At around 49:00 he says he stays low left on warm up strokes to aid in his aiming, very interesting.
I have noticed that before. Maybe it keeps his focus on the cueball/object ball relationship better as the cue is not in the picture.
Or he is pivoting from the left CB edge like described in this aiming system here:
http://www.billiardsthegame.com/offset-and-pivot-aiming-systems-395
Why always on the left then ?
Its explained in the link I gave in the post before, did you read it?
Some systems require pivot from both sides of the CB, this one is made so you can pivot only from one side, from the left for right handers since its natural because your bridge hand comes from the left side, its awkward to pivot from the right edge of the CB for a right hander.
Its all written on the link I gave you, but never mind, I wrote it here for you.
Why always on the left then ?
Ok.
If he's cutting the ball to the right more than 30*,
wouldn't that left edge be lined up to air?
Nothing on the ob at all?
Ok.
If he's cutting the ball to the right more than 30*,
wouldn't that left edge be lined up to air?
Nothing on the ob at all?
Please read the website on the link I gave you first.
He is not aligning cue to the point on the OB.
You align on the alignment lines that connect CB and OB.
Then just pivot from the left edge of the CB when in full stance, cue is supposed to be angled a little and just the tip pointing to the edge of the CB, its not pointing at anything on the OB, thats what alignment lines are there for (thats why you have three of them in this particular system).
I did check out the link, but this system makes very little sense to me. I mean, with See or CTE its easy, you align and then pivot one way or the other to make it thinner or thicker. It makes sense geometrically. With this system you align to a perception and then pivot, but the pivot must be entirely feel based. Either you have to align thinner on cuts to the right than cuts to the left (if you start from the left) and/or you have to pivot less. In any case I don't see the reason why you would pivot at all, unless it is to sort of "torque" your stance into place, and even this doesn't make a whole lot of sense if the pivot "lengths" are different. If you are going by feel anyway, it seems much easier to just use the quarter system, since you can then get on to a straight line, which should be easier.
I'll try this system out over the weekend and see if I can even make a single ball with it. I'd be impressed with myself if I could.
Anyway thanks for the link.![]()