I'm greatly enjoying the recent posts by Grady, Freddy and Jay Helfert about the great players of the 60's and 70's, but I'm a little confused about how good all these players were in relation to each other.
For example: Take these players: Denny Searcy, Cole Dickson, Harold Worst, Greg Stevens, Ritchie Florence. In the recent posts they've all been said to be "unbeatable", "no one wanted any part of them" etc. but the thing is they couldn't all be the best. Did Worst fear Searcy? Would Cole pay Florence? You see what I mean? The same can be said of the earlier generation: Lassiter, Rags, Willis...did they fear each other?
Personally the best 9-ball I've ever seen played was by Buddy Hall in the 80's, I can't imagine anyone playing much better than he did then. I hear he was even better in the late 70's but I can't vouch for that.
.
For example: Take these players: Denny Searcy, Cole Dickson, Harold Worst, Greg Stevens, Ritchie Florence. In the recent posts they've all been said to be "unbeatable", "no one wanted any part of them" etc. but the thing is they couldn't all be the best. Did Worst fear Searcy? Would Cole pay Florence? You see what I mean? The same can be said of the earlier generation: Lassiter, Rags, Willis...did they fear each other?
Personally the best 9-ball I've ever seen played was by Buddy Hall in the 80's, I can't imagine anyone playing much better than he did then. I hear he was even better in the late 70's but I can't vouch for that.
.