IMO the IPT will (and probably should) become exclusive at some point in the future, if not next year then in 2008 if it takes off. On the positive side, obviously the IPT provides pool with big money and excitement and the chance to become a legitimate televised sport alongside say golf or tennis; this is what we've all been waiting and hoping for. And if the IPT becomes *the* professional pool organization worldwide, then exclusive contracts of some sort are almost a given.
Still, there is a downside, and to speak frankly and openly of this downside is not to deny the tremendous positive impact of the IPT, nor is it to slander KT, the IPT, the players, or anyone else. One thing we might all agree on is that if the IPT succeeds (and it appears that it will), then the sport of pool is about to experience a dramatic change, and big changes, even good changes, are generally accompanied by unforseen consequences.
Having stated my little disclaimer, here are some concerns about IPT exclusivity and the IPT as a whole.
It would be nice to get some variety eventually. Right now, the DCC, US open, WPC and a few others are all great events, and they all have a different "feel" to them. Certainly, if IPT becomes exclusive, these events will suffer. If every IPT event is run by the same crew in the same way, it could get monotonous. Now, obviously the IPT know how to put on one hell of a pool tourney, but these other events each bring something unique, and they also have tradition behind them. It's too early to say, of course, because there have only been 2 IPT events, but I think a pool "tour" should include some variety, like in tennis of golf. And running the same event 12 times a year in different casinos is not quite what I mean.
Along similar lines, it would be sad if 8-ball becomes overly dominant to the detriment of 9-ball, one-pocket, and straight pool, etc. It would be great if the IPT had big events involving other games. We all know how KT feels about 9-ball, but maybe he would go for 10-ball... or maybe rotation... dammit I like shooting the balls in order I don't care what anyone else says... Now, arguably, 9-ball was dominant before the IPT came around, but in one-pocket is healthy and straight pool seems to be on the upswing. I would also say that it would be good to have some events on faster cloth, just to change up the conditions as well as the games played (but keep the tight pockets). I don't think faster cloth is all that much easier, but it brings out different skills.
I should mention that if the DCC or WPC or any other events suffer due to the IPT, it probably won't be the exclusive contracts that do it. Even if there is no exclusivity clause, the IPT will still become more or less exclusive "de facto," due to scheduling difficulties and differences in payouts. It may be sad, but it's almost necessary for pool to become a big time spectator sport. As someone pointed out earlier, you can't fly down to Kentucy and hang out with Tiger Woods and Vijay Singh for a week while they match up 24 hours a day at a tournament with a first prize of $20k. If the top pool pros all become millionaire celebrities (and I hope they do, they deserve it) then everything changes.
Overally, if the whole thing succeeds it should be great, even if there are exclusive contracts, but there will be some casualties. My only real concern is whether KT knows the game and its history enough to make decisions that are not only profitable, but also respectful of the game of pool. A lot of the comments I've heard from KT himself are not entirely encouraging, but he's got some knowledgeable people on board like Deno and Sigel.
PS I can recognize that as a pool dilettante, I have the luxury of being a purist, and what's good for me personally is not the same as what's good for pool. I don't need to earn a living at pool. If the IPT really takes off and five years from now the top pros are all flying to tournaments in private jets, but at the same time the DCC and the US Open fall by the wayside, and nobody plays anything seriously except 8-ball, that would have to be considered a favorable outcome, even though I personally like different games and tournaments where the players and the fans mingle.
Still, there is a downside, and to speak frankly and openly of this downside is not to deny the tremendous positive impact of the IPT, nor is it to slander KT, the IPT, the players, or anyone else. One thing we might all agree on is that if the IPT succeeds (and it appears that it will), then the sport of pool is about to experience a dramatic change, and big changes, even good changes, are generally accompanied by unforseen consequences.
Having stated my little disclaimer, here are some concerns about IPT exclusivity and the IPT as a whole.
It would be nice to get some variety eventually. Right now, the DCC, US open, WPC and a few others are all great events, and they all have a different "feel" to them. Certainly, if IPT becomes exclusive, these events will suffer. If every IPT event is run by the same crew in the same way, it could get monotonous. Now, obviously the IPT know how to put on one hell of a pool tourney, but these other events each bring something unique, and they also have tradition behind them. It's too early to say, of course, because there have only been 2 IPT events, but I think a pool "tour" should include some variety, like in tennis of golf. And running the same event 12 times a year in different casinos is not quite what I mean.
Along similar lines, it would be sad if 8-ball becomes overly dominant to the detriment of 9-ball, one-pocket, and straight pool, etc. It would be great if the IPT had big events involving other games. We all know how KT feels about 9-ball, but maybe he would go for 10-ball... or maybe rotation... dammit I like shooting the balls in order I don't care what anyone else says... Now, arguably, 9-ball was dominant before the IPT came around, but in one-pocket is healthy and straight pool seems to be on the upswing. I would also say that it would be good to have some events on faster cloth, just to change up the conditions as well as the games played (but keep the tight pockets). I don't think faster cloth is all that much easier, but it brings out different skills.
I should mention that if the DCC or WPC or any other events suffer due to the IPT, it probably won't be the exclusive contracts that do it. Even if there is no exclusivity clause, the IPT will still become more or less exclusive "de facto," due to scheduling difficulties and differences in payouts. It may be sad, but it's almost necessary for pool to become a big time spectator sport. As someone pointed out earlier, you can't fly down to Kentucy and hang out with Tiger Woods and Vijay Singh for a week while they match up 24 hours a day at a tournament with a first prize of $20k. If the top pool pros all become millionaire celebrities (and I hope they do, they deserve it) then everything changes.
Overally, if the whole thing succeeds it should be great, even if there are exclusive contracts, but there will be some casualties. My only real concern is whether KT knows the game and its history enough to make decisions that are not only profitable, but also respectful of the game of pool. A lot of the comments I've heard from KT himself are not entirely encouraging, but he's got some knowledgeable people on board like Deno and Sigel.
PS I can recognize that as a pool dilettante, I have the luxury of being a purist, and what's good for me personally is not the same as what's good for pool. I don't need to earn a living at pool. If the IPT really takes off and five years from now the top pros are all flying to tournaments in private jets, but at the same time the DCC and the US Open fall by the wayside, and nobody plays anything seriously except 8-ball, that would have to be considered a favorable outcome, even though I personally like different games and tournaments where the players and the fans mingle.