Digicue Blue. Guys are Afraid to Know?

I'm not usually a fan of gizmos such as this. But here I think you yourself need to clarify what would constitute proof, to you?

High runs etc are contigent on many factors, such as mental acuity, vision, aiming, understanding of the game (pattern play, risk management) as well as the stroke. Also we all have cyclic performance swings to varying degrees, caused by numerous physiological and psychological factors. It would be pretty hard to isolate not only the effect of (possible improvement of) the stroke from those other factors, but also any kind of placebo or nocebo effect the device might introduce.

Personally I think a valid test would be a battery of shots with position as well as pocketing requirements. Like shot number one from Bert Kinisters first tape and other such stroke tests. Admittedly it would be difficult to get it to scientific level, if not impossible, but you'd get a good enough idea, I'd think. A number of trials over a period of time would be needed, with no specific practise of the test battery inbetween.

I believe in coaching and self analysis (video assisted) myself, but the above is how I'd test it.

That’s all good by me.

But so far none of that has been proffered.

Lou Figueroa
 
If you think I've made an assumption that's unwarranted, let me know. Isn't that kind of the point of these discussions?

Also, I never claimed that anybody's play was improved. Read my post again.

Well, you’ve used the word a couple of times already…

Lou Figueroa
 
If you think I've made an assumption that's unwarranted, let me know. Isn't that kind of the point of these discussions?

Also, I never claimed that anybody's play was improved. Read my post again.

If folks aren’t improving their play the WTF is the point?!

Lou Figueroa
 
If I claimed that a worse stroke would make a person worse at pool, nobody would bat an eyelash, much less demand proof.

Yet we have people on this thread honestly doubting that a better stroke might make a person better at pool.

WTF is going on here.

I don’t know, I was minding my own beeswax and all of a sudden I got sucked back into a five year old thread.

Lou Figueroa
 
If folks aren’t improving their play the WTF is the point?!

Lou Figueroa
You seem to be the only person who doesn't see the intrinsic value of an improved stroke.

Sort of like refusing to acknowledge that gold bars have value.

Baffling.
 
You are making sssumptions.

And where are “many people” reporting they’ve improved their metrics and that that has led to improved play?

Lou Figueroa
Those would be anecdotes, not proof. You'd need properly structured independent studies published in peer reviewed academic journals to have any proof.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: bbb
You seem to be the only person who doesn't see the intrinsic value of an improved stroke.

Sort of like refusing to acknowledge that gold bars have value.

Baffling.

How do you know the result is an improved stroke?

Lou Figueroa
 
Those would be anecdotes, not proof. You'd need properly structured independent studies published in peer reviewed academic journals to have any proof.

I don’t think we need to go that far.

It’d just be nice to see something more solid than anecdotal accounts and assumptions.

Lou Figueroa
 
  • Like
Reactions: bbb
If anyone was really interested the first questions would be where does this thing go and what does it weigh? I knew these things once for an old model but I have slept a bunch of times since then. If the test equipment itself changes your stroke while it is installed that invalidates the testing.

I think a video camera would give more information and most of us have one in our pocket these days.

Hu
 
How do you know the result is an improved stroke?
...
Because many people report that they can see improvement according to the device.

Do you have reason to believe that the device might not accurately measure the quality of a person's stroke?

Like, do you think the accelerometers aren't accurate enough? Or what?
 
Because many people report that they can see improvement according to the device.

Do you have reason to believe that the device might not accurately measure the quality of a person's stroke?

Like, do you think the accelerometers aren't accurate enough? Or what?

Who is these “many” people?

And yes, I do question the device can accurately measure “the quality” of a person’s stroke. What it can measure are particular parameters of motion which do not automatically translate to better performance. Much as with a Coke bottle, all you can achieve is being able to accurately poke through a Coke bottle. It does not mean you have a better stroke nor guarantee you improved performance.

Lou Figueroa
 
Who is these “many” people?
I found a thread from this site after three seconds of googling:


And yes, I do question the device can accurately measure “the quality” of a person’s stroke. ...
Let's posit that the device correctly measures what it claims to measure: straightness, tip steer, follow-through, and "jab."

Are you saying that if a person's stroke is perfectly straight, with no tip steer, good follow through, and no "jabbyness," that that person's stroke might still actually not be very good?

What aspect of stroke quality do you think the device might not measure?

Or do you think the device doesn't accurately measure the things that it claims to measure?
 
I found a thread from this site after three seconds of googling:



Let's posit that the device correctly measures what it claims to measure: straightness, tip steer, follow-through, and "jab."

Are you saying that if a person's stroke is perfectly straight, with no tip steer, good follow through, and no "jabbyness," that that person's stroke might still actually not be very good?

What aspect of stroke quality do you think the device might not measure?

Or do you think the device doesn't accurately measure the things that it claims to measure?

Looking through that thread there appear to be a few guys who felt it helped with little reference to their level of play — so to claim “many” is a bit of a stretch.

Also oh BTW, in that thread were many valid issues with the device and its measurements (just sayin’).

So what I’m saying is that a straight no jab no steer etc stroke, as measured by a device, does not mean you will play better. Just take one look at all the best players out there, now and through the history of the game, and there’s huge variations that allow each individual to be one of those best players, whether it’s a swoop or a steer or a elbow pump or a swipe.

Pool is as much art as it is science. And poking a cue through a Coke bottle is just going to get you good at poking a cue through a Coke bottle. Personally, I’m not swayed by an APA 3 saying they got better because they got good measurements. I mean oh my goodness gracious, virtually anything a lower level player does which gets them practicing is going to mean some kind of improvement or an attempt to limit cognitive dissonance from a new purchase.

Lou Figueroa
with apologies to
Rodgers and Hammerstein
 
Funny... Now you are the inspector Clouseau on everyone that posts on AZB? Hope you do that with the folks that buy $3500 Southwest cue sticks. My damn problem was posting a great training device on AZB trying to help. Should have kept it to myself.
I know that feeling. 👍🏻
 
What do you mean, "currently going down the same road"? Do you think training gadgets are... new?
I was comparing launch monitors and all their 'supposedly' useful data to these pool gizmos and their 'useful' output. Try to keep up.
 
Can the device help to get a stroke straight? I'm sure it can with practice and also watching the feedback of the balls. Only watching the feedback of the balls can also do this, especially when combined with a camera and/or just paying attention to what you are doing. Sometimes having "body awareness" can be a challenge. Some people don't have it but it can be practiced. Some days I don't have it very well, other days I do. The funny part is when I feel like a floating pair of eyeballs with no body awareness, I play my best. When things are perfect in this game I almost forget "I" exist. Flow state? If you've never hit a good stroke, it's hard to have a goal to shoot for... Once I hit it really sweet I chase that feeling on every shot.

I'm sure that there is some usefulness to the Digicue, but like anything it all depends on if you practice well with it and actually incorporate that into your game. It's a tool but obviously not needed to reach high level pool.

Personally I don't need a "tattletale" letting me know when my stroke is bad, I can feel it and it's easily observable based on what the balls do. Of course this is assuming one has consistent enough fundamentals and has played enough to understand what's supposed to happen and how it's supposed to feel. I could see this device being really useful for newer students of the game. The more time you spend getting solid fundamentals at the beginning the better. I know every league night I see many people that could improve their game with something like this, or a coke bottle. When the planets align they shoot great, but there are so many moving parts to their stroke that it's easy for something to go wrong. They've hit/stroked good before, but there are so many moving parts that it's almost up to chance if it happens.
 
Can the device help to get a stroke straight? I'm sure it can with practice and also watching the feedback of the balls. Only watching the feedback of the balls can also do this, especially when combined with a camera and/or just paying attention to what you are doing. Sometimes having "body awareness" can be a challenge. Some people don't have it but it can be practiced. Some days I don't have it very well, other days I do. The funny part is when I feel like a floating pair of eyeballs with no body awareness, I play my best. When things are perfect in this game I almost forget "I" exist. Flow state? If you've never hit a good stroke, it's hard to have a goal to shoot for... Once I hit it really sweet I chase that feeling on every shot.

I'm sure that there is some usefulness to the Digicue, but like anything it all depends on if you practice well with it and actually incorporate that into your game. It's a tool but obviously not needed to reach high level pool.

Personally I don't need a "tattletale" letting me know when my stroke is bad, I can feel it and it's easily observable based on what the balls do. Of course this is assuming one has consistent enough fundamentals and has played enough to understand what's supposed to happen and how it's supposed to feel. I could see this device being really useful for newer students of the game. The more time you spend getting solid fundamentals at the beginning the better. I know every league night I see many people that could improve their game with something like this, or a coke bottle. When the planets align they shoot great, but there are so many moving parts to their stroke that it's easy for something to go wrong. They've hit/stroked good before, but there are so many moving parts that it's almost up to chance if it happens.
I don't have the product, but i would think that if it had a live view and you could see in realtime how much your stroke is out of wack. Red is out of alignment and green is perfectly straight.
 
This stroke device is amazing. But, why won't you guys buy it and see how your stroke holds up? Pool players would rather spend $2,000 on a new cue stick thinking it will help their game but spending $150 on a device that might reveal their stroke problems... no way.
I've fixed the "Tip Steer" with a change in my stance but the "follow through" is a 6.0. I can not get it higher so far. The "follow through" measures acceleration of the cue stick through the cue ball. My teacher pegs it in the 10's every time so I know it's my stroke. My "straightness" will always be red because I use a pendulum stroke. Must be straight through piston to get this higher so I don't care about that parameter.
Come on and get one. Let's see how your stroke stands.
One reason is that there are more cost-effective solutions available. For example, I have a laser pointer that only costs a few dollars. By adding a lens to split the dot into a line, I can project it vertically onto a wall. This allows me to observe if a student's stance or grip adjustments reduce their deviation when attempting straight strokes.
 
Man this is a fun read....

What does a good** stroke have to do with improved play..?

**What is good...?

I would think a good stroke is one that is repeatable. It may be mechanically straight as an arrow, or looping chicken wing. Either one can get the job done. Is a straight stroke easier to reproduce...?..., maybe. Is a loopy stroke more difficult to perform consistently...?..., maybe.

Will a device that tells you that your stroke is not straight do anything to fix your stroke. It could just as easily cause you months of worse play if you choose to make the device happy
 
Last edited:
Back
Top