And many people do see what he sees.
I have a job and a family so it's hard to be a champion at pool.
You brag about your system, what pro tournament have you won?
Discussing CTE with Stan Shuffett
- Thread starter Dan White
- Start date
And many people do see what he sees.
I have a job and a family so it's hard to be a champion at pool.
You brag about your system, what pro tournament have you won?
And most people would rather ***** on AZ than actually work with something new on the pool table.
If THEY are nobodies, especially with Stan's certifications as an instructor from the most prestigious organizations in pool and the length of time he's been doing it...what does that make you?
How about an absolute NOBODY with one of the biggest mouths and egos on the forum who plays in a HANDICAP LEAGUE as YOU receive high spots in order to be able to compete with the other league players or you'd get trounced. Where has ghost ball, the contact patch, or the arrow gotten you?
When I wrote it I was also thinking of you in addition to Duckie. Thanks for popping in and popping off as usual so I could clarify it.
Sorry but your system will always have issues with others. If it really worked as described, there would be no arguing. The truth seems hard to find I guess.
Hal might be someday. Stan might be someday.
Cranfield likely didn't even write the book that has his name on it. Back then publishers would team up with famous players and assign them a ghost writer to actually write the book.
The question really is who are you? Compared to Stan who are you?
On this pool forum you are the lowest ranked member, namely one that cannot play AT ALL. So whatever you have to say about how to play pool carries NO WEIGHT.
Stan, a retiree, finished tied for 17th at the US Open. He has won many events in his life in several disciplines. You can't even win a local handicapped tournament.
Your only platform is to promote a silly aim-trainer that does not even really work that well found in a book from the 60s. You have zero credentials and zero credibility. You have audacity and tenacity for sure but no credibility.
That you have the classlessness to even call Stan's credentials into question using a player from the 60s is not silly but it's also clueless. Pool has evolved a little bit since the 60s.
Really? No arguing from whom?
I find that people argue about everything no matter how clear the facts are.
If you had any proof you could put it on video but you don't.
To do that though would probably require some lying so maybe you don't want to do that.
Huh? NEVAH! LMAO
Not true. A month or so ago I was talking to Nick Varner about this and he said that when he missed in his life it was 99% because he aimed wrong.
So what do you say to a person with a perfect stroke who misses shots? What did they do wrong?
And as for using GB, maybe you do, maybe you can visualize the gb perfectly, some people claim that they can and who am I to say they can't? But not everyone can.
If you can then don't fix what's not broken.
But don't claim that what works for you works for everyone else as well. Choice is good and CTE is one choice that a lot of us find works better than GB. We don't WORRY about visuals either because we learn them and then they become a natural part of our game. It's harder to use my television remote than it is to use CTE.
What is up with the silly red herring arguments?
First aiming systems do not "create" champions. Secondly, if one were going to point to the "creation" of a champion then Landon Shuffett certainly qualifies.
You certainly don't want to tangle with Landon on the pool table. There are very few players breathing who want to play him even. Only really top players have a chance against Landon so maybe he counts.
Aiming systems are simply tools that each champion uses. Shane has one, Darren has one, Johhny says he has one, Phil Burford uses CTE, Shaun Wilkie uses CTE, Stevie Moore uses CTE.
"creating champions"........where does this nonsense come from?
Look at the 5 shots with the same line up. This is just one issue that will always be there. The proof is in Stan's video. Many wont see it the way you guy's do.
If he put it on video it wouldn't be proof. You can't prove such things with a video.
pj <- for the zillionth time
chgo
Really, this whole post is such a joke. CTE only has issues because keyboard commando's try to tear it apart from there computer desk. Notice how the naysayer's haven't bought the dvd or taken a lesson, very telling. The one's who have learned it properly have no issues using it.
The "many" you talk about have never properly learned CTE.
Classic proof. PJ still argues over the importance of video proof, for the zillionth time.
So, if I produce a video where I state that I use the little green man with a hit here sign that is all that needed as proof then huh.
I state that I wait until he walks out on the table with the sign to point at the OB. I point with my cue where he is standing.
I then state he raises the sign to the point needed to make the ball.
I then do the that shot and make it.
Bingo....proof of the little green man with a hit here sign as a valid aiming system that anyone can use.
It must be proof cause I made a video using it.
I state that I wait until he walks out on the table with the sign to point at the OB. I point with my cue where he is standing.
I then state he raises the sign to the point needed to make the ball.
I then do the that shot and make it.
Bingo....proof of the little green man with a hit here sign as a valid aiming system that anyone can use.
It must be proof cause I made a video using it.