ok, last night at the poolhall we all had to hear an argument over a game (the argument drug on for quite a while). Folks in the room were split on what the ruling should be, so I thought I'd post on here to see what the majority says....
Player D is giving player S the call 8 playing 9 ball. Player D leaves player S a jump shot on the 8 (cue was behind the 9 - the only two balls left on the table). S jumps the 9 ball and banks the 8 into the side pocket. It is unclear if he called a pocket at all, but he certainly didn't call the side pocket (it was slopped in). Does player S continue shooting (the 9 ball) or not?
S contends that the call part of the spot is for the win only, and if the 8 ball falls when shooting it, (in an uncalled pocket), he keeps shooting. D says, NO WAY. If the called 8 ball falls in a pocket not called it is immediately his turn at the table.
I had to hear this argument, rather loudly, for about an hour last night....but, being the glutton for punishment that I am, let's hear some more.
Player D is giving player S the call 8 playing 9 ball. Player D leaves player S a jump shot on the 8 (cue was behind the 9 - the only two balls left on the table). S jumps the 9 ball and banks the 8 into the side pocket. It is unclear if he called a pocket at all, but he certainly didn't call the side pocket (it was slopped in). Does player S continue shooting (the 9 ball) or not?
S contends that the call part of the spot is for the win only, and if the 8 ball falls when shooting it, (in an uncalled pocket), he keeps shooting. D says, NO WAY. If the called 8 ball falls in a pocket not called it is immediately his turn at the table.
I had to hear this argument, rather loudly, for about an hour last night....but, being the glutton for punishment that I am, let's hear some more.

Last edited: