uh, nothing unless they have some kind of agreement. and if filler put nothing up why should he get something back.
if he didnt buy any of himself in the side action of the calcutta he wasnt part of the payout.
but how could the best player not buy any of himself in the calcutta.
if you make a big win on a superbowl bet how much should you send to the players?
I'd guess something in the 20,000 - 25,000 range would be typical jelly on a 150,000 score.Okay Filler won $40k in the Tourney and $100k in the Auction. Filler cost $41k in the Calcutta. Pretty safe to say he didn't buy any of himself in the auction. I would guess he paid his $2k entry.
So based on the assumptions and the numbers what should the buyer give Filler of the $150k Calcutta money? I have an opinion but just curious what others say.
Correct, the person charge of a gaming table is in fact called a Croupier. But for fun we call the Croupier at the craps table a Crapper.if you win a lot at the black jack table or the craps table
do you tip the dealer /croupier(is that what the craps guy is called?)
Technically it's a $109k score after clawing back the $41k entry.I'd guess something in the 20,000 - 25,000 range would be typical jelly on a 150,000 score.
The "Duration" times that DigitalPool shows for matches have never been accurate match lengths (from lag to final ball). The reason you mention above may well be part of the reason, but I don't think it is the only thing.Yeah, that's why I think the two matches that the bracket shows ended both at exactly 7:12 am are suspect.
Players sometimes forget to put in the last game on their phone/tablet, even if they are keeping score themselves, and just walk away. Then when the TD updates the bracket, he puts the last game in. The match time will reflect the time the TD did it.
casino employees, i dont generally as they are paid employees doing their job and have no influence on your results. people tip them from peer pressure or ignorance. that's money they should be keeping and investing for their future and family.
now if one came and told me they were dealing far down the deck or he was, then he deserved something from the winnings for helping influence the out come. but most times asked if he wanted to take a piece of the action with part of the risk.
most often they split that tip with all the dealers on that whole shift. so you are just tipping the crowd. he might get a penny of every dollar you give him.
i tip big to a waitress usually as i get individual attention. if i just get served like from a robot i adjust.
to each his own.
but saving face or conforming to the norm or appeasing the masses is ingrained in most people and cant see thru it.
Hear, hear!Strongly agreed. Despite the passionate efforts of both Matchroom and many AZB posters to defame him, he is as honest as the day is long.
I think Joe Long the lawyer staked him, backed him, bought him in the auction/Calcutta, and paid his entry fee and expenses. I could be wrong, but if I was a betting person, that's where my money would go.Okay Filler won $40k in the Tourney and $100k in the Auction. Filler cost $41k in the Calcutta. Pretty safe to say he didn't buy any of himself in the auction. I would guess he paid his $2k entry.
So based on the assumptions and the numbers what should the buyer give Filler of the $150k Calcutta money? I have an opinion but just curious what others say.
You’re right. Heard the same thing. Joe put up all the money. Took off all the expenses. Filler got 40% of the net.I think Joe Long the lawyer staked him, backed him, bought him in the auction/Calcutta, and paid his entry fee and expenses. I could be wrong, but if I was a betting person, that's where my money would go.![]()