Well I used red rubber gasket material from a hardware store on my table. The thickness was 1/8" So far I'm happy with it. But then again its only been on the table for maybe 2 months tops.
Lets see who can contribute the best rationale for this topic? Please state thickness and durometer also. Years is use? etc
Are they needed anymore? Is there a better solution?
Thanks for your input, did they cut cleanly and easily? Did they have a texture to them which allowed them to glue well?
I am considering using these facings on my table. ANt comments?
http://www.pooltablefeltcloth.com/Cushions-Supplies/cushion-facings.shtm
It could be that they don't know.its a bit surprising to me that our local resident experts have not commented on this topic yet.
its a bit surprising to me that our local resident experts have not commented on this topic yet. I prefer facings that are softer vs harder, ie over 70
its a bit surprising to me that our local resident experts have not commented on this topic yet. I prefer facings that are softer vs harder, ie over 70
Ok John, I'll comment...LOL I use 3/16" neoprene with a duro rating of 60. 1/8" inch facings will NOT stop the cloth in the corner pockets from stencial cutting the subrail bevel angle through the cloth covering the pocket facings! The first cuts to show up are on the foot end rail, then the head rail, then in time the side rails in the corner pockets. Now, how many times have you guys seen the cloth cut at the facings in the pockets....think about it!!!! Then check out the facings, and you'll see the same damage of cutting through the facings as well.
Glen![]()
Are these the bad ones???????????
![]()
and where do you check the hardness on the facings you use? what about the rest of my questions on the thread? I expect more from you on this topic. Is Diamond still using the ones I have on my Pro model from about 5 or 6 years ago? I hate Brunswick facings on the GC V.
Where is my friend Scruffy and Jay on this topic?
John, I don't need any gage to tell me what works for facingsI have 26 years experience in this area
Look, let me give you an example. Pool Sharks in Vegas has 2 Diamond 9ft ProAm's. The both get a hell of a lot of play. One of the tables is located in the pit area, the other one is located in the upper first row of tables. In about a 6 month period, with Simonis 860 Tour Blue cloth, I recovered the tables again. Now, at the time of recovery, the table in the pit had 3/16th's neoprene for facings, and the table in the first row had 1/8th" neoprene facings. The table in the pit still had perfect cloth in the pockets, while the table with the 1/8th's facings had cut through both sides of the corner pocket facings in all 4 corner pockets. While recovering both tables, I changed the 1/8th" facings out for 3/16th's ones. 9 months later, I recovered both the tables again, only this time, neither one of the tables had any cut cloth in the corner pockets.
I don't buy facings from anyone, I buy them from rubber dealers. You can buy neoprene from 3' or 4' wide rolls by the running foot. Per running foot you get about 12 sets of facings, at a cost of about $8 to $10 a running foot, that makes puts your sets of facings at under a $1 a set.
Glen
Ok here is my analysis.
First we need to know how many hrs of play occurred on each table. This would be helpful wouldn't it?
The players on the pit table are more likely to be better and their balls go in the pocket and don't hit the facings as much correct? Perhaps the owners only let good players use the tables that are most recently covered. Were both of these drop pocket tables????? Maybe the other table gets alot of one pocket play?
My initial questions are still left unanswered.
Your data is still very helpful but the real issue of my question goes without any detection.
There is much more here and no offense but I think if you have all the tools you say you do in that truck of yours you should be able to make room for this little guage.
I go to the doctor and want my blood preasure taken, he grabs my arm and says it fine. I ask him, hey don't you have to wrap my arm and do your little test with that guage you have. He says he doesn't need a guage and he can tell me. Well maybe he can but its the last time I go to him.
Now back to your facings, are you saying they are 3-16 after you cut them or before?
Since you did the tables before and you know there is a problem or believe there is with 1-8 facings why didn't you change them the first time? Is it because there wasn't any problems the first time?
In conclusion, that room must have more than 2 tables. BUt you went there first from your statement and did 2 tables, then back again to do another 2, the same two. What about the other tables? From what you have said it seems that these 2 tables get too much play. My guess maybe table2 not in the pit area is used for 1P more than the other. Now I have to wait and see when I go out there.
John...did I mention that both tables were 9ft Diamond ProAms? The room has 27 tables, but I only recover the Diamonds, at one point I recovered 10 other Global 9fts in the room for an IPT qualifier tournament, but I don't regularly recover pool tables in any one place. Do some more research John. The cuts in the pockets have nothing to do with playing one pocketAs I already said, the first two cuts will show up on the foot end rail corner pocket facings, then the head rail corner pocket facings. The foot shows the wear first because of the balls being pocketed on the break!!
Glen