My point is, if the insurance company required someone else to rack the final 5 racks, then it's not only the 6th rack that violated the requirement (hence the importance of running that 11th rack). Earl racked his own in the 9th game. Its no wonder the insurance company fought this.
I can see the insurance company not wanting to fight that the 10th rack nine ball combo wasn't caught on video. With that many witnesses there's no way they could win. Doubtful the insurance company outlined the recording requirements in detail. But it seems there were multiple violations of the insurance company's loosely defined (I guess) requirements.
Oh well...letter of the law vs spirit of the law I guess. Cheaper for the insurance company to get out rather than to try to prove Earl did not run 10 racks for a million.
This might be the most intriguing video I own. So much history before/during/after the event that it helps shine light on. With that said it may also lure the conspiracy theorists into pointing out these arguably trivial details. I'm hoping not to come across as one of them.
I was a HUGE fan until I met up with Earl about 5-6 years ago. I put him on my $#!+ list after witnessing his incredibly sour attitude at a 10 ball event. Then recently someone brought him to Steinway where he is now the house pro. He is finally at home and getting his stroke back, and last year's Turning Stone win has coming back to life, with more support and so less bitterness. This video just adds some spice to it all. I'm one of his biggest fans now.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2