Thanks Mike, rarely see them coming up for sale these days (unless I’m missing something).I don’t know about his collection but I think that it is a changing market for such cues. The target market for these cues is aging out for one. Also, the ability to resell down the road is becoming more questionable - at least from a financial investment standpoint.
The money that such cues were exchanging hands 20 years ago and even longer is actually more money than most are sold for today in comparative real value dollars.
In 1992 a former room owner that I knew sold his GB cue for $5,000 - That cue would never sell for today’s 1992 equivalent of $5,000. If it did - it would be break even at best.
Inflation calculator shows 5k in 1992 as 11.5K today.I don’t know about his collection but I think that it is a changing market for such cues. The target market for these cues is aging out for one. Also, the ability to resell down the road is becoming more questionable - at least from a financial investment standpoint.
The money that such cues were exchanging hands 20 years ago and even longer is actually more money than most are sold for today in comparative real value dollars.
In 1992 a former room owner that I knew sold his GB cue for $5,000 - That cue would never sell for today’s 1992 equivalent of $5,000. If it did - it would be break even at best.
Nice way to look at thingssome like me just own one from when he made them. and dont care what they are worth and will sell only when getting too old to have it and time to pass it on.
coming soon.
Pretty much.Got to agree with the assessments already mentioned here.
My assumption is folks that collect expensive cues generally speaking have generational capitol. So they likely do not care much about resale values.
They collect for enjoyment and because they can afford too.
One close friend is close to 80 now and for the last 8 years has been selling off his collections.
His children and grandchildren have no interest so he can enjoy selling as much as collecting!
Sure, there will always be exceptions. But if we had to bet the average or median age of current Bushka owners, and the line was 60 years old, I would bet the over.I get what some posters are saying. From strictly an investment point of view.
What they are missing is that there are at LEAST two other ways to consider the ownership.
Just as an example, I personally saw cues that sold in the past year (approx) for $55,100, $77,000,
$107,000, and orders for $120,000 and $100,000 even. That’s just in my little corner of our
genre. (Not me!). Every one of the cues involved different cuemakers and I assure you age was not an issue.
This doesn’t include the many, many cues that sold for $15k-$40k. And age is all over the place.
Don’t necessarily judge by personal experience.
Will Prout
Sure, there will always be exceptions. But if we had to bet the average or median age of current Bushka owners, and the line was 60 years old, I would bet the over.
Having said already that I intuitively understand what you are saying.Sure, there will always be exceptions. But if we had to bet the average or median age of current Bushka owners, and the line was 60 years old, I would bet the over.
I know this thread is about 'bushkas, but there's no telling what this could fetch. Mosconi's 526 Rambow from the Glenn Collection.
Yours truly holding a piece of billiards history.
Nice. There was a kid in our Chicago suburb that ordered one in I think 1964-65.... $80 new lot of money. His father was a doctor. Me, I'd rather own a Buska that played good and use it. Thx for the memories. Swank Cue Club, Roosevelt Rd. Glen Ellyn IL. 60137.... Then Gordon Hart started showing up.
View attachment 879909
was that supposed to be the cue he used or just one of his cues that has that writing on it.I know this thread is about 'bushkas, but there's no telling what this could fetch. Mosconi's 526 Rambow from the Glenn Collection.
Yours truly holding a piece of billiards history.
View attachment 879909
I understand your point too. I didn't quite understand the introduction of analogies to other random correlations because the discussion started around just age. The age of 60 was simply my guess as a decent starting point in a hypothetical bet to one side or the other of 60 (the over / under). I stated I would take the over (that's just me, others may take the under...and maybe they would be correct). I don't believe I ever stated in absolutes the average age for Bushka owners was "60". If I did, then you would be correct, I would have no way on planet earth of knowing that. Similarly, you also would have no way on planet earth to definitively state an age either.Having said already that I intuitively understand what you are saying.
I would also say I have no way on Planet Earth to understand and agree with the number 60.
Pulled from somewhere, but I am clueless where you got it.
What percentage of Bushka owners are right-handed?
How many are married?
How many take their cue to a poolroom?
How many are women?
How many are over 180 pounds?
How many live east of the Mississippi?
How many Bushka owners also own a Szamboti?
How many have been to Valley Forge at least once?
How many Bushkas have been sold since 2020 Covid started?
How many…….
Again, if you hear me you know I get your point. Just find declarative statements fuzzy.
People use your argument with sports cars. Have you followed Mecum?
……………………………………. Guns.
…………………………………..…Coins.
………………………………………Stamps. Rare pool tables. Etc….not exceptions. Really not.
Btw, I sold a 1995 Josswest a couple hours ago for $12,000 to a fine young man.
Will Prout