A half ball HIT is always a half ball HIT.
If you want to start a pre shot routine with a center to edge reference, that is not a HIT.
CTE Stepping Cue Ball.
- Thread starter tonythetiger583
- Start date
If you want to start a pre shot routine with a center to edge reference, that is not a HIT.
Dang PJ, I know, for sure, you can comprehend writing better than that. Who said anything, at all, about applying, anything? There is no side anything,,,,,,,,, get the shot in your vision correctly and aim at the center of the white ball, (that is the cue ball).
They have and they still should be. But posters like you have made sure that will not happen. Your constant bitching about CTE even though you’ve never learned it or been interested in it has totally ruined the aiming forum. Pat yourself on the back.
lol
The Aiming forum was created to quarantine CTE because of this constant dynamic:
Non-CTE user: Can you explain how that instruction makes sense?
CTE Defender:
Last edited:
It's beyond me how that actor got through that without busting out laughing. I wonder how many takes it required.
Nah. It was created because internet trolls couldn’t leave CTE alone. You are a prime example. 20 plus years posting against and you’ve never bothered to learn how to actually use it. Never bothered to experiment on the table to see if it would be good for your game or not. Just years and years of troll comments.
There's your problem. You are gullible. You shouldn't take my word for anything any more than you should take the word of some guy who spent a career teaching little kids how to read -- a noble pursuit to be sure, but not exactly physics. Look at the science and discuss the claims made, which is what I have always tried to do.
OK, shoot. Several of us have advanced math backgrounds.
Wait... was that the explanation? I asked you earlier to tell your best joke because you said you were a funny guy. Is this the joke?
yo would be a lot more more credible after all these years if you would once and for all prove why CTE does not work, instead of all the stupid little 1 liners you and pj come up with.
And the joke, whatever I posted I was pretty sure you wouldn't get it. I was right.
You never replied to that joke post, or at least I didn't see it.
You don't understand the argument. I was never about proving that CTE doesn't work. Clearly, some people play better after adopting CTE so as far as they are concerned it works. My interest was in examining the claims Stan makes that supposedly prove that it works in the magical way he claims. I'm talking about the "phenomena that was never supposed to be" or the ability to use the same perception and pocket shots at different angles. When people point out that this is not supported by geometry, the counter argument is that it can't be shown in a book. It's a 3D creation of the mind, or whatever. The point is that when CTE supporters have already swallowed whole, nothing seems to be able to shake their faith.
So what to do? I tried to use Stan's own videos wherever I could to illustrate inaccuracies and flawed logic. I believe I have done that on more than one occasion but, again, it seems once you've signed on to CTE all logic goes out the window. I think it is still an interesting topic and it is good for newbies looking into CTE to see both sides of the story.
But using your idea of proving it doesn't work, what do you do when you prove that 2+2 does not equal 5 yet you still get people saying it does?
I'm all ears waiting for you to provide mathematical proof for CTE like Brian did for Poolology. I always said I'd be a bigger cheerleader than JB if someone could do something as presumptuous as actually provide hard evidence for Stan's claims.
nah, I think I've spent more time explaining than I should have, assuming some of you were actually trying to "get" it, but you have no desire to understand, hell I explained it at least 2 times already. All you guys want to do is pick Stan apart,,,,,,,,,, a lowly school teacher as you described him. You guys need a life.
yes and noOf course you realize that includes you, too, right? At least for a few years anyway.
i am a lurker
who butts his nose in from time to time
You're like a walking cliche of the CTE true believer. You've got all the bases covered:
- I could explain it to you if I wanted to,
- It's been explained to you already over and over,
- You have no interest in learning,
- You've never tried to learn it, only to pick it apart,
- It's not worth my time
- Yadda, yadda, yadda, bullshit.
I never said being a teacher was lowly. I went out of my way to say otherwise, but apparently you don't understand that comment any better than the transmission thing. Stan has no business telling professional scientists and engineers that they don't understand his brand of science.
We're still waiting for you to show us the CTE math. Your "5 axis" bullcrap spin didn't work. Try again.
oh it works perfectly, but you don't deserve it, not worth my time
Or Stan could have saved 38 chapters and like 900 pages and just said "it works perfectly."
And you're obsession with Stan continues. Stan has had professional scientists and engineers to his house. They all have agreed that CTE works exactly how Stan describes it. They all had success using CTE. Could they do the math on it, no. But then again CTE is a visual system and the math most likely will never be done for it. That's been long established. There has been no hiding about that. Full disclosure has been out there.
Now instead of your constant wrong accusations why not get out of your mom's basement, go to a pool hall and actually try and learn CTE so maybe at some point this year you will actually make a useful post concerning CTE.
Or you could get help with your obsession.
Is this a discussion forum or a personal vendetta forum