This post has expired.
Last edited:
Best ld shaft.
- Thread starter THE FLASH
- Start date
Why not have an LD Shaft Sub-Fourm?
For me it is definitely Mezz alpha shaft, there's no question in my mind that its the best LD Shaft FOR ME.
I've used Predator, 314, and Z, I've used tiger the X-pro (Forgot its name) None has worked out for me, the mezz worked out really well, but let me tell you, a shaft thats best for me doesn't mean its best for you, or someone else, it can differ, because in the end it all comes down to personal preference, period.
and thats why you will see each individual in here tell you another name I am guessing even thought I didn't read all the thread yet.
I've used Predator, 314, and Z, I've used tiger the X-pro (Forgot its name) None has worked out for me, the mezz worked out really well, but let me tell you, a shaft thats best for me doesn't mean its best for you, or someone else, it can differ, because in the end it all comes down to personal preference, period.
and thats why you will see each individual in here tell you another name I am guessing even thought I didn't read all the thread yet.
I was just providing a example where technology allows the players to play at a higher level. You don't need to comprehend the golf, just the idea behind the example.
As far as your second point goes I would say the contruction on a OB shaft is pretty radical, even compared with the changes to golf equipment.
Check it out-
http://www.obcues.com/pages/Consistency.html
What he said!
LD shaft
Yes, and your answer makes perfect sense, IMO. I have tried several LD shafts and I can't honestly say I could tell much difference between them except the difference in taper, tip diameter etc. In other words the obvious physical difference. However, if I'm with a group who, like me, has spent this obscene amount of money for this tiny amount of wood, I try to intellectualize the benefits. Otherwise, it would make me appear more dense than I am. Of all the LD shafts I've tried the Jacoby Hybrid (I bought three of different tip diameters and one is 30") is my favorite. It just feels good! Like the others it hasn't improved my game, lol. Only dedicated practice and committment will do that. I made many shafts from old growth wood with no ferrules and IMO they play and feel as good as any shafts I own.
Yes, and your answer makes perfect sense, IMO. I have tried several LD shafts and I can't honestly say I could tell much difference between them except the difference in taper, tip diameter etc. In other words the obvious physical difference. However, if I'm with a group who, like me, has spent this obscene amount of money for this tiny amount of wood, I try to intellectualize the benefits. Otherwise, it would make me appear more dense than I am. Of all the LD shafts I've tried the Jacoby Hybrid (I bought three of different tip diameters and one is 30") is my favorite. It just feels good! Like the others it hasn't improved my game, lol. Only dedicated practice and committment will do that. I made many shafts from old growth wood with no ferrules and IMO they play and feel as good as any shafts I own.
the best ? i do not know
but, for a really great shaft, find yourself a very dense old growth high ring count shaft, have a builder, bore and fill with balsa wood the first 4-5 inches of the tip end of the shaft. DO not use a ferrule, just a carbon fiber pad and a 11 layer pigskin tip.
but, for a really great shaft, find yourself a very dense old growth high ring count shaft, have a builder, bore and fill with balsa wood the first 4-5 inches of the tip end of the shaft. DO not use a ferrule, just a carbon fiber pad and a 11 layer pigskin tip.
You may do yourself a favor by searching Dr. Daves site for information about "pivot point" and "back hand English". The pivot point of the LD shaft and length of your bridge from the cue ball to your bridge may be an important consideration in shaft selection.
By the way, an earlier post stated that there is more deflection with speed. Dr. Daves site demonstrates that this is not true.
By the way, an earlier post stated that there is more deflection with speed. Dr. Daves site demonstrates that this is not true.