JLW said:
I have nothing against jumping balls, I just feel that it should be done (especially at the professional level) with a pool cue.
Ummm...isn't a jump cue technically a "pool cue"? I mean, what else do you use it for, besides playing pool?
JLW said:
It doesn't have anything to do with my proficiency at pool.
Uh, of course it does. If you use one, and you're good at using it, your proficiency is better. Duh. :idea2:
JLW said:
It's just that, IMHO, the game is more pure when it's played that way. If you're a recreational player who likes playing with a jump cue, go for it! More power to ya.
"More pure"?
Give me a break!
What about jump/break cues that unscrew at the wrap area? Are those "more" or "less pure"? Should we "vote to outlaw" those too? What exactly the heck is "more pure", anyway? :scratchhead: 9-ball "ball in hand" was added to speed the game up for TV matches. Didn't that make it "less pure"? Are you in favor of voting to ban that, too?
JimS said:
BPG24 said:
They take away from the strategy of the game and make knowledge of the diamond system for kicking almost useless unless you are frozen to a ball
That's my take on them also. I'd vote for the ban... if I had a vote.
Odd, I don't see the post by BPG24 that you quoted? Anyway, how does it "take away from the strategy" or "make knowledge of the diamond system for kicking almost useless unless you are frozen to a ball"? If you can jump and make the hit and/or drop the ball, that's what matters.
hang-the-9 said:
The dedicated jump sticks are too easy to use. We had a guy try one, never used it before and he jumped a full ball very near the cue ball. How does that help to advance the game?
Ummm....by allowing him to play better?
hang-the-9 said:
...Jumping with your play cue takes skill, that should be as legal in tournaments as a kick. While it's true that technology of the game advances, it should do so to make things more consistent instead of easier.
Well, we should probably vote for a ban on low-deflection shafts, too, shouldn't we? Those don't make things "more consistent", they make them EASIER. (Of course, that's probably a different debate for a different time, but still...) Gee, if we want to be "more pure", I guess we should not allow phenolic tips...or gloves. I mean, no one wore a glove back in the day, when it was still a "pure" game, right? :banghead: Heck, maybe we should require that all "professional" players use Ivory ferrules. That's "pure", right?
hang-the-9 said:
...I'd rather have rubber and cloth that reacts the same way all the time than have a "auto-bank" rubber that lights up in the spot you need to hit for a bank. Same for tips, shafts, etc... more consistency but not gimmicks to make the game easier.
So I take it you don't use laminated tips, and instead stick to solid one-piece leather tips?
I mean, they're also something "new" that evolved, and don't make things "more consistent", but instead make things (tip maintenance, et. al) easier (again, probably a different debate for another time.)
Eh...most of the comments in this thread are some of the most ridiculous ones I've seen in a long time. "More pure".... :rotflmao1: