It would need to be per rack. I think it's worth trying.
The vast majority of the time it wouldn't be needed but really slow players can ruin the enjoyment of the game both for their opponents and the spectators.
Are we including the time walking from the clock to the table? That could add a second or two to the inning. Are we talking over all length of game or Inning per shot? 5 minutes for amateur might be fine, way too long for pros.
The only game that comes to mind is one pocket the chess of pool.
Way too many questions here
Chess clock could work for pool. My idea is start everyone off with 2 minutes, and every shot adds 30 seconds. Whatever you don't use is added back to the clock.
It can be programmed as an app.I get this. The player that runs out of his 2 minutes because he consistently is slower than normal would lose that rack by default
more especially if it were a longer race but I'd like to see this done. Is there a function to allow it to add 30 seconds each time?
In my experience a chess clock is much, much better than the standard pool shot clock with a fixed time.45second shot clock with NO extension is all the game needs. i'm talking rotation/14.1 here. one-pocket is a different story imo.
You can set a delay (much as you like) before it starts the players clock(time bank)Are we including the time walking from the clock to the table? That could add a second or two to the inning. Are we talking over all length of game or Inning per shot? 5 minutes for amateur might be fine, way too long for pros.
The only game that comes to mind is one pocket the chess of pool.
Way too many questions here
you're probably right. never seen it used in pool. don't play chess. too dumb/impatient.In my experience a chess clock is much, much better than the standard pool shot clock with a fixed time.
There's a shockeryou're probably right. never seen it used in pool. don't play chess. too dumb/impatient.more of a horseshoe/lawn-dart kinda guy.
![]()
Bob, I like the shot clock….accumulated time can be unfair….tight tables, humid conditions, sometimes a safety battle can slow things down by creating more turns at the table rather than more time over the ball. I’ve seen 15 minute 9-ball games that were exciting, with great traps and great escapes.In my experience a chess clock is much, much better than the standard pool shot clock with a fixed time.
Modern chess clocks can include an added time per inning, such as 20 seconds. That can allow for extended safety battles but you have to keep things moving.... sometimes a safety battle can slow things down by creating more turns at the table rather than more time over the ball. I’ve seen 15 minute 9-ball games that were exciting, with great traps and great escapes.
....
Sure it could. It would give you more time on a difficult shot that requires more time to think about it when you can fire in easy shots in 10 seconds or less. If you're playing a five or seven minute game, you can bank a couple of minutes for those difficult shots.Here is the wikipedia post on Chess Clocks. I think it could work but today games are already 30 sec shot clock.
I'm not sure if the chess clock can improve on that.
![]()
Chess clock - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org