they have a computer system in place. And that does provide for more consistency (while not 100% if players allow inaccuracies in score keeping) than the other leagues that do not.

Again, no system is or will be perfect – just too many variables. But without positive suggestions, nothing will ever get better.


Raise the max from 23 to 24 in both 8ball and 9ball
 
You can't handicap pool. That's saying you can read someone's mind. I believe Mike Massey said that years ago.
 
I started playing APA in '92 when it first came to the OC so I have a few years of experience with it. It was and continues to be a night out of the house for me with good friends and having fun. With that said, I truly believe the APA handicap system is an easily manipulated system that will never change. There are too many folks out there who know how it all works and stay at a certain number of innings per game during match play to keep a lower ranking. Players can win "close matches" and stay ranked the same, bottom line.

Yes the APA is geared for lower and medium ranked players. If it was not there would be no APA. The better a team gets the more lower ranked players are needed to fill the void. It is set up this way purposefully for the APA to prosper. And why do you ask? It's a business folks. The matches are not shown on espn and I have never seen OTR streaming a bar league to the masses. There are no giant payouts or action on the other tables. It is simply a beginners introduction to billiards that can help improve their games and have a little fun while doing so. IMHO if you get to a SL7 or 8 in APA you need to go find a pool hall with real players and real tables and never look back.

As for me, I long for the old days when I could walk into a pool hall for a tournament and the organizer knew me and ranked me accordingly. Some tourneys did not allow me to shoot because of my play and I was ok with that. I knew where to go when I wanted action and I knew where to go when I wanted to be left alone. Now it seems I just want to be left alone. Maybe the APA ruined me. Probably not but I have to keep the controversy going for this thread to keep going. ;)
 
I played APA for a few years...until the handicap god raised our numbers so we couldn't make the 23 pt. ceiling (two of us were raised just before playoffs). The system is set up so you will form another team, bringing in more $$$ for the APA Machine. You aint gonna change it.

We moved to TAP six years ago, are still together and couldn't be happier. In TAP matches you can go to 25 pts., and most APA players are rated a point less in TAP (we can play 6-5-5-5-4, but these players would be rated 7-6-6-6-5 in APA for 30 pts; we would need to become 3 APA teams and find some real novices to satisfy the 23 pt. rule). The APA system seems to produce more sandbaggin' so you and your buddies can stay together.

So give TAP or BCA a try, or form your own league.
 
TC I have to beg to differ with you. I am currently a SL3 in 8 and 9 ball. I have been for a year. I pre-qualified for a Vegas qualifier tournament as a 3. I lost the last 3 or 4 matches in the year. Lost in the playoffs. I ended as a 3. Then kindly explain how having not shot 1 ball between sessions I went from a 3 to a 4 in 8ball. And guess what, at the Vegas qualifier, not a 2 or a 3 in sight. And quite a few other players reporting just the same. Oh and by the way I went back down to a 3 after several losses in the current session. I would love to hear an honest answer to this question.

Mark Shuman

BTW I have not won a single 8 ball match this session yet. And yes I will never, ever roll over for anyone. I give 100% each and every game I shoot.
 
"... I have come to the table at the end of the night to sign-off on the scoresheets and seen where the other teams scorekeepers have maybe marked three or four total safeties where I had about 20-25 marked. I can't count the number of times this has happened. So, when two teams play each other that neither one of them mark safeties, well.........."

Yes, and we APA LOs can see this too. One week doesn't prove anything but when teams insist on this pattern week after week the APA LO can, in fairness to the honest players, adjust the SLs of those players/teams who try to hide their true skill by such "creative" score keeping. This is to the benefit of the honest players as it is what we are paid to do.

Several times a week (for years now, it seems) some one will get on one of these threads and shout to the world how "that damn LO raised my SL for no reason at all, etc". Well, there is a reason and you know it. Try keeping score accurately and playing to win every game like you're supposed to. Your SL is a representation of your pool playing skill in relation to the other players in your area. The SL 6s, as a group, are better than the SL 5s; the SL 5s are better than the sl 4s, etc. The best half of your most recent nights are averaged together with an allowance made for your overall W-L record. The numbers are crunched by the software, reviewed each week by the LO and POOF - there's your SL. That's the short version of how it works.

To you honest APA players - THANK YOU for your participation. We LOs value your trust in us to do battle with the cheaters of the world. We strive to give you your monies worth of value for your recreational money and time you invest in your APA play.

To you APA sandbaggers - I can't catch everyone one of you on every night but eventually you always make it obvious what your real SL is. Those players on the other team just love to write up details for my files about you. When I get enough feedback, from different sources, and have reviewed your score keeping pattern - do you really think you are going to be getting much benefit of the doubt?

For many of us the APA is our only job and our only source of income. Do you really think we are going to screw it up just to make your life miserable for no reason at all? If you try to cheat my honest players I will eventually catch you and deal with you as I think fair.

Many of the contributors to these threads are VERY accomplished players and really take the game very seriously. I respect that. Many of you regular posters must realize how the APA is structured and what our league has to offer to players of your caliber. Many of you higher skilled players would be much happier playing BCA or some other system anyway. The APA is not after you as a paying player, though you are welcome as long as you abide by APA rules. The APA is designed to appeal to the lower skill players (typically SL 2,3,4 and some 5 and 6s) and protects those players by the 23 rule and enforcement of the sandbagging protection rules. It is not rocket science and it has never been a secret. It's in our rules for all to read.

The 23 RULE does not force teams to break up. When you have 5 to 8 individual players organize into an APA team you know exactly what kind of team mates you are joining. If your SLs finally get to a level which gives you issues with meeting the 23 rule requirement - you knew this was going to happen before the LO did. Seldom does a team sign up a total stranger with no idea what his SL will be (at least approximately) by play off time. No LO can force a player onto your roster that you do not want. If you find "damn, we can't meet the 23 rule anymore" it usually means you just can't play your favorite combination of players any more. You have to choose a new lineup to fit into that weekly zig saw puzzle of the 23 rule. If the APA system gets your individual players up to where your submitted score sheets show they should be - it's not the fault of the APA. It's your players being rated honestly accordingly to the APA system and review by the LO. Your weekly opponents have to deal with the same issue each week.

To those that wish to post here all kinds of annoyomous horror stories with no names, places, or details which would allow verification - don't you realize how obvious you are being to the rest of us? Whatever! I love you anyway.

FULL DISCLOSURE - I have been the APA LO in Jackson County Mo (much of greater Kansas City) since 1980. My name is Tom Campbell. My email is TC99999999@aol.com. My players weekly match fee is $6. Last year I paid back over $32,000, more than any other billiard league in the greater KC area. And YES I do this for a living and I do make a profit, which is what I live on. My location owners do not give away beer or food for free - you pay for it. You have to put quarters into their table to play. If you want your own cue you have to buy it.

Few things in the world are free. Except the opportunity to get up here and proclaim to the world how "that damn LO raised my SL for absolutely no reason at all". Somewhere there is another sandbagger, who also isn't getting away with it anymore, willing to offer you his sympathy.

my name is buddy watson and play in apa in memphis tn. im new to leagues and currently in my 3rd session. i play double jeapordy and started as a 3 in both 8 and 9 ball. end of 1st session i was a 4 in both.

the 1st 2 weeks of the 2nd session i was matched against 2s in 9 ball, and beat both pretty badly. i was raised to a 5 before my 3rd match. lost every 9 ball match the rest of the season, thats 10 games in a row. since im now the highest s/l on my team im the one selected to play all the 6 and 7s. im not complaining, i love the challenge of playing higher level players.

i was raised simply because i beat two 2s very easily, not because my overall level of play had improved that substantialy in the previous 2 weeks. i reviewed every one of those 10 matches. 4 of them i would have won had i still been a 4. not only was i penalized, but my entire team . those 4 losses cost us to not qualify for the playoffs.

im not bashing the apa, i love playing in it. i just think when they review your scores they should take into account the level of the opponent you beat. just because a 4 can beat the crap out of a 2 dont mean he can play a 5 even. thats just what they are assuming when they raise a 4 to a 5 under those circumstanses imo.
by the way i was raised to a 5 2nd week this session in 8 ball after beating a 2 the 1st week. aint complaining now, actually im enjoying it this time.
 
So essentially what your saying is that the rule is to keep a team/teams from being stronger? Since when has THAT been wrong? As long as the 23-rule applies to their team, it should be able to get as strong as possible while staying within the limit. Besides, it's only three players, and every team in the league would have the same opportunity to strengthen their team too.
In a way, yes. It actually keeps the 23-rule from becoming the 22-rule. When APA came up with the 9-Ball format, they tried to keep the non-game-related rules the same as they were in 8-Ball to limit the confusion for players who play both formats. The 23 rule was one such rule. However, since they took the opportunity to expand the number of skill levels for 9-Ball, they also created more ways that the skill levels could combine to meet the 23-rule. After some time (a year or two, I'm not sure how long it was), it became evident that they needed to do more to prevent certain combinations, as those combinations were dominating league play. The senior skill level rule was what they came up with to deal with those specific combinations.

As for every team being able to field the same combinations, that's not really true. Skill level 6-9 players make up only 15% of the league. Even with full 8-player teams, the average senior skill level player would have to be on 3 1/2 9-Ball teams. So while any given team could create these combinations, the opportunity is not there for every team. There just aren't enough senior skill level players.


I don't really care as the rule has never affected one of my teams, nor will it ever. I was just curious as to why they have a 23-rule AND a senior skill level rule in the same league.

Your answer is proof positive that the league is geared for beginners and intermediate players. Not a bad thing, just proof.

Maniac

I agree, and I don't believe I ever said it wasn't. By the way, since we're geared for beginners and intermediate players, wouldn't it make sense that we want them to play the majority of the matches? Another reason for the senior skill level rule - to prevent 15% of the players from playing 60% of the matches.
 
The APA Teams here in NH have just been handed some NEW rules.
1) If you win your division and come in below 50% in the next session, you are disqualified and don't get to go to PLAY-OFFS. Example: If there are 8 teams you have to be in the top 4 to go to play-offs.
2) If you get caught SANDBAGGING you are automatical put up a skill level and frozen there. You can still go up, but never down.

Would love to know what everyone thinks about the NEW rules....
 
The APA Teams here in NH have just been handed some NEW rules.
1) If you win your division and come in below 50% in the next session, you are disqualified and don't get to go to PLAY-OFFS. Example: If there are 8 teams you have to be in the top 4 to go to play-offs.
2) If you get caught SANDBAGGING you are automatical put up a skill level and frozen there. You can still go up, but never down.

Would love to know what everyone thinks about the NEW rules....

This is not a new rule. It's been in place for years.
This is to keep teams that win a session / become qualified from sandbagging the next session(s).
These are put into place to try and prevent sandbagging.
And these rules are not an absolute that you will be disqualified.
Read the APA Team Manual & you'll see it right there.
 
This is not a new rule. It's been in place for years.
This is to keep teams that win a session / become qualified from sandbagging the next session(s).
These are put into place to try and prevent sandbagging.
And these rules are not an absolute that you will be disqualified.
Read the APA Team Manual & you'll see it right there.

These rules were received with our sheets last week. I will look though our rule book. But I will have to say I have never heard of these rules before. Thanks for the info.
 
Good luck

U R welcome.
Now that you are qualified - good luck & shoot well!
Getting out to Vegas for APA Nationals is a blast.

Any league operator worth their salt - regardless of league they run - will do their best to provide as much info to a qualified team so that no surprises come up.
Most leagues have so much in rule books that it is often difficult for all players to know every rule. It seems like your LO was just trying to make sure your team is aware of key elements now that your team is advancing.
 
Last edited:
The APA Teams here in NH have just been handed some NEW rules.
1) If you win your division and come in below 50% in the next session, you are disqualified and don't get to go to PLAY-OFFS. Example: If there are 8 teams you have to be in the top 4 to go to play-offs.
2) If you get caught SANDBAGGING you are automatical put up a skill level and frozen there. You can still go up, but never down.

Would love to know what everyone thinks about the NEW rules....

That's how it's done here next door to you in Maine. Though it's phrased a little more reasonably... if your team finishes below the top half they MAY be disqualified from the playoffs. As someone else pointed out, it's to stop teams who have already qualified for states from just dumping all their matches to protect their handicaps. And also to prevent teams from just dumping for their friends teams, to protect the integrity of the current session, as much as possible.

As for those caught sandbagging, good. I don't know if that's new or different, or just now being brought up to your players attention. But sandbaggers need to be penalized, and it needs to be a deterrent to others so that they don't cheat, as well.
 
I'm guessing you have a big gun on your team that gets to play a majority of the other high players.. let me know who it is so I can look them up next time I'm in Maine. :D On a side question.. how big a range does your league/division cover out there?

There are enough 5's - 6's - 7's in our division that I can play those level players plenty. Though we do have a 7 that will usually play most of the other teams 7's... (There is a 7 on almost every team currently. Probably 9 or 10 out of 14 teams.) We mix it up pretty well.

I can point out the better players for you easily enough, as well as the better players that don't play league. :p

Our league covers the lower 2/3rds of the state. I believe there are 14 or 15 divisions. Our division has 14 teams, in the Bangor area.
 
Last edited:
I have played in the APA for a very long time. When I began, there was a designation known as a S7 or Super 7. If my memory serves me correctly, an S7 had to spot 1 game to another 7 and 2 games to a 6 etc. It basically made it harder for the S7 to dominate the way you are talking about.

The designation was removed after my first year of playing.

I agree with you that it is difficult for a low end 7 to compete straight up against a high end 7 and the S7 designation would make it a little fairer without changing the 23 rule.

Leagueguy

I started playing back in 1992 and I remember a category like that. I believe in Nebraska it was a "Master's 7". If the 7 had a letter "M" by their name, they had to spot an extra game to everyone.

I don't think it would be difficult to bring that division back. Like you said, their skill level is still a 7, but in wouldn't affect the 23 rule. I'm just not sure if it was an APA wide division or if it was up left up to the LO to have a division like that in their league.
 
By the way, since we're geared for beginners and intermediate players, wouldn't it make sense that we want them to play the majority of the matches? Another reason for the senior skill level rule - to prevent 15% of the players from playing 60% of the matches.

And......another reason why the SL6-9's would want to quit APA and find another league to play in. In my experience here on this forum reading through APA threads past and present, I believe many have already done so.

Maniac
 
I have a question for anyone that can answer. Is your handicap based solely on your play or does it take into account your opponents handicap as well?? IMHO a 6 should beat a 4 in 9 ball 95% of the time but the 6 gets penalized for beating them too badly. It seems like if a 6 would 18-2 a two 4's back to back they will be raised to a 7.

I understand that APA keeps the formula for determining handicaps a secret to try to protect against sandbagging but i think its a mute point. I hear 2-3 times a week from all the teams that the way to keep your handicap down is innings and calling all your time-outs.
 
Back
Top