CTE and a 2x1 Surface Explored

cookie man said:
We don't use CTC with CTE. First you ask to fudge the table, then you want to fudge the system. Wait i'll try the shots with a baseball bat and a hockey puck, would that make you happy,lol.

Seriously whether you guys believe it or not, CTE connects to the pockets exactly as Stan says. You and your friends expert minds haven't proven anything different. Lots of keyboard thoughts don't change that. You haven't even posted a keyboard drawing that would invalidate Stan's claim.
And all this garbage about changing the size of the table makes Stan's claim more and more valid. It shows that you have ZERO evidence to dispute it.
Click to expand...
Forgive me the occasional typo. Obviously I meant ETC not CTC. The point is that with 6 inches cut off the bottom the corner pocket is now 2.5 diamonds from the yellow ball and 1.5 diamonds from the red ball. Why is there no solution for this shot?
 
Dan White said:
Forgive me the occasional typo. Obviously I meant ETC not CTC. The point is that with 6 inches cut off the bottom the corner pocket is now 2.5 diamonds from the yellow ball and 1.5 diamonds from the red ball. Why is there no solution for this shot?
Click to expand...
CTE would work for one side or the other, not both. The system works in it's entirety on a 2x1 surface, period.
 
Dan White said:
For me it didn't take hours. I knew after 10 minutes with Hal that you had to vary the pivot to make shots go in.
Click to expand...
It doesn't even take a second. It's obvious without knowing anything about it that it's the only way possible. Why? Because no system can precisely define all (or even a respectable fraction of) the alignments needed in pool - it always takes some experience-based estimation to finish the alignment. In fact, that's the crucial part of every aiming task using every method.

The main problem discussing CTE with its users is that none of them can see that obvious fact, and they think they're being attacked when it's pointed out. Hopefully some of the non-users reading here get it - if they don't, then CTE might be for them.

pj
chgo
 
Patrick Johnson said:
It doesn't even take a second. It's obvious without knowing anything about it that it's the only way possible. Why? Because no system can precisely define all (or even a respectable fraction of) the alignments needed in pool - it always takes some experience-based estimation to finish the alignment. In fact, that's the crucial part of every aiming task using every method.

The main problem discussing CTE with its users is that none of them can see that obvious fact, and they think they're being attacked when it's pointed out. Hopefully some of the non-users reading here get it - if they don't, then CTE might be for them.

pj
chgo
Click to expand...
I gotta say, after reading this post a few times along with that other guys post about chopping sides off the pool table to test out a system i had to walk outside. Yes indeed, a full moon. Should have known. The crazies are out in full force,lol.
 
Patrick Johnson said:
It doesn't even take a second. It's obvious without knowing anything about it that it's the only way possible. Why? Because no system can precisely define all (or even a respectable fraction of) the alignments needed in pool - it always takes some experience-based estimation to finish the alignment. In fact, that's the crucial part of every aiming task using every method.

The main problem discussing CTE with its users is that none of them can see that obvious fact, and they think they're being attacked when it's pointed out. Hopefully some of the non-users reading here get it - if they don't, then CTE might be for them.

pj
chgo
Click to expand...
The idea seems to be to sell around this trivial detail. Ironically if you cut to a world where cortical cybernatics define the species, CTE can have relevance as a preparatory step.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top