mantis99 said:With all the recalls with chinese made toys, does anyone worry about lead paint in the imported pool cues?
StevenPWaldon said:If there's any sort of a finish over *anything* with lead paint, you're fine. Mostly.
A common misconception is that developmental disorders and health problems that occur due to lead-based paint arise from eating the paint chips. Really, most of the problems with lead paint is from ingestion of dust from lead paint when it starts to deteriorate over time. It's not that kids have an affinity for eating paint chips. They touch things (in the case of houses with lead paint, walls that are deteriorating) and then stick hands and everything else in their mouth.
Anyway: if the cue has a finish over it (assuming it even has lead paint) then all is fine for pool and health purposes. This is a pool cue, not a house. No dust or "chips" will ever be exposed to air and won't be ingested/inhaled/whatever.
An albeit short-term solution, even houses with lead-based paints can be painted over with non lead-based paints to be innocuous.
Cues shouldn't be a worry. They have a finish on them. And even if they didn't, only a small proportion of lead can be absorbed through the skin compared through ingestion. Like Jude said, worry about the chalk.
txplshrk said:"Master green chalk, made in Chicago, tested as high as 8,000 parts per million of lead, and Pioneer green chalk, made in Taipei, Taiwan, exceeded 7,000 ppm. By comparison, lead-based paint, which was discontinued for use in housing in 1978, has a standard lead content of 5,000 ppm."
Other brands tested in the Samaritan study were found to contain either no lead or very insignificant traces of lead. Those include Imperial and National Tournament brands of green chalk, Superior, Triangle and National Tournament brands of orange chalk and all brands of blue chalk tested.
That comes from this website:
http://wc.arizona.edu/~wildcat/papers/old-wildcats/spring95/February/February27,1995/01_3_m.html
This is why the founder of Silvercup made chalk without lead in it. It was essentially the same basic compounds and pigment as Masters minus the lead!
That's tuff one though, a lot of people around here shoot with their tongue.jay helfert said:Just don't chalk your tongue and you'll be all right.
I always carry my chalk in my pocket, Is that why my Viagra doesn't work?txplshrk said:"Master green chalk, made in Chicago, tested as high as 8,000 parts per million of lead, and Pioneer green chalk, made in Taipei, Taiwan, exceeded 7,000 ppm. By comparison, lead-based paint, which was discontinued for use in housing in 1978, has a standard lead content of 5,000 ppm."
Other brands tested in the Samaritan study were found to contain either no lead or very insignificant traces of lead. Those include Imperial and National Tournament brands of green chalk, Superior, Triangle and National Tournament brands of orange chalk and all brands of blue chalk tested.
That comes from this website:
http://wc.arizona.edu/~wildcat/papers/old-wildcats/spring95/February/February27,1995/01_3_m.html
This is why the founder of Silvercup made chalk without lead in it. It was essentially the same basic compounds and pigment as Masters minus the lead!
txplshrk said:"Master green chalk, made in Chicago, tested as high as 8,000 parts per million of lead, and Pioneer green chalk, made in Taipei, Taiwan, exceeded 7,000 ppm. By comparison, lead-based paint, which was discontinued for use in housing in 1978, has a standard lead content of 5,000 ppm."
Other brands tested in the Samaritan study were found to contain either no lead or very insignificant traces of lead. Those include Imperial and National Tournament brands of green chalk, Superior, Triangle and National Tournament brands of orange chalk and all brands of blue chalk tested.
That comes from this website:
http://wc.arizona.edu/~wildcat/papers/old-wildcats/spring95/February/February27,1995/01_3_m.html
This is why the founder of Silvercup made chalk without lead in it. It was essentially the same basic compounds and pigment as Masters minus the lead!
Jack Flanagan said:anybody notice this study is 12 years old ?? I'm 58 years old and haven't suffered any ill effects.Tweeten says they have no lead,,,let's see a study made in this century (e.g. current)....
can't wait til somebody ties this in to Iraq or global warming...![]()
When this surfaced over ten years ago, we sent our products to the testing facility to have it tested. The results were that our products contained less lead then a glass of tap water. We have no idea where they got the "chalk" that they originally tested that showed high levels, but we felt at the time they must have tested some counterfeit product from China, since the other brand that they mentioned from China also contained high amounts.
Pigment is the only possible source of lead and at the time we started using pigments that do not contain any toxic or harmful substances, including lead.
As for the contents of our chalk, without giving away trade secrets.....our chalk is primarily sand. There is nothing in any of our brands of chalk or colors that contains anything harmful or toxic.
I hope this answers your questions.
Cheers,
Tweeten