I’m confused- what do you mean? That one solid match against a world class player doesn’t prove much?
Are Junior players being set up for a tough life?
- Thread starter easy-e
- Start date
Close enough. Defending Strickland's choice to cruise it. The guy is hog tied in the first place. I say lettim go, lettim play.
InsertCleverNameHere
Well-known member
People don’t understand what’s coming.
OK, so one day there will be a robot that can give Filler the seven. How will this affect the game long-term?
I reacted to the attached article about the robot that broke the world record in the half marathon, thinking about how it might translate to pro pool. There's every reason to believe that a pool playing robot might greatly excel one day.
) If a bot could just manage that, people would learn what the players are trying and take it to the next level.InsertCleverNameHere
Well-known member
Correct. More of a commentary on the world and our trajectory than pool specific.
The fallout of all of this will touch all jobs, tasks and even yes our silly pursuits and activities.
To me, it's relevant to jobs for sure, doesn't matter much to sports.
I'm sure many will remember the TV show from the mid-1970s called the "Six Million Dollar Man." It was predicated on the idea that it was possible to reengineer a human being in a way that made him faster, stronger, and gave him better vision. While it all seemed pretty farfetched in the 1970s, I am starting to think it might be possible. If it is, it will have far reaching implications in many areas of life, including sports.
well it kind of puts the routine advice "go get a college education" into perspective. in three years so much have changed, that it may not be a great advice anymore. it's the white collar jobs that are predicted to go first, and are already disappearing
Your observation is what I think the OP does not take into account.
I don't care if robots play pool. I also think a lot of people will probably agree with me. I care how humans play pool or run marathons. When it comes to human competition in sports, it's not interesting to me if we design a robot to do the sport better.
The original questions was about whether young people are set up for a difficult life, because the terrible adults in their life don't prevent them from attempting to become professional pool players.
My point is this: all jobs...and I mean all jobs, but especially jobs that have previously been insulated from technological advances like entry-level white collar work--the kind young people do--will be disrupted in a negative way sooner rather than later. On top of this challenge, you have to consider the cost of obtaining the education to make people "qualified" for entry-level white collar work is extremely expensive, and it requires most people to take out loans that cannot be discharged in bankruptcy. Still further, old people are not retiring, so they are remaining in jobs to prevent middle-aged workers from advancing, and when older people do retire, they are "retiring" to lower-level jobs and working part-time sometimes--maybe the kind of jobs young people would start out with. Would an employer rather have a part-time senior employee with a career of experience or a full-time young person that has no experience?
When you consider the costs of a four-year degree, you have to consider that the market is almost demanding a graduate degree these days for white-collar work...unless your bachelors is in a field where they will allow you to pursue that during your career. Even then, many people still have to get an MBA or some kind of Masters. The real final cost of the education is the cost in money + the cost in time spent in obtaining the degree before any "real" career and earning begins. Should we encourage young people to engage in 5-7 years of expensive education for the chance to compete in a market place that prefers A.I. or older experienced workers? To me, it is a tough sell.
I agree with the sentiment that becoming a world-class pro pool player is hard. The problem is that breaking into lucrative white-collar work is also hard, and it's getting harder by the day and the prospects for this work in the future gets bleaker by the day. (in part, because of A.I.).
I agree that in the near future the trades offer an attractive answer to the problem I mentioned above. However, I live near a well-known and highly reputable trade school. Its student body gets bigger every year and not by a small amount. My little town is busting at the seems with future diesel mechanics, which is fine...for now. How many diesel mechanics do we need? I realize there is a shortage, but year after year of rising class size will chip away at this.
In the near term, most young pool players should probably be diesel mechanics or join the military (of course they might die in the military) as opposed to attempting a career on the WNT. However, we don't know the individual complexities that adorn the decisions of any particular young person. Given the changing dynamics in this area, I think it's good to acknowledge that and let people make their own choices without shouting criticism from the boomer peanut gallery.
I also think the path to being world class at any discipline is extremely hard, but information on how to get there is cheaper and easier to obtain than it has ever been.
If there is a silver lining here, maybe it's that in the future more people will play great pool and more people will enjoy watching great pool, because A.I. is doing our work...right before it kills us.
kollegedave
Badpenguin
Well-known member
Yeah, no, none of that is going to happen any time soon. AI replacing all jobs, outside of maybe some low level developer jobs, is a myth. No one is making a profit using AI or doing anything any better with AI. Actually it isn't a myth, it is fraud. It is tech companies covering up their losses or making their investors happy by laying off people. Not only that, we simply don't have the electrical grid and other infrastructure to do what these morons are claiming. There is still plenty of white collar work to be done, once this pyrafraud bubble bursts.
If a kid loves to play pool, is good at it, and has supportive parents, I say go for it! The chances at making a living at it are probably better than getting drafted into the NBA, NFL, or MLB. Look at how many parents support their kids activities in those sports. A _lot_ less competition in pool, and their heads (hopefully) aren't getting bashed in and spines compressed from childhood on.
It seems likely that you and almost anyone else knows more about A.I. than I do. However, the A.I. feature on Westlaw can write a legal memo in in less than 10 minutes. It would take me hours to do the same thing. I am hoping my employer doesn't figure that out.
kollegedave
Badpenguin
Well-known member
And at minimum courts will sanction you for it (link). It is malpractice. You ready for AI to start providing your healthcare? Driving for you?
Hell two of the richest companies on the planet can't even get the AI in their maps working right and still lead me the wrong way down one way streets, tell me streets don't exist, and so on. That is fairly mature "AI". Anyhow, off topic, I'll shut up now.
Those lawyers didn’t check the citations. They should have. However, that doesn’t mean A.I. doesn’t vastly increase the speed at which lawyers can work.