Balabushka

nice catch, chris

i would love to play a few racks with that cue,, BUT why, no rings at butt, 6 rings at a joint and 3 rings at joint. not a really great design. personally i think, no rings butt, no rings at a joint and just one black with stainless at joint would look cleaner.
if you wanted a buzz ring at a joint, then just one black, same at joint and butt.

AND i am not knocking the cue as i know they are great, but just looking at it design wise.,
 
desi2960 said:
i would love to play a few racks with that cue,, BUT why, no rings at butt, 6 rings at a joint and 3 rings at joint. not a really great design. personally i think, no rings butt, no rings at a joint and just one black with stainless at joint would look cleaner.
if you wanted a buzz ring at a joint, then just one black, same at joint and butt.

AND i am not knocking the cue as i know they are great, but just looking at it design wise.,
Click to expand...

The design of George's cue were 100% for a pool player, not someone that was going to just look at it.
Depending on where the player wanted the balance point etc... Rings were added to this cue most likely to forward the weight, adding a little character to the cue was just an added benefit.
 
wow wowww wow!! always nice to see these old schools! especially when they are from the great man. Thanks for sharing!!! :)

Brice
 
Soldtonight said:
Absolutely stunning exams for one of the Grandmasters. Thank you for posting it. Is this you playing cue? If it is... Good for you man.
Enjoy it in good health,
Dan Z
Click to expand...

No. I build cues so I play with one of my own. But this cue does play pretty good.
 
I was right there when you bought that cue from mark.after all this time I never got to ask you about the hit,and if it has that old school sound to it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top