Break Stats -- Steinway Classic 10-Ball, August 2013

AtLarge

AzB Gold Member
Gold Member
Silver Member
Here are some break statistics from eleven 10-ball matches streamed by Inside Pool from the 2nd Annual Steinway Classic at Steinway Billiards in New York City (Astoria, Queens) from 8/25/2013 - 8/27/2013.

The conditions for this event included: Brunswick Gold Crown 9-foot table with corner pockets measuring about 5.1" at the mouth, new Championship cloth, Delta-13 metal rack, winner breaks, rack your own, break from anywhere behind the line, jump cues allowed, and Predator Tour rules (call shot, call safety).

The 11 matches (181 games) were as follows:
  • S Van Boening def. S. Moore 9-4
  • E. Strickland d. T. Robles 9-8
  • R. Eckert d. D. Hatch 9-8
  • E. Strickland d. W. Kiamco 9-4
  • S. Cohen d. M. Vergara 9-6 (but these statistics exclude one game when the stream was down)
  • S. Van Boening d. Shaun Wilke 9-3
  • S. Van Boening d. J. Shaw 9-2
  • E. Strickland d. O. Ortmann 9-4
  • E. Strickland d. W. Kiamco 9-8
  • E. Strickland D. J. Shaw 15-13 (Semi-Finals)
  • S. Van Boening d. E. Strickland 15-11 (Finals)

Overall results -- The breaker made at least one ball (and did not foul) 55% of the time (99 of 181 games), won 46% of the games (84 of 181), and broke and ran 18% of the games (33 of 181).

Here's a little more detailed breakdown of the 181 games.

Breaker made at least one ball and did not foul:​
Breaker won the game: 58 (32% of the 181 games)​
Breaker lost the game: 41 (23%)​
Breaker fouled on the break:​
Breaker won the game: 5 (3%)​
Breaker lost the game: 10 (6%)​
Breaker broke dry (without fouling):​
Breaker won the game: 21 (12%)​
Breaker lost the game: 46 (25%)​
Therefore, whereas the breaker won 46% (84 of 181) of all games,​
He won 59% (58 of 99) of the games in which he made at least one ball on the break and did not foul.​
He won 33% (5 of 15) of the games in which he fouled on the break.​
He won 31% (21 of 67) of the games in which he broke dry but did not foul.​
He won 32% (26 of 82) of the games in which he either fouled on the break or broke dry without fouling.​

10-balls on the break: The 10-ball was made on the break 8 times (including 4 times in the final match) in the 181 games, but it did not count as a win and was spotted. The breaker continued shooting if there was no foul on the break.
 
Last edited:
Thanx for the info......I always read your stats.

Incidentally, could you give the break stats for the previous straight pool tournament?
:)
 
The 11 matches covered in post #1 involved 12 different players. Here's how Shane Van Boening did compared to the other 11 players combined.

Made at least one ball on the break and did not foul:
Shane -- 78% (31 of 40)​
Other 11 players -- 48% (68 of 141)​
Total -- 55% (99 of 181)​

Won the game when breaking:
Shane -- 63% (25 of 40)​
Other 11 players -- 42% (59 of 141)​
Total -- 46% (84 of 181)​

Break-and-run games:
Shane -- 35% (14 of 40)​
Other 11 players -- 13% (19 of 141)​
Total -- 18% (33 of 181)​

Is it any wonder Shane won the tournament?
 
Last edited:
When Shane gets that break going he just steam rolls. He just seems to keep getting better and better
 
Here are some break statistics from eleven 10-ball matches streamed by Inside Pool from the 2nd Annual Steinway Classic at Steinway Billiards in New York City (Astoria, Queens) from 8/25/2013 - 8/27/2013.

The conditions for this event included: Brunswick Gold Crown 9-foot table with corner pockets measuring about 5.1" at the mouth, new Championship cloth, Delta-13 metal rack, winner breaks, rack your own, break from anywhere behind the line, jump cues allowed, and Predator Tour rules (call shot, call safety).

The 11 matches (181 games) were as follows:

  • S Van Boening def. S. Moore 9-4
  • E. Strickland d. T. Robles 9-8
  • R. Eckert d. D. Hatch 9-8
  • E. Strickland d. W. Kiamco 9-4
  • S. Cohen d. M. Vergara 9-6 (but these statistics exclude one game when the stream was down)
  • S. Van Boening d. Shaun Wilke 9-3
  • S. Van Boening d. J. Shaw 9-2
  • E. Strickland d. O. Ortmann 9-4
  • E. Strickland d. W. Kiamco 9-8
  • E. Strickland D. J. Shaw 15-13 (Semi-Finals)
  • S. Van Boening d. E. Strickland 15-11 (Finals)

Overall results -- The breaker made at least one ball (and did not foul) 55% of the time (99 of 181 games), won 46% of the games (84 of 181), and broke and ran 18% of the games (33 of 181).

Here's a little more detailed breakdown of the 181 games.

Breaker made at least one ball and did not foul:
  • Breaker won the game: 58 (32% of the 181 games)
  • Breaker lost the game: 41 (23%)

Breaker fouled on the break:
  • Breaker won the game: 5 (3%)
  • Breaker lost the game: 10 (6%)

Breaker broke dry (without fouling):
  • Breaker won the game: 21 (12%)
  • Breaker lost the game: 46 (25%)

Therefore, whereas the breaker won 46% (84 of 181) of all games,
- He won 59% (58 of 99) of the games in which he made at least one ball on the break and did not foul.
- He won 33% (5 of 15) of the games in which he fouled on the break.
- He won 31% (21 of 67) of the games in which he broke dry but did not foul.
- He won 32% (26 of 82) of the games in which he either fouled on the break or broke dry without fouling.​


10-balls on the break: The 10-ball was made on the break 8 times (including 4 times in the final match) in the 181 games, but it did not count as a win and was spotted. The breaker continued shooting if there was no foul on the break.

umm, He beat the crap out of me 9-1. I was his first match after his first round bye. He broke dry 3 times. 6 out of the 9 games he won were B&R. He missed one ball the entire match aside from the dry breaks.

I believe he mad 3 balls on the break 4 times and 4 balls four times.

I'll get him next time. ;)


Ron Mason
 
umm, He beat the crap out of me 9-1. I was his first match after his first round bye. He broke dry 3 times. 6 out of the 9 games he won were B&R. He missed one ball the entire match aside from the dry breaks.

I believe he mad 3 balls on the break 4 times and 4 balls four times.

I'll get him next time. ;)


Ron Mason

Oops, sorry, my bad. I thought you were only talking about Shane's matches. Maybe next time I will read the entire post.

Ron Mason
 
Oops, sorry, my bad. I thought you were only talking about Shane's matches. Maybe next time I will read the entire post.

Ron Mason

Post #3 is basically about Shane. Thanks for telling us how your match (not streamed) went with him.
 
Thanx for the info......I always read your stats.

Incidentally, could you give the break stats for the previous straight pool tournament?
:)

Happy to oblige. Of the 24 matches I watched over the course of the 6-day 14.1 event, the breaker never made a ball on the break (except the CB once), but he won 50% of the games (12 of 24). :)
 
Last edited:
The 11 matches covered in post #1 involved 12 different players. Here's how Shane Van Boening did compared to the other 11 players combined.

Made at least one ball on the break and did not foul:
  • Shane -- 78% (31 of 40)
  • Other 11 players -- 48% (68 of 141)
  • Total -- 55% (99 of 181)

Won the game when breaking:
  • Shane -- 63% (25 of 40)
  • Other 11 players -- 42% (59 of 141)
  • Total -- 46% (84 of 181)

Break-and-run games:
  • Shane -- 35% (14 of 40)
  • Other 11 players -- 13% (19 of 141)
  • Total -- 18% (33 of 181)

Is it any wonder Shane won the tournament?

These Shane stats are so lopsided vs the field, it's hard to wrap my head around. It's not like he was playing against the Girl Scouts.

I watched many of the streams. The difference in his break vs others is a monumental advantage. I blame Corey. :grin-square:

Congrats to Shane!
 
The 11 matches covered in post #1 involved 12 different players. Here's how Shane Van Boening did compared to the other 11 players combined.

Made at least one ball on the break and did not foul:
  • Shane -- 78% (31 of 40)
  • Other 11 players -- 48% (68 of 141)
  • Total -- 55% (99 of 181)

Won the game when breaking:
  • Shane -- 63% (25 of 40)
  • Other 11 players -- 42% (59 of 141)
  • Total -- 46% (84 of 181)

Break-and-run games:
  • Shane -- 35% (14 of 40)
  • Other 11 players -- 13% (19 of 141)
  • Total -- 18% (33 of 181)

Is it any wonder Shane won the tournament?

This is even more interesting than the overall stats! I saw a few of the SVB matches and he seemed to be steamrolling everyone. These stats point out his domination of the event. He looked like a man among boys in his matches.
 
I wonder how the tournaments would go if they played 10ball, racked by a referee and the players would not be allowed to look at the rack.
 
The 11 matches covered in post #1 involved 12 different players. Here's how Shane Van Boening did compared to the other 11 players combined.

Made at least one ball on the break and did not foul:
  • Shane -- 78% (31 of 40)
  • Other 11 players -- 48% (68 of 141)
  • Total -- 55% (99 of 181)

Won the game when breaking:
  • Shane -- 63% (25 of 40)
  • Other 11 players -- 42% (59 of 141)
  • Total -- 46% (84 of 181)

Break-and-run games:
  • Shane -- 35% (14 of 40)
  • Other 11 players -- 13% (19 of 141)
  • Total -- 18% (33 of 181)

Is it any wonder Shane won the tournament?
since you're doing break stats, here's one you missed>


Broke at least one jump cue going berzerk:
Shaw -- 100% (1 of 1)
Other 11 players -- 0%
 
Interesting stats. Thanks.

Anyone know where the full results for the tourney can be found?
 
The 11 matches covered in post #1 involved 12 different players. Here's how Shane Van Boening did compared to the other 11 players combined.

Made at least one ball on the break and did not foul:
  • Shane -- 78% (31 of 40)
  • Other 11 players -- 48% (68 of 141)
  • Total -- 55% (99 of 181)

Won the game when breaking:
  • Shane -- 63% (25 of 40)
  • Other 11 players -- 42% (59 of 141)
  • Total -- 46% (84 of 181)

Break-and-run games:
  • Shane -- 35% (14 of 40)
  • Other 11 players -- 13% (19 of 141)
  • Total -- 18% (33 of 181)

Is it any wonder Shane won the tournament?

This is really fascinating. Thanks for posting the stats and especially this Shane comparison.
 
The 11 matches covered in post #1 involved 12 different players. Here's how Shane Van Boening did compared to the other 11 players combined.

Made at least one ball on the break and did not foul:
  • Shane -- 78% (31 of 40)
  • Other 11 players -- 48% (68 of 141)
  • Total -- 55% (99 of 181)

Won the game when breaking:
  • Shane -- 63% (25 of 40)
  • Other 11 players -- 42% (59 of 141)
  • Total -- 46% (84 of 181)

Break-and-run games:
  • Shane -- 35% (14 of 40)
  • Other 11 players -- 13% (19 of 141)
  • Total -- 18% (33 of 181)

Is it any wonder Shane won the tournament?

So... Shane, by himself, accounted for 42% of all break-and-runs (14 out of 33) during streamed matches?!

That's insane!

Numbers like this remind me of when Tiger Woods slipped into "the zone" around 1999-2000 and was lapping fields at will. Very impressive stuff.


...and thank you for the stats!
 
Thanks for the stats..

No real surprise to me .. SvB breaks far and away better than other players. I guess I should say 10ball as I have not seen him break the other games as much.

Over the last couple years I have wondered why we had not heard of other players spending much more time trying to perfect the break.
 
So... Shane, by himself, accounted for 42% of all break-and-runs (14 out of 33) during streamed matches?!

That's insane!

Numbers like this remind me of when Tiger Woods slipped into "the zone" around 1999-2000 and was lapping fields at will. Very impressive stuff.


...and thank you for the stats!

Way to pick up on that stat Mikey. When Earl closed the gap to 12 - 11 last night I said "The cat is done playing with the mouse". Maybe Shane was off the pedal a tad, maybe he wasn't. As Earl was playing really strong. Hats off to Earl, he played strong this tourney.

But that 42% stat you picked is definitely inshane!
 
Back
Top