good point. I don't have much experience with what I suppose are "treated" leather tips, but I've seen phenolic tips crack cue balls
If the tip is harder than the cb, then the chalk is what will cause scratches and divots on the ball.
good point. I don't have much experience with what I suppose are "treated" leather tips, but I've seen phenolic tips crack cue balls
If the tip is harder than the cb, then the chalk is what will cause scratches and divots on the ball.
again, I'm learning here- can a tip *be* harder than the cb?
I'm with you here, King T. I'm not quite as sure as you that the spectators like it, but I do agree that what the spectators, as a group, want matters far more than whether I like the jump cue. As I've said, however, I'm convinced that the debate is moot and that jump cues are here to stay. Those aspiring to a career in pro pool better practice with the short stick.SJM, the spectators like it and we need all the help we can get. It does take skill so we cant pretend that everybody with a jump cue has the skills of the guys that seem to never miss with one. You and I surely remember when there was no such thing as a break cue or a template rack or all this chalk that prevents mis-cues.., just say'n it aint that bad is it?
Apparently you didn't read (at the end of my paragraph) the three recommended safeties to counter jump-escapes, young padawan.It could be time for some people tighten up their lazy safety position play.
Does it actually make it better in some fashion, or is this just a biased personal opinion by those who are not fans of jump cues...? I'm not singling you out here SJM. Making a general statement.The best players can succeed without a jump stick. Fedor Gorst, possibly the best jumper (at very least in the conversation with Jayson Shaw, Albin Ouschan and Ko Pin Yi for that designation) dominated at the 2022 Derby City Classic, winning about $60,000 in just nine days. Jump cues are not permitted at the Derby City Classic, and it makes for a better event.
How about they put a spotlight on weak safe play..? As far as compromising the integrity of the game.... I think you're blowing this a tad out of proportion, especially when players are continually pulling moves on one another to gain an advantage.Jump cues make the game look cheap and compromise its integrity.
Bad comparison. Let pretend they did away with the jump cue in pool, but in conjunction also tossed out the post rail contact rule. Would that cheapen the game..? Because that's what snooker is now.For those of you who watch snooker, do you feel the introduction of the jump cue would add anything?
The value of weak safeties is diminished. A well played one is just as good as it's ever been. The reality is that jump cues have a shone a light on how undeveloped this aspect of the game is for most players, safeties I mean.While there's no denying that the use of the jump cue requires skill, the net effect is that the value of safeties is diminished and the penalty for hooking yourself is reduced. That doesn't sit well with this old schooler.
but not too gimmicky for you to get good at it though, right?Apparently you didn't read (at the end of my paragraph) the three recommended safeties to counter jump-escapes, young padawan.
I can jump and play safeties very well, tyvm. I just feel it's gimmicky and not traditional.
What's next-- Predator "pitching wedges"?![]()
Apparently you didn't read (at the end of my paragraph) the three recommended safeties to counter jump-escapes, young padawan.
I can jump and play safeties very well, tyvm. I just feel it's gimmicky and not traditional.
What's next-- Predator "pitching wedges"?![]()
The chart appears to max out at 99 for hardness, if that is the case that doesn't mean leather is as hard as phenolic it just means they both reach the limit of the scale.Go ask Dr.Dave
I disagree. The last pro event I watched where jump shots were used ended in one of two situations....I'm old school, not a fan of jumping, especially at the pro level. The game is already becoming easy enough for these studs with their fancy ld shafts and near perfect playing conditions lol.
That said though, jump cues make cue makers money, so unfortunately jumping is here to stay for the next several years, especially with Predator sponsoring so many events. (I have a love/hate relationship with Predator btw lol).
Jump-escaping (with a specialized jump cue) out of a well-played safety is a cop-out imo. Any banger can learn pretty quickly how to at least clear a ball with a decently designed jump cue.
And the funniest thing is that most amateurs can't control their jumps in a manner that actually gives them an advantage over kicking! In fact, I welcome average players to jump (especially on a small bar table) when I play a safe against them in a league match. Their lack of control gives me ball-in-hand often lol. Anyways.....
At the pro level, however, it feels like jumping is cheating. It's just too easy for them with the specialized stick. (Use your playing cue like men!)
And it's definitely not how our pool fore-fathers intended the game to be played.
Hell, I can't think of one pro player over age 60 that says they're a good addition to the game.
The good news is that more and more leagues and tournaments, worldwide, are banning them, and it's a trend I think (and hope) will continue.
In the meantime I have three recommendations:
1) When you play a safety, don't roll the object ball near a pocket or the money ball. (I see women pros do this all the time btw lol.)
2) Learn to play really good lockdown safeties--- lock the cue ball up against another ball so they can't jump.
3) Send the object ball behind a row of balls, taking away the "landing area" for a jump shot.
Have a great day!
P.S.-- I can jump (and kick) well btw. I just don't agree with jumping as part of our sport. Gimmicky.
I didn't make up the chart.The chart appears to max out at 99 for hardness, if that is the case that doesn't mean leather is as hard as phenolic it just means they both reach the limit of the scale.
Thanks for a well presented and well-reasoned post. Much sense in what you say, and as you have noted, restricting use of the jump cue to the first shot of an inning only would be in my comfort zone for sure.Does it actually make it better in some fashion, or is this just a biased personal opinion by those who are not fans of jump cues...? I'm not singling you out here SJM. Making a general statement.
How about they put a spotlight on weak safe play..? As far as compromising the integrity of the game.... I think you're blowing this a tad out of proportion, especially when players are continually pulling moves on one another to gain an advantage.
Not that I'm saying anyone has to, but when I jump on to my FB account I can hammered with jump shot highlight reels. The Styer "jump, 2 rail kick". The Atenico "double jump"... The recent Yapp, "jump long pot and draw 3/4 table". Apparently fans like cheap... Time to embrace it or take up lawn bowling.
Bad comparison. Let pretend they did away with the jump cue in pool, but in conjunction also tossed out the post rail contact rule. Would that cheapen the game..? Because that's what snooker is now.
You can't compare checkers to chess
The value of weak safeties is diminished. A well played one is just as good as it's ever been. The reality is that jump cues have a shone a light on how undeveloped this aspect of the game is for most players, safeties I mean.
While we differ on our opinions of jump cues and the game. We do agree on the safety net for weak positional play it has become. Much like I think the short cue has highlighted poor safety play. It's also allowed players to under develop their positional accuracy. This is why I fully agree with you that the jump cue should be limited to use during the first shot of an inning. So, only a means to escape a safety by their opponent and not a tool to recover from poor position.
That said, the above would remove some interesting aspects of pattern play. I never see it on the professional level but I know I have played patterns with integrated jump shot within it. Not advisable but entertaining none the less...lol
Thanks for a well presented and well reasoned post. Much sense in what you say, and as you have noted, restricting use of the jump cue to the first shot of an inning only would be in my comfort zone for sure.
key word is 'skill'. jumping with a short cue is too easy. nothing against jumping, just a piece of equipment that makes a shot basically a no-brainer. best tournament i've ever attended is DCC and they allow jumps but no shorty cues. never heard a complaint about the rule. kicking,especially multi-rails, takes far more skill than hopping with a jump cue.FWIW, I‘ll occasionally push out to a position that leaves a jump shot, against an opponent that I know to be weak in that area. If he tries to jump or kick, it usually ends in my favor. Likewise if he gives the shot back to me.
Having a wide variety of skills is just one more hallmark of a better player…
Aye, the spectators like it. I think they like kicking too but you rarely, if ever, hear anyone complaining about kicking cues. Maybe cos there ain't none.SJM, the spectators like it and we need all the help we can get. It does take skill so we cant pretend that everybody with a jump cue has the skills of the guys that seem to never miss with one. You and I surely remember when there was no such thing as a break cue or a template rack or all this chalk that prevents mis-cues.., just say'n it aint that bad is it?
What are you basing 'more than half the time' on?? One event you watched? Reason i ask this is i watch a lot of pro pool on various streams and from what i see they don't sell-out anywhere near 50% of the time when using a short cue to jump.I disagree. The last pro event I watched where jump shots were used ended in one of two situations....
They got a hit but missed the shot. Cue ball ended up badly for them. Opponent might as well have had ball in hand.
They made the shot but had zero chance on the next shot. On one jump, the obstructing ball didnt get cleared. And these were pros!
Jumping isnt the "easy" shot for the pros that everyone seems to think they are. More then half the time they end up selling out.