You said but when I do. So are you saying that you are committed to telling us who it is no matter what at some point shortly regardless of what ultimately happens? Because that is what your wording certainly implies.
Or is what you really mean is that you are just using us to try to get what you want, and if it works and you get what you want then tough luck for us we are on our own and you aren't telling, but if it doesn't work and get you what you want then you will go ahead and give names at that point, not out of desire to help the forum members in return, but only because then you will be seeking to harm the cue maker out of spite?
Obviously not because here you are bringing it up. Why is that?
That aside, it isn't like you are sharing personal information like that he has been cheating on his wife of something. People should be reporting about how businessmen with public businesses conduct said business, good or bad, as long as it is the truth.
Not really. But what it makes more clear is that you are in fact one of those people that wants to use us to try to get something you want, but in return don't want to help us to avoid being in the same position of dealing with someone that could be a problem when you are in the position to easily do that. I totally get the temptation to do that, I really do, but it still has a sh!tty component to it, let's just be honest.
