To play, gamble or compete is not the same as stealing Freddy of that you must surely agree? I go to the pool hall for all three reasons that you list but stealing is not one of them and playing people that you KNOW you can beat is stealing.
So Freddy, do you believe that it is OK for either (the roadie OR the local) to take another's picture and inquire with their friends about their level of play and then discuss that information with their "corporation" but it is not OK to knock someone's action just for the sake of wiseing up another local as to what would be a fair game?
You bring up some good points. I like to see action as much as the next guy but I resent roadies collecting all of the data on the locals then playing only those whom they know they can beat. I have seen MANY road players of national repute, drop an "even" game like a hot potatoe. This situation seems to repeat itself over and over. While no one plays to lose, it seems that MOST road players turn and run when they find out that they have a tough game. And if they break even at a game after a few hours, you can almost be assured that they won't play THAT game again.
I think back to the "old days" when Earl Heisler and Louie Knott ran the Sports Palace. They would provide information about a player's speed in a way that was not direct. If asked, "Would I have a decent game if I played so and so with the 7 ball?", they would answer, "How much are you playing for?" And if you were betting your limit in a race and were sure to lose they might offer "Well, you might want to try playing him for cheap money." They didn't tell you exactly what you needed to win or break even but at least provided some information as to keep you from losing your whole bank roll.
But all in all even though I like the action and respect the hard job that road players have, I prefer to see road players playing games that are competitive for both parties, the mark and the roadie.
JoeyA
So Freddy, do you believe that it is OK for either (the roadie OR the local) to take another's picture and inquire with their friends about their level of play and then discuss that information with their "corporation" but it is not OK to knock someone's action just for the sake of wiseing up another local as to what would be a fair game?
You bring up some good points. I like to see action as much as the next guy but I resent roadies collecting all of the data on the locals then playing only those whom they know they can beat. I have seen MANY road players of national repute, drop an "even" game like a hot potatoe. This situation seems to repeat itself over and over. While no one plays to lose, it seems that MOST road players turn and run when they find out that they have a tough game. And if they break even at a game after a few hours, you can almost be assured that they won't play THAT game again.
I think back to the "old days" when Earl Heisler and Louie Knott ran the Sports Palace. They would provide information about a player's speed in a way that was not direct. If asked, "Would I have a decent game if I played so and so with the 7 ball?", they would answer, "How much are you playing for?" And if you were betting your limit in a race and were sure to lose they might offer "Well, you might want to try playing him for cheap money." They didn't tell you exactly what you needed to win or break even but at least provided some information as to keep you from losing your whole bank roll.
But all in all even though I like the action and respect the hard job that road players have, I prefer to see road players playing games that are competitive for both parties, the mark and the roadie.
JoeyA
freddy the beard said:It depends on whether you have a huster's mentality or a square-johns. A hustler is looking to create action, ALLOW action, and WIN MONEY. If you are hanging in the poolroom with a hustler's mentality then you should learn to hate the knockers and the mother hens that run around looking to "protect" their flock. If on the other hand you want to make sure that every game is exactly even, and take it personal when you see someone going "off," why did you pick a poolroom to spend your time in the first place?
When I was coming up, knocking was a dangerous profession. If a player came around that I knew and nobody else did, it was professional courtesy to keep your mouth shut and let grown men take care of themselves. The pluses for this type of behavior was many; you could bet on the side, you could discreetly ask the player for a piece of his action, you could ask for a consideration bite after the player won. By keeping the player anonymous, you could take him to other spots and win more money. If you had a treacherous nature, as some did then, after accumulating trust by keeping silent you could later steer the player into a game where he couldnt win. If players knew they could go places and get action and not get knocked, this encouraged other players, some not so good, to come around and want to play in your place. This made for an action spot where everybody had a chance to make money. In Bensingers, and Detroit's Rack and Cue, knockers were looked upon as pariahs and were always at risk for physical violence.
Example: I brought Jack Cooney to the Black South and West Side poolrooms to play. There were several players in each room that knew Cooney. None said a word. However, after Jack took each joint off, they all came around with their hands out and all received fair consideration. I always thought that you went to a poolroom to play, gamble or compete. Knocking does nothing to further those concepts.
the Beard