I wasnt going to say anything but I have to because I own cases from both case makers and HANDS DOWN THE JUSTIS CASE IS MADE BETTER.
The InStroke DOES mar the finish on cues. I have a Patrick that this has happened to. Secondly, my Justis case has fabric that protects the finish and I have NEVER had a scratch on my Schick or Patrick Cues. Also anyone that doesnt use JPs should see my friend and buy some, they are cheap and protect parts on your cue that when assembled are protected.
Anyone that cares, ask a cue maker such as Bill Schick what he thinks of which case for his cues. But no, I KNOW which is better and in my opinion the Justis is FIVE levels better.
Thirdly, Rich 93 and many others hit the nail on the head... The word Classless in Websters has a picture of John Barton as an example. You can type 15 more posts but JB you are looking more and more slimy, my man.
Really,
Post the proof? What happened? Did you contact Instroke about it?
Yeah, ask Bill Schick, I think that you find that Bill speaks quite highly of the GTF which has the same padded interior. We sent GTF case samples to Bill to get his opinon on them before we moved on with the production of them. Bill was entirely complimentary of the way we built the interior and the extra protection we provide.
When I owned Instroke I had a guy call me and tell me that his Instroke was causing depressions on his Cognoscenti shafts. I immediately went to my warehouse and tried to duplicate the issue using my Cog and dozens of Instroke cases.
I called the man back and said that I couldn't duplicate the problem but that if he would send his case back to me then I would be happy to take it apart and see if the case had a problem.
He did and I could duplicate the problem on my Cog shaft. Turns out the seam in the tube liner had a small knot where the seamstress had used a lighter to burn off the ends of the thread and it was right at the lip of the tube.
None of my others shafts however would get any dings on it using this same tube.
So I called Joey Gold and asked him what he thought. He said that his finish is little softer than others.
So the end result was that the one tube in the case did cause a problem and I took the case back, rebuilt it and paid for the refinish on this man's shafts.
There is no way that every case and every cue are always going to match up. You say that you had a problem then I can believe you but without the chance to duplicate it we can't know the exact nature of the problem.
In any event its definitely the
EXCEPTION rather than the rule. There is no way on the Earth that the FABRIC used in Instroke cases can scratch the finish with NORMAL USE.
As for you opinion that a Justis is five levels better you will get the opportunity on Saturday to explain what those levels are when I do a live comparison at 8pm EST on Ustream. You can join the chat and explain each point where you think Justis is better and we can then compare them side by side. I doubt you will get there but you are certainly welcome to try.
And just so you know, I don't own Instroke anymore. But when I did we sold 10,000 cases and had ONE problem where someone said the case damaged his cue. That one problem was solved as I outlined above and I didn't call anyone a liar or tell them that the case was out of warranty. In fact, I didn't even ask the guy WHERE he got the case or how long he had it. We identified the problem, made sure to enact procedures to make sure it didn't happen again and moved on.
Jack said MY current cases scratch cues. So if you think that you can prove it then feel free to try. I will prove what I have said.
The beauty of the internet is that anyone is free to make a claim and back it up. I will be backing up my claims on Saturday live on camera. It will be like the cue case porn channel with an open house in my workshop.