I'm merely responding to any new posts, like yours right now. I'm ready to start a totally new thread right now about teammates in general. That one could end-up being more lively than this one...I think the OP should go on Oprah, to expose to the world this injustice he suffered .
But to judge by this thread it would have to be a 6 hour interview.
This thread is a sad testament to the APAI'm merely responding to any new posts, like yours right now. I'm ready to start a totally new thread right now about teammates in general. That one could end-up being more lively than this one...
This thread has pretty much run it's course anyways...
Except our league isn't APA at all.This thread is a sad testament to the APA
I don’t understand. You say the only way you could get first place was to beat the weaker player 3-0. If you play the stronger player wouldn’t you have a chance to gain 3 wins while giving him three losses? If you beat the 2nd guy 3-0 and the first guy beats your teammate 2-1 or 3-0 you can’t pick up any ground.I beat him 2-1. The first game, he missed a tough opening shot in the side, and I ran out. The next game, I missed a tough opening shot, and he ran out. The third game, we had a safety battle that I won, and I ran out.
I am NOT a favorite to beat their best player more than 2 games out of 3. And as you know, a dry break or any number of things could have let him beat me 2 or 3 games. But since their number 2 player can't really run out, I'm a huge favorite to beat him all 3 games.
If I beat their second best player 3-0 and got a table run or two, I would have been right behind the guy all alone in first place. And realistically, that was the ONLY way I could have possibly had a crack at first place, was to play the guy that I could beat 3-0.
Once I no longer had a chance to get first place as an individual and because the captain lied to my face, I decided to stop playing on this team. I let them split my money between them and my teammate and the captain now took second and third place in the league. Extra money and trophies for them. That's exactly what they wanted, so I gave it to them. The team took first place in the league too. Our team was ahead the whole way, so that wasn't really ever at risk.
No, this wasn't the top player in the LEAGUE, he was the top player on the other team. In the league this guy is in 11th place. So my teammate, who wanted to be second in the entire league, absolutely refused to play the guy in 11th place.I don’t understand. You say the only way you could get first place was to beat the weaker player 3-0. If you play the stronger player wouldn’t you have a chance to gain 3 wins while giving him three losses? If you beat the 2nd guy 3-0 and the first guy beats your teammate 2-1 or 3-0 you can’t pick up any ground.
If I had a chance to put 3 losses on the top player and overtake him I would jump at the chance.
An additional bonus is that if your teammate beat the weaker player 3-0 then you two would finish 1-2 (him first if you had more games) and the stronger player would finish 3rd. What a heroic night for the team!
But you’d rather create drama over a coin flip that you two weren’t even authorized to do.
I'm merely responding to any new posts, like yours right now. I'm ready to start a totally new thread right now about teammates in general. That one could end-up being more lively than this one...
This thread has pretty much run it's course anyways...
Oh sorry I totally misunderstood that part.No, this wasn't the top player in the LEAGUE, he was the top player on the other team. In the league this guy is in 11th place. So my teammate, who wanted to be second in the entire league, absolutely refused to play the guy in 11th place.
I just wanted to play whoever the coin flip decided. (fair) Hoping that I would have a chance to play a guy that I could get 3 wins from and maybe get first place in the league.
BTW, once I left the team, this teammate did take second place and our captain took third place in the league. So it all worked out exactly the way they wanted in the end.
No I typically play against everyone in the league. 5 vs 5, full round robin, single game.Well that helps to explain a lot of your comments. You typically play against 2/3s and yet you call me a coward for wanting to play the second best player on the other team. SMH. I know, I know, it's not up to you...
That's fair enough. I just thought of one other thing that happened in my match with their strongest player. Just to try to demonstrate my desire for fairness.No I typically play against everyone in the league. 5 vs 5, full round robin, single game.
I stopped playing CPA(APA) a couple of years ago, because opposing captains would sacrifice their bottom end to save their guns, or the top shooters would do what you did and avoid playing me at all costs so they could maintain a bloated average.
The difference between you and me, is I would have never given let the decision to play the top shooter go to a coin flip. I would have politely offerred the match to my team mate letting him know beforehand that I'd be more than willing to take on the match. If he wanted it, he could have it. Otherwise I'd go at him (opponent) full guns blasting... I want the tough game, but I respect my team mates enough to give them the option.
Whatever it is it sucks.Except our league isn't APA at all.
That's why I'm moving leagues to one where every player on each team plays each other once each night. There is no way for the captain or anyone else to screw over a player with the playing order.Whatever it is it sucks.
Don't go counting your horses just yet. This new league sounds more similar to my own. In this format the amount of breaks a player gets in a night is dependant on their position in the order.That's why I'm moving leagues to one where every player on each team plays each other once each night. There is no way for the captain or anyone else to screw over a player with the playing order.
Who cares about the break. Look at the stats. If there is any advantage with breaking, it isn't much if anything. I know my stance with gifting one player second place wouldn't be popular, but it's still a fact.Don't go counting your horses just yet. This new league sounds more similar to my own. In this format the amount of breaks a player gets in a night is dependant on their position in the order.
I suspect we may just see another "captian burnt me" thread in another year![]()
I just hope that if any captains read this that at least one of them realize that if you're at the end of the season and two players are tied, and extra money, trophies, and an extra tournament are on the line, and neither play volunteers to play the strongest player -- you FLIP A COIN. If you arbitrarily assign one player who to play, then you are injecting bias and favoritism into the situation where it doesn't need to be added and where there is no benefit to the team regardless of who plays who.
Like I said, I know that I'm correct about this. It doesn't matter to me if the majority disagree. I know that guy's and especially pool players have huge egos. In fact, you must have a big ego IMO to excel at pool. It's what helps drive a player to get better.Given that the majority of responses in this thread disagree with you, and agree with the captain‘s decision, I’m guessing you might be disappointed in their response too.
Just sayin’...
A couple questions. Most amount of break and runs you have had in a league session? Most you have seen from another player? The break absolutely matters.Who cares about the break. Look at the stats. If there is any advantage with breaking, it isn't much if anything. I know my stance with gifting one player second place wouldn't be popular, but it's still a fact.
I just hope that if any captains read this that at least one of them realize that if you're at the end of the season and two players are tied, and extra money, trophies, and an extra tournament are on the line, and neither play volunteers to play the strongest player -- you FLIP A COIN. If you arbitrarily assign one player who to play, then you are injecting bias and favoritism into the situation where it doesn't need to be added and where there is no benefit to the team regardless of who plays who.
This league does not count break and runs. Only table runs. A table run being that all 15 balls are still on the table when you start your turn at the table and it must be your first time to the table. I think the most I've had was 8 table runs. And four 8-ball breaks. The most I've seen by the top player I think was 12 table runs.A couple questions. Most amount of break and runs you have had in a league session? Most you have seen from another player? The break absolutely matters.
IMO there is no such thing as a tie between two players at the end of the season. There are plenty of statistical categories that could be used before resorting to flipping a coin. Nights played/games played, average, wins, losses, points won, points lost and that differential.
The break doesn't determine who wins the game? I have seen many a times where the flip/lag determines who wins a match.This league does not count break and runs. Only table runs. A table run being that all 15 balls are still on the table when you start your turn at the table. I think the most I've had was 8 table runs. And four 8-ball breaks. On average, the break doesn't determine who wins the game. The breaker and the person who didn't break typically win a very similar number of the games, even using pro stats. The breaker only has a small advantage from the stats I've seen.
In this league, if two people have the exact same average at the end of the season, they count it as a tie. Trust me, I asked. There might be many different ways to break a tie, but in this league, they don't do that. I agree that it makes no sense, but that's how they do it in this league.
I meant, if two players are playing say a race to 10. The stats that At Large posts indicate that the person who broke is only a small favorite to win each game (on average).Sometimes
The break doesn't determine who wins the game? I have seen many a times where the flip/lag determines who wins a match.