wayne said:Just make it a requirement that they have to play without talking or they lose, they will never win a game.
Wayne
iconcue said:i'm calling timber out!
and i'm raising the bet to fifty one bucks!!!
and after i take care of timber - eydie! your next!
onepocketchump said:I think I can beat any player on this board at least one set. It is worth $50 for me to try. Any of y'all can try me a race to nine for $50. Putnam, Archer, Bryant, Harriman, Rousey, doesn't matter, all y'all got action for $50.)
John
Hey Sam, SAM, Where you at SAM?satman said:Just yell at me.
sixpack said:Based on their posts...
1) Who is the best player on AZB that you think you can beat? Be willing to bet $50 on a race if you meet them face to face.
2) Who is the player you wouldn't want to gamble with?
Since I'm starting, I'll go first -
1) WilleeBetmore - Don't know for sure, but it'd be worth it if I lost $50 to play in that pool room of his in Indy and get in some good 14.1 in the process.
RC
Eydie Romano said:I love being called out, only one big problem. I don't play. Bob is the title holder in my house.
I would love to watch you play him!![]()
Williebetmore said:Half-a-dozenpops,
Well, assuming you won't scare my wife, spit on the floor, or steal any of my chalk; you have an open invitation if you are in Indy. I was going to play Efren for $100, so you for $50 sounds okay ( I play for free also ).
In response to your 2 questions:
#1. If the game is 9-ball, then there is NO ONE I wouldn't try for $50 in short races. I've beaten a number of professional players at 9-ball (even though they are MUCH better than I - its a stupid game to differentiate players with; but fun to play and watch - the weaker player always has a chance). If the game is straight pool, then I have NEVER beaten anyone better than myself without a significant handicap.
I disagree with Snapshot's position of not gambling with anyone he hasn't seen play. Even if you see them they might be sandbagging. Step up to the plate if its for small stakes. I find that the top players will usually adjust the spot if they truly love to play and compete; and if they see you are willing to step up to the plate. Some of my best matches have been against totally unfamiliar players (I will insist however, that they be nice guys - I don't care to waste time playing unpleasant opponents).
#2 - See my response to #1.
P.S. - I know that I'm evading the issue; but geez, a bunch of us will be at DCC this year, maybe we'll get to see some AZB match-ups; then we won't have to speculate (of course there are guys like OHB and Satman that are just licking their chops at the thought).
Waiting for the DCC bank event to start. You should come up for it. It is a great tournament. SamRude Dog said:Hey Sam, SAM, Where you at SAM?
Snapshot9 said:Wille ... I guess I have to retract a little. I will play almost anyone
a $50 set, although I am not a nit, and when I play I mean to play
a little, and not 1 set out. Yes, I know, quite a bit actually, about
how they can be sandbagging, but I usually stay more in the background
analyzing and evaluating before they even know I am there. I just like
to think that I am a little wiser than I used to be when I was younger
and would match up cold lots of times, especially playing $300 and up
sets. And one of the main reasons today is money, I don't have the
extra cash like I used to have when I was working all the time.
Road players don't come through here like they used to back in the old
days when Burke's Steak house was going with Papa Burke running things,
and I know how all the local players play.
Williebetmore said:Snapshot,
Correction; I should have phrased it differently - I meant only that my practice is not to watch first (not to imply that your practice is incorrect) - my apologies. I only meant to say that I don't have the time to hang out and watch anyone - I just want to play.
If you haven't read "Rags to Rifleman", you will REALLY enjoy the stories of Burkes Steakhouse - Buddy Hall had some great tales to tell.