.....
.....
.....
Last edited:
[...]Some reason multi quote didn't stay.
On a machine I built for Jerry McWorter back in the 90's I bought a manual 5C-collet indexer for $160 new. It was an Asian import that closely resembled the Haas indexer of that period. The same class of indexer can be purchased for just over $200 today: www.ebay.com/itm/SHARS-VERTICAL-HOR...6693801?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item518ced
Would not even look at getting something like that to run cnc. ?
I bought a large worm and worm-gear set from Stock Drive Products for another $125 or so. I took my own Haas indexer apart and studied th construction, then I machined similar housing and mounts for the imported indexer. FWIW, the Haas indexers of that era were built the same way, from an existing manual indexer.
I just make my own that does the job that people need
I added a NEMA 34 motor mount and a stepper motor, creating a CNC indexer that was every bit as accurate as my Hass for under $300 total parts cost and 2 days work. The same job could be accomplished today for well under $500, so it is HARDLY necessary to spend "$8000" to end up with a high-precision worm-gear indexer.
You said Haas and that about the lowest price one
McWorter used that indexer for many, many years before upgrading to an indexer with a larger through hole than 5C allows. but as far as I know the indexer is still working fine for the new owner.
Okay... except that the servo-driven belt and pulley set ups found on "almost every machine" are NOT being used to index parts. They're being used to drive linear axes by turning ballscrews. The "rigidity" of those applications comes from the angular contact bearings holding the ball-screws, NOT from the belt and pulley drive aspect.
OK you have me at a bit of a lose ? I was stating about stay belt stretch and lose accuracy as you posted.. The 4th axis has double row angular contact bearing in each end? The very same as a ballscrew end set up
So, just to be clear, "almost every machine" is NOT using servo-driven belt and pulley systems for indexing - that is decidedly what would referred to as a "home/hobby" solution.
You need to read what i write if you want to post about it. you will not find very many servos on any machine that is not using belt and pulley for reduction.
Home and hobby have noting to do with belt and pulley?
Everything if for CNC
TW
(PS: I routinely machine metal parts on my 4-axis machine for jigs, drive centers, and other tool-related items. I can't imagine getting the clean accurate results I get if I was using aluminum timing pulleys and rubber belts to rotate and index those parts.)
Here, I'll give you a hand:
The original poster asked what would be the BEST 4th axis for under $1000. Beyond any shadow, timing pulleys and a timing belt cannot possibly be classified as "the best". I understand you want to peddle your products, and are willing to make claims that may be exaggerated a bit in order to do that, but on the list of ways to build an indexer your preferred method is NOT ranked anywhere near the top.
As for the $8000 you claim all Haas indexers cost, I know of several cuemakers who have bought them used for under $1000, and I gave a pretty clear example of a very similar one I built for under $300 (plus my time). Currently, used Haas indexers WITH CNC CONTROLLER AND MOTOR can routinely be purchased on eBay for under $4000.
Additionally, harmonic drive indexers can be had for well under $1000 as well - though I do worry that the shell gear in such an indexer may not hold up over the long haul. Only time will tell in that regard.
As a cuemaker who has almost certainly done more with 4-axis work than anyone else, my opinion does come from a long history of experience. Also, I have nothing to gain in this discussion since I am not attempting to sell anything to anybody. I my opinion, anyone accepting a belt-driven indexer is settling for a lesser solution, so I really hope the price will be very low. If not, I sincerely hope they will investigate the superior alternatives that are out there.
TW
I'm not trying to peddle anything, there no even made yet lol . I have never said belt and pulley is the best? Harmonic drive is .As i tell everyone wanting to get one, there is lots on ebay. But everyone still waits. If they didn't work, i would not sell. Thats the bottom line.
Again if wanting high end 4th axis it would be harmonic drive, then lower cost belt and pulley.
Instead of wasting time on useless talk, make them and sell them. There is a huge market for them. Then i would not have to make them .
Here is video for you to check out
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bzRh672peNk
Here is also a belt and pulley , as you can see no problem doing anything . Its almost same going on lathe headstock
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TlQgMk6te_Y
does nobody realize we are building pool cues.what we do is a luxury to our customers. if its within .0002 or .0005 it does not matter. I build more more cues than any one man cue business builds in a year. I have more more cnc machines than any other cue maker including Thomas waste. I meant wayne. we are not saving lives we are building cues that you play a game with. lets put this into perspective.
thanks for the time
Robert Harris
Hi George,
Can you point me to a commercial 4th axis which utilizes a harmonic drive?
The only ones i can seem to find are ones that hobbyist have made or imports from ebay.
Cute "comeback", George. Very cute.
The only problem is, the InTurn belt-drive 4th-axis indexer in that video has a base price of $2,950.00, and if you want sealed bearings it jumps up to 3,795.00. Same device with tapered roller bearings is a whopping $4,995.00!
Not exactly an example of "best indexer for under $1,000", now is it? Unless you claim you'll be offering all the features of that InTurn indexer for 1/3 the price or less.
So I guess the question is, WILL YOU be offering that quality for a very low price... say, under $1,000?
TW
Here is the first one made last year or maybe even 2 years ago . just never had time to make them . Works with out a problem ,even up to 1/2 end mill .This one was for testing,ones for sale will look different on outside
![]()
![]()
Not to put too fine a point on it, but what you're showing here is a FAR cry from the InTurn unit you linked to earlier. Very much like comparing a Walmart tricycle to a BMW K1600.
http://www.theinturn.com/
TW
I am not an experienced machinist, just a basement hobbiest guy, and cannot comment on the other options, but I have one of the 50:1 harmonic drive 4th axis units from ebay and it works fine for me, with virtually no backlash. I have noticed that some ebay sellers advertise their belt-driven units as 'harmonic' drives, obviously in error. I have disassembled mine and confirmed it is indeed built upon the strain wave concept. There were less expensive versions than mine, which, shipping included, was around $400 with an 80 mm chuck.
FWIW
mac
Jake, the seller's name I bought from is "hotsale-eshop" but he/they no longer have these listed. This one in the link below looks to me to be the same setup:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/CNC-4th-Axi...t=LH_DefaultDomain_0&var=&hash=item3aa802e71e
(hope the link works....if if doesn't, let me know and I'll try again.)
Thanks much for comment! I thought it was pretty decent, but am not a machinist person. Got lucky, I guess.
mac
Of course it don't look like it. lol That's bolt on 4th axis for cnc router not headstock for a cnc lathe.
Would look very small on cnc lathe when its 4x9 inch profile lol
As i told you before, you really need to read before you post absurd stuff .
Hey, YOU"RE the one who posted the Youtube link to support your contention that belt drive is as good as anything else. If referring to it AFTER YOU FIRST DID is "absurd" then you need to go look in a mirror to find the culprit, buddy.
TW
(PS: English is my first language, so maybe that's the problem here.)