Book Finally Coming?

That's interesting. Some of your acolytes have been telling us that your book was "at the publisher" and that release date was out of you hands. At least this thread cleared up that misconception.

At a publishing services company that leads to an actual publishing company.

Connie Shuffett
 
I've heard this before. And it very well might be true. Of course I sweep into the shots, but I know it's not based on an exact halftip offset from one of 2 or 3 CTE perceptions. I honestly believe Hal Houle meant that every shot when using CTE is within half a tip from the shot line, not exactly half a tip every time.

Anyway, it'll be interesting to see the book and truth series. I'm not too stubborn to recognize and accept valid points and logical explanations when I see them.

The 1/2 tip offset works.
A half ball offset works.
Stan will explain exactly how they work in his Truth Series.

Connie Shuffett
 
Last edited:
Stan made no bones about how I was posting. If you’re just now catching on, I feel sorry for you.

Contractors have taken over our house. Stan and I have been forced into a small utility room all day today. Actually, they just left for the day. It’s over real soon and I will be through with posting for a good spell. It’s been interesting, though. I have learned a lot about what Stan has said to be true about the Aiming Police.

Connie Shuffett

and we've learned that Stan's wife is just as slippery as Stan.
 
The 1/2 tip offset works.
A half ball offset works.
Stan will explain exactly how they work in his Truth Series.

Connie Shuffett

As long as the explanation isn't the same words Hal coined years ago, the whole 2x4 playing surface with 8 90° angles, etc... I won't badger Stan though if he plans on sticking with those same old talking points as the "explanation" for how it works. That's already been through the ringer enough over the years. I'll quit pestering you too now. Have a good week.
 
As long as the explanation isn't the same words Hal coined years ago, the whole 2x4 playing surface with 8 90° angles, etc... I won't badger Stan though if he plans on sticking with those same old talking points as the "explanation" for how it works. That's already been through the ringer enough over the years. I'll quit pestering you too now. Have a good week.

The 2:1 is necessary for CTE PRO ONE. Won’t work consistently without the 2:1 and eight right angles.
2:1 is not necessary for contact points, ghost ball and fractions.
Have a good weekend!

Connie Shuffett
 
As long as the explanation isn't the same words Hal coined years ago, the whole 2x4 playing surface with 8 90° angles, etc... I won't badger Stan though if he plans on sticking with those same old talking points as the "explanation" for how it works. That's already been through the ringer enough over the years. I'll quit pestering you too now. Have a good week.

When you question scientific assertions it is called peer review. When you question a religion it is called heresy. You know not of what you speak, and all that. :)
 
No, that's not what happened.

And here's the problem with your version: JB had been using CTE, and later Pro1, for years. He made and posted dozens of youtube videos telling the world how wonderful it was. Then weeks before our match he got 15 hours of personal instruction from Stan.

IOWs, he was not starting from scratch, but with years and years of using the system under his belt. (If you listen carefully to whatever copy of the match is still floating out there in cyberspace you can hear John crow about the wondrous virtues of the system when he hits a couple of shots.) When he visited Stan at your home John was just getting the finishing touches to years of experience with your aiming system. And then, after he lost, all this baloney started coming out about not enough time, using his own version -- not Stan's version, blah, blah, blah. John was totally disavowed and thrown under the Pro1 bus by Stan.

Which highlights another issue: if someone like JB -- a long time system user -- cannot learn and deploy the system after 15 hours of personal instruction from Stan himself, what chance does the average guy out there trying to learn from DVDs and a book have? I'll answer that for you: none.

Lou Figueroa

John didn't lose because of any aiming system. It's very clear he had some stroke and mechanical issues. You've posted the meme several hundred times.
 
C'mon, Connie,

You're a Mom. Can't you give us just a little hint? Will it be ready by Christmas? Gee whiz, what are we gonna do for stocking stuffers?

C'mon Mom! You can tell us.

See this is the kind of post that someone can make on an anonymous forum all the while thinking, i hope they never figure out my real name. Isn't that right Richard Boxcar, you disrespectful little piece of sh......
 
I've heard this before. And it very well might be true. Of course I sweep into the shots, but I know it's not based on an exact halftip offset from one of 2 or 3 CTE perceptions. I honestly believe Hal Houle meant that every shot when using CTE is within half a tip from the shot line, not exactly half a tip every time.

Anyway, it'll be interesting to see the book and truth series. I'm not too stubborn to recognize and accept valid points and logical explanations when I see them.

Hal taught a half ball pivot, like Cowboy Jimmy Moore is using
 
Stan just speaks the truth about what actually happened.
You are nothing but a spin artist. The truth does not suit your purposes.

You wouldn’t dare undertake a new aiming system a couple of weeks out from an event.
You know what that’d do to anyone’s game.
Stan forewarned John during a phone conversation about taking on a new system so close to the match, but John insisted on the lesson just the same.

Perhaps John will see this thread and chime in.

Connie Shuffett


I'm fine with the truth and the truth is: JB was a CTE fan for close to two decades before our match -- his time with Stan should have just been icing on the cake.

Lou Figueroa
but there is no cake
 
John went to New Orleans and the Expo after his lesson. John said he was not able to practice PRO ONE leading into the match.

Are you so ignorant that you think people in the know believe that John had PRO ONE down for the match? Or do you think you can spin that so people buy it?

Connie Shuffett


Two decades of CTE, dozens of youtube videos, two DVDs, and 15 hours with Stan at your house.

Lou Figueroa
ah, yes
 
I'm fine with the truth and the truth is: JB was a CTE fan for close to two decades before our match -- his time with Stan should have just been icing on the cake.

Lou Figueroa
but there is no cake

I see your point but that was not how the cookie crumbled.

Connie Shuffett
 
Exactly! John stuck to what he knew, but in all honesty he probably got crossed up a bit because of his recent PRO ONE lesson that likely reared it’s head from time to time.

John had his version of manual CTE down to some degree. What Stan taught and what John had down was not the same.

Manual CTE and PRO ONE are night and day in how they are applied. Two totally different CTE PRO ONE approaches that yield the same shot line.

Lou had a huge advantage on that match skill-wise going in. Even at that, John made a good match out of it.

Lou was a 100 ball runner and a seasoned one pocket player. John showed a lot of heart taking that super tough match. If the shoes were reversed skill-wise, you could not have gotten Lou to the table with a gun to his head.

Connie Shuffett


Baloney -- JB thought he had the nuts.

JB Cases said:
When I win the first thing I will do is jelly up my team and then spend the rest on a vacation in the Maldives.


JB Cases said:
Whatever the bet is at the end of the day it means nothing compared to the humiliation of Lou losing to me. When I win I might just buy everyone in the audience aiming systems lessons.

Lou Figueroa
 
Total di.. post

Reread all of the posts in this thread and tell me who has thrown out the most (and first) personal insults. Hint: It's the lady who describes herself as "sassy but still classy." I'm sure in real life she is a terrific person, but in this forum she sounds and acts a lot like Stan, down to the habit of editing almost every post after sending it.
 
You’d get lost with the visual instructions in a hurry. Stan is talking about how to use one’s vision for the whole process. You’re not there and won’t be there until after his Truth Series. And then it will take much time to know it because true knowledge comes from experience, something that you do not have at this time. You have never knowingly experienced real CTE.

On a closing note, Stan thinks you’re closer to using CTE than you are to using fractions. That’s another story. Stan will explain that in his Truth Series down the line.

Connie Shuffett


One has to wonder: if Connie/Stan are telling Brian -- who has published his own very understandable aiming system -- that he doesn't get CTE, how is the average player ever going to get it?

Lou Figueroa
 
Two decades of CTE, dozens of youtube videos, two DVDs, and 15 hours with Stan at your house.

Lou Figueroa
ah, yes

Stan’s two DVDs are important works with great information that started the process of getting CTE on track. Plus, Stan’s instructions were very good, but less than perfect. Perfect does matter.

Exact CTE has been elusive to every player on the planet for 20 years. Stan’s work has steadily paved the way for all of that to end. It’s coming to an end relatively soon and it’s all been worth it.

Stan’s Truth Series will “tell all” and will be free to all.

Connie Shuffett
 
Back
Top