Jay, those are some serious heavyweights of Hollywood history you listed there...I'm wondering was there also a respect for the equipment back then to the point where any of those big stars had a gold crown installed in their homes?
Or back then, was a table just a table?
Did players look to play on serious equipment with various pocket sizes?
All of the above had tables in their homes, most of them beautiful Gold Crowns. They were serious about the game and wanted only the best equipment.
And the answer to the second question is a resounding YES! The best players were always looking for the best equipment to play on, not unlike today. Many of the top players refused to play on bar tables, calling them toys and worse.
P.S. Ronnie Allen carried his own set of balls for big money matches, just like Mosconi always did for his exhibitions. Ed Kelly had a blue circle cue ball he kept in his case. I saw Richie search through several sets of balls before he found a cue ball he liked, before starting a serious money game. The top players always wanted tight pockets for the major tournaments and that's why we went a little over the top at the Peter Vitalie Invitational in Los Angeles in 1987. There has never been (before or since) a major pool tournament played on pockets this tight. You could literally hang a ball in the very deep jaws of a corner pocket and you could not hit the ball going down the rail! Shooting an object ball down the rail was a very tricky proposition, just like on a snooker table, and I saw many balls missed from two diamonds out! Sigel missed one like that in his semifinal match against Efren, although he did go on to win the match.
Last edited: