Efren has brought a lot of answers to one-hole problems.....
...but that is not one of them.....it was being played in the 60s.
Been around since before the Dead Sea was sick...
Still a fine shot. That guy is pretty good.
Efren has brought a lot of answers to one-hole problems.....
...but that is not one of them.....it was being played in the 60s.
What does that have to do with this thread? That's the second time you had to mention that while taking a cheap shot. Grumpy old nine baller would be a handle better suited for you.
Nevertheless, you still don't understand. Don't try.
Yeah, you're the only one who knows anything.
ONB
Yeah, you're the only one who knows anything.
ONB
Thanks, is the whole match available?
As others have said, this is a very old shot that has been around forever. I doubt that there is a 1pocket player of any experience that hasn't shot it. In fact, before opening up the link, I thought the discussion would be about the slightly more exotic Cliff Joyner shot, were the back ball is banked two rails, the first ball is pushed towards the shooter's side rail, and the CB goes three rails for a long and safe position.
IMO, this shot is not so bad, even needing one because, if shot properly, worse case, the CB draws back to a pretty safe position and both balls will be near the shooter's pocket.
Technically, yes, it is wrong to put both balls into play down table needing one. However, like every other rule there are exceptions and one of those is when you are a big favorite to leave both balls near your hole and the CB at the far end. If nothing else it complicates your opponent's defensive reply. In addition, I believe that this is one of those shots in which a player not only judges the shot and score, he's also weighing: who he is playing, how the set has gone, how clean the balls and cloth are, what size the pockets are, and last but not least -- am I Efren Reyes.
IOW, some of the normal rules for us mortals do not apply to Efren. He can shoot the shot, even against a high caliber player like Richie, and probably still feel pretty good about out moving and shooting him. To a lesser extent, we all must also make those kind of judgements and not blindly adhere to all the usual tenets and realize there are exceptions to the rules that can shift the odds in our favor.
Lou Figueroa
I hadn't noticed that. Sometimes it's better not to notice your opponent's moves.It's a nice shot, but nobody has mentioned Richie's mini "move". I believe the rule is you place the ball that's made on the spot and then put the owed ball behind it; Richie conveniently found the green 6 ball to place in front, which is the hardest ball to see on green cloth. It didn't appear to have bothered Efren, but it is still a move.
The move is the teacher.
Dave
It's a nice shot, but nobody has mentioned Richie's mini "move". I believe the rule is you place the ball that's made on the spot and then put the owed ball behind it; Richie conveniently found the green 6 ball to place in front, which is the hardest ball to see on green cloth. It didn't appear to have bothered Efren, but it is still a move.
The move is the teacher.
Dave
And there's a reason this shot exists, to piss off poor players like you. I don't know anyone who plays 1p that doesn't know this shot and isn't affraid to shot it either. You seem to be the only scared one in the room.
I've only heard of that regarding the 8ball. Also with this I've never heard of the spotting the ball made first as the front ball.
Exactly. it makes no sense to master this move but then be afraid to use it during competition.....if efren rattles the pocket, look,where the cue all was left...yeah, this guy might know a thing or two. :thumbup:
And evidently Efren doesn't have to get out his reading glasses like I need to do for the shot.... Of course you need to make sure your opponent has the balls straight and froze if you want to pull it off.
The only rule I recall regarding the order of spotting is that at nine ball when a lot of balls used to get spotted, they were spotted in numerical order. I just checked on onepocket.org and they say nothing about spotting order but they do refer to the WPA rules for things not covered. The WPA rules do not mention a spotting order in the general spotting rule and there are no WPA one pocket rules.... Also with this I've never heard of the spotting the ball made first as the front ball.
Efren has brought a lot of answers to one-hole problems.....
...but that is not one of them.....it was being played in the 60s.
Efren would probably win against anyone that follows your suggestion....of course how many {of us} will be playing Efren anytime soon?![]()