All I know is that NONE of todays pros have ever beat me!
Of course I haven't played any of them but that's besides the point.
Nice...UNDEFEATED! I will play any pro 9 ball on the barbox with the wild 5 and the break....ANYONE?? Come get some

All I know is that NONE of todays pros have ever beat me!
Of course I haven't played any of them but that's besides the point.
I am sure there must be many interesting stories where the best player in the area beat a pro in an even race for a fair amount of money. NO SPOT.
^This.
I spend as much time as I can donating to a local shortstop and a pro level player that play out of my home pool hall.
They are both spectacular players, but as Neil mentioned, the difference is consistency. They both are capable of running out from everywhere, but the difference is that the pro level player is rarely out of line. He is on the right side of the ball the vast majority of the time and his safety and kicking play are better.
The great thing about Efren is he will actually let a short short shortstop like me actually win a game. It is a golden feeling even though you know he let you win.
Ghost ball <- actually just a banger....
Yes- He ALWAYS tries to give a game to anyone who is way under him. Even in the DCC, he tried to unsuccessfully give away a One Pocket game to a female non 1P player. Even vs Jeanette one time she played so bad, he threw her games.
I also saw him in a pro event where his weak opponent completely missed the object ball THREE TIMES but he never told Efren "Ball in hand" . Efren shot all 3 from where they lay. Final score-Not close.
Top pros can give shortstops the 5 out. I think that's pretty f'n good.
Played a number of pros over the years. What you find it that their shotmaking is not much better than an A players. However, they are a little more consistent. They miss less than the shortstops do.
The biggest difference may not readily be seen unless one knows what to look for. That is, cue ball control. The pro will be on the "right" side of the ob more often. The pro will usually have easier shots to shoot. The pro will play better safes because of that added cue ball control.
Those things may or may not be readily seen. In a short race, to 7 or even 9, the lesser player will win some of the time. However, over time, the gap will widen quite a bit. The pros consistency will add up quickly.
Where you might be running ones, two's, three's, and the occasional four, they are running two's three's, four's, and the occasional 5,6 or 7 or more. Those more consistent runs add up quick in a money game.
Since we are on the subject of pool being a dying sport and pro's should consider another occupation. I would like to ask how good are they exactly? Has anyone played against a pro before?
Are you talking about a top Pro player or a lower level pro?
There are lots of top amateur players as good as the lower ranked pro player.
LOL...and some players are considered a pro one week, then an amateur the next week.
I actually think this is one of the most common misconceptions about professional pool players -- they just control the cue ball better. No actually most of them pocket the balls a lot better too.
That's what I'm sort of getting at here. There are guys at my billiard room that can run racks just like the pros.
So how do you judge a pro? Consistency. If a guy at my local pool hall can break and run in sets of 4 and 5.
Who's to say he's not a pro either. Consistency? Well, the guy has a 6 figure job and family already and if he wanted to focus and practice on pool 100%, he would have no problems.
A good shortstop will play pro speed many times. If a good shortstop is in stroke, and the pro is not, the shortstop will beat him in a tournament match.