Diamond pockets specs

We are all delusional here. 4.5" is tight for ANY player, outside of the top 50 in the world. Especially on a Diamond that has a shelf a mile deep. How many players can beat the ghost on a 9' GC with factory 5" pockets? Maybe 1 out of 100 SERIOUS players?

Smaller pockets are just for bragging rights. The players that insist on them for the most part can't even run a single rack. Its mind boggling to me how the trend has gotten so tight.
I must be a better player than I give myself credit for. I have no problem beating the ghost on my table. 🤷🏻‍♂️
 
One of our local bars got rid of his valley for a diamond with 4.25. He now charges a $1 a game instead of 50 cents and he’s not making anymore Money with It . It takes twice as long to play a game for the local bar patrons lol

I don’t think 4.25 are tight for good players. I’d have a 4 inch table or 2 for the real serious players. My friend who plays in matchroom events has 4 inch and I consider myself a very good amateur and it’s to tight for me. It’s just not fun.
I have played on both 4.18 / 4.25 and as an amateur player as well, I think the most I can do with would be 4.25" . This sizes is the best overall mediums for everything. The 4.18" is very very frustrating as even the slightest dirtier ball sets vs a newly polished one would drive me crazy playing on it.
 
What's your skill, seriously? Are you the favorite to beat the 9 ball ghost day in and day out (on a 9' GC 5" pocket).
I don't know.
I don't play 9 ball.
I don't play the ghost.
I don't play on 9' GCs with 5" pockets.

What I do know is playing 10 ball I have run out on 9' Diamonds with pro cut pockets enough to make the statement regarding no joy for GCs w/ buckets.

As said, this is my opinion. We have all heard yours.
 
What's your skill, seriously? Are you the favorite to beat the 9 ball ghost day in and day out (on a 9' GC 5" pocket).
WTF do people keep using 'playing the ghost' as a factor in pocket sizing??? Playing the ghost is tough action on just about any pocket unless you're 600ish FR or better. I've played quite a bit on blue label ProAms and Pros. Tough but fair. Anything smaller is for better players up to pros imo. League cut Diamonds are great for league play(DUH) and general banger play.
 
I have played on both 4.18 / 4.25 and as an amateur player as well, I think the most I can do with would be 4.25" . This sizes is the best overall mediums for everything. The 4.18" is very very frustrating as even the slightest dirtier ball sets vs a newly polished one would drive me crazy playing on it.
4.25 is way to tight for general poolroom use. Most casual/rec players have trouble on 5" pockets. 4.5" is a doable all-round size but still tough for bangers.
 
WTF do people keep using 'playing the ghost' as a factor in pocket sizing??? Playing the ghost is tough action on just about any pocket unless you're 600ish FR or better. I've played quite a bit on blue label ProAms and Pros. Tough but fair. Anything smaller is for better players up to pros imo. League cut Diamonds are great for league play(DUH) and general banger play.
Because the guy is talking like he has no issues playing the ghost, it's a tough accomplishment to do it regularly.
 
WTF do people keep using 'playing the ghost' as a factor in pocket sizing??? Playing the ghost is tough action on just about any pocket unless you're 600ish FR or better. I've played quite a bit on blue label ProAms and Pros. Tough but fair. Anything smaller is for better players up to pros imo. League cut Diamonds are great for league play(DUH) and general banger play.
Well he said he'd rather wait on a waiting list than play on a table with bigger pockets. For someone to say that I imagine they would absolutely murder an easier table. That's why I was curious the skill level.

I played 2 sets to 10 tonight. We started on a 7' Diamond with Pro-Cut pockets as the 9' were all booked. Opponent is 592, I'm 571. I was up 6-1 in about 25 minutes, playing jam up. A 9' Diamond with Pro-Cut pockets opened up and we moved there mid set. The first game must have taken 15 minutes we both kept missing. And the rest of the set went slow as molasses too. Same with the next race to 10 that was all on the 9'.

Anyone can of course play on any table. I don't mean to say my opinion means more than anyone else.

A 9' Diamond with pro-cut pockets, and typical worn-cloth local conditions, is such a tough table, no one is running racks on it unless they are near pro level.

I actually wish the 9' Pro-Cut pockets had the same shelf as the 7' Pro-Cut pockets. It would play a lot easier then. The 7' Pro-Cut pockets play just right, for serious local players, IMO.
 
Because the guy is talking like he has no issues playing the ghost, it's a tough accomplishment to do it regularly.
Playing Casper is not a very accurate way to judge your skill imo. Depends way too much on the the break. In most cases if you don't open up the rack you're not getting out regardless of how good you play.
 
Well he said he'd rather wait on a waiting list than play on a table with bigger pockets. For someone to say that I imagine they would absolutely murder an easier table. That's why I was curious the skill level.

I played 2 sets to 10 tonight. We started on a 7' Diamond with Pro-Cut pockets as the 9' were all booked. Opponent is 592, I'm 571. I was up 6-1 in about 25 minutes, playing jam up. A 9' Diamond with Pro-Cut pockets opened up and we moved there mid set. The first game must have taken 15 minutes we both kept missing. And the rest of the set went slow as molasses too. Same with the next race to 10 that was all on the 9'.

Anyone can of course play on any table. I don't mean to say my opinion means more than anyone else.

A 9' Diamond with pro-cut pockets, and typical worn-cloth local conditions, is such a tough table, no one is running racks on it unless they are near pro level.

I actually wish the 9' Pro-Cut pockets had the same shelf as the 7' Pro-Cut pockets. It would play a lot easier then. The 7' Pro-Cut pockets play just right, for serious local players, IMO.
Most racks of 9b i ever did was a 5pk on my 21st birthday. It was on a bucket-mouth GC1 at CueCity in Tulsa. The only reason i did it was i broke like king-kong and just happened to get an open shot each time. Only one of the racks was hard at all. My point is the break is the determining factor for package-runnage regardless of table or its pockets. At Magoo's we have an old D'mond ProAm red-label with pretty worn 860. Its not that much harder to adjust to/play on than the 4.5" GC4 sitting ten ft. away. Nothing like what the He-ManDiamondHatersClub continually whines about.
 
Last edited:
Local GC covered with 760+ speed off-brand cloth played very well, initially. Now, after slightly worn, a ball hit with any speed that touches the long rail on the way into the corner will always bobble. Don’t know why, since that didn’t happen (as I recall) ‘back in the day’ (?).
BTW: All this whining re: tight pockets reminds me of the golf ring game I used to regularly attend back in the 90s (10’ snooker table using standard pool balls). Masochism exemplified.
 
Local GC covered with 760+ speed off-brand cloth played very well, initially. Now, after slightly worn, a ball hit with any speed that touches the long rail on the way into the corner will always bobble. Don’t know why, since that didn’t happen (as I recall) ‘back in the day’ (?).
BTW: All this whining re: tight pockets reminds me of the golf ring game I used to regularly attend back in the 90s (10’ snooker table using standard pool balls). Masochism exemplified.
It is common knowledge new cloth is slippery and gets less so as it wears.

Things go into holes better the more slippery there is. Shirley also common.
 
Local GC covered with 760+ speed off-brand cloth played very well, initially. Now, after slightly worn, a ball hit with any speed that touches the long rail on the way into the corner will always bobble. Don’t know why, since that didn’t happen (as I recall) ‘back in the day’ (?).
BTW: All this whining re: tight pockets reminds me of the golf ring game I used to regularly attend back in the 90s (10’ snooker table using standard pool balls). Masochism exemplified.
My first trip to OKC back in the early 80's a guy ran out the golf game on a 10' snooker table with standard balls. That was the least expensive golf game I ever played, there were no hickies:ROFLMAO:
 
My first trip to OKC back in the early 80's a guy ran out the golf game on a 10' snooker table with standard balls. That was the least expensive golf game I ever played, there were no hickies:ROFLMAO:
The current golf table at Magoo's used to be in Chester's in OkC. Its an old 10' B'wick Royale with pool cushions and TINY pockets. Cloth is Gorina 3c cloth. Pretty tough. Normal game is 5/6 handed, $10/game, $1/hickies. Sometimes they play 20/2 or if a few top guys are there i've seen them play 50/5. Always with pool balls.
 
We are all delusional here. 4.5" is tight for ANY player, outside of the top 50 in the world. Especially on a Diamond that has a shelf a mile deep. How many players can beat the ghost on a 9' GC with factory 5" pockets? Maybe 1 out of 100 SERIOUS players?

Smaller pockets are just for bragging rights. The players that insist on them for the most part can't even run a single rack. Its mind boggling to me how the trend has gotten so tight.
Well said. Exactly how I feel.
 
Back
Top