Food for Thought Regarding a Truly Objective Aiming Method

Status
Not open for further replies.
We're up to 40 posts & only 2 other than mine are on topic.

The vitriol & complete lack of human decency by the vocal contingent as shown itself in spades, so to speak.

Perhaps I should make it clear to everyone that views pics of beautiful WOMEN that they are considered child molesters by two members here & one goes by the moniker of 'SLOPPY POCKETS'.

I guess he plays too much 'pocket pool' down in the basement where his pool table is hidden out of site & his pockets have gotten 'sloppy'.

Sorry... I got pulled down into the games with the 'children'.
 
Whether it's you or any other person on the planet, try as you/we might, NOBODY can be in his league as a first-class dick or come close to his level of insanity. And it really is insanity.

What's unbelievably insane is the people in charge here let him continue this Fast Larry crap with the novel length posts, talking to himself, and having a record setting number of posts on a daily basis that exceeds anything in the history of this or ANY forum on the internet.

Why is this being allowed? Makes no sense, none at all.

Consider yourself warned
 
Anyone that would stoop so low as to even bring up child molestation in any disagreement regarding pool...

completely disqualifies themselves from any credibility regarding moral fiber or any other sensible discussion.

I just sincerely hope & Pray that that individual was not projecting themselves out.

As I've said... if I had any indication that was truly the case I would have already used a nickle.
 
Last edited:
Anyone that would stoop so low as to even bring up child molestation in any disagreement regarding pool...

completely disqualifies themselves from any credibility regarding moral fiber or any other sensible discussion.

I just sincerely hope & Pray that that individual was not projecting themselves out.

As I've said... if I had any indication that was truly the case I would have already use a nickle.


That's the third time you've said this.......should I report it to Howerton?

Again, waiting on your real name. You have nothing to hide, right?
 
Last edited:
This warning is going to all involved parties.

If you guys move off topic and stray into anymore personal attacks, there will be bans.

Not going to sit and read every post, I'll deal with infractions as they arise.
 
I've pretty much stayed out of the CTE wars..........you'll be hard pressed to find even one recent post (within 2 years) of me arguing for or against the system.

He gets involved in many different threads (think CJ tenure) and ends up coming off as a know-it-all......ends up pissing multiple people off. This is a clear pattern since he joined AZB.

As far as the "child molester" thing. I never said he was a child molester although the way it went down some could infer that..............my bad, poorly written by me at the time. It was in the long "Elbow Drop" thread where I questioned one of his favorite posters (not CJ).........and of course he was in dead stroke with his usual drivel. Background checks for Billiard Instructors came up......well I better stop here.

14000+ posts!!...........10% soft porn.

It was not my intention to refer to any specific individual or exchange, it was more of a general sentiment. I might have had that incident in the back of my mind, though. You come across as a knowledgable and good player, and as such do not fit the criteria.

As to the porn comment: Show me a healthy man with access to the internet that has never watched porn of any kind, soft or otherwise and there is a pretty good chance he is either a fundamentalist nutjob of the kind that is dangerous to others or a liar. Sexual repression and perversion seem to go hand in hand, as well. Even Osama reportedly had a porn collection, though that might be propaganda. Wether you like it or not, porn is pretty much the driving force behind the internet and probably photography before that. Interesting side note: The Vatican archives reportedly has the largest collection in the world of ancient pornography, so it's not a new phenomenon either. They might not let you see it, though:grin:.
 
Last edited:
It was not my intention to refer to any specific individual or exchange, it was more of a general sentiment. I might have had that incident in the back of my mind, though. You come across as a knowledgable and good player, and as such do not fit the criteria.

As to the porn comment: Show me a healthy man with access to the internet that has never watched porn of any kind, soft or otherwise. There is a pretty good chance he is either a fundamentalist nutjob of the kind that is dangerous to others or a liar. Sexual repression and perversion seem to go hand in hand, as well. Even Osama reportedly had a porn collection, though that might be propaganda. Wether you like it or not, porn is pretty much the driving force behind the internet and probably photography before that. Interesting side note: The Vatican archives reportedly has the largest collection in the world of ancient pornography, so it's not a new phenomenon either. They might not let you see it, though:grin:.

I had certainly thought better of you.

I'll just say that for employment reasons for a manage position, I have been interviewed & gone through a Federal Background Check.

I have been faithfully married to the same beautiful, on the inside & outside, women for coming up on 35 years & we dated for 7 before that.

I have 4 grown 'children', 3 college graduates with two having masters degrees in their fields & one CPA...

& my wife & I are still very sexually active.

Now I'm waiting for everyone else's Federal Background Check & interview process report before they make another post.

And I was hired for the position & served out the full term.

Best Wishes to ALL.
 
Last edited:
I had certainly thought better of you.

I'll just say that for employment reasons for a manage position, I have been interviewed & gone through a Federal Background Check.

I have been faithfully married to the same beautiful, on the inside & outside, women for coming up on 35 years & we dated for 7 before that.

I have 4 grown 'children', 3 college graduates with two having masters degrees in their fields & one CPA...

& my wife & I are still very sexually active.

Now I'm waiting for everyone else's Federal Background Check & interview process report before they make another post.

And I was hired for the position & served out the full term.

Best Wishes to ALL.

Sorry there was supposed to be an AND there. The meaning intended was that anyone who claims NOT to have watched porn is probably lying. Or a religious fundamentalist. Also the sexual repression/perversion connection is well established in litterature and empirical observation. Such that when someone does not indulge his (healthy and natural) curiosity about these things (which would include watching "pornography"), bad things can happen. Pornography is pretty randomly defined in most cultures anyway, so that what constitutes pornography might be somewhat unclear. I don't know how that meaning could be misconstrued? I've added the "and" if that makes it clearer.

I was in no way intending to refer to you as any of these things, nor would I ever.
 
Last edited:
Sorry there was supposed to be an AND there. The meaning intended was that anyone who claims NOT to have watched porn is probably lying. Or a religious fundamentalist. Also the sexual repression/perversion connection is well established in litterature and empirical observation. Such that when someone does not indulge his (healthy and natural) curiosity about these things, bad things can happen. I don't know how that meaning could be misconstrued? I've added the and if that makes it clearer.

There is a HUGE difference between a period & a Capitol letter of the first word of the next sentence...

& the word "and" between with no period or Capitol letter.

Since I was the topic of 'his' vulgar, vile, disgusting, & immoral implications,

I took your 'he' to be you talking about me.

The re-write makes is read entirely different.

Thanks for the re-write.
 
I feel like I should bump the initial 2 post to perhaps get the thread back on topic.

but there are rather many words in those explanations.

I invite anyone to read them & get this on topic if anyone has anything to say regarding the subjects.

If not then it can just sit for anyone to read if they so wish.

No one makes anyone read what they do not want to read.

I'm not forcing anything on anyone.

Best Wishes to All.
 
So what does everyone think regarding the elbow drop? It's obviously a push motion as the shoulder coils and engages into the sternum corax thus therefore causing extrabloratory spin to be injected upon into the cueball during it's rotation increasing the RPMs above maximum capacity.. At least that's what Mike Sigel told me in person down in Massachussets in 73 during the World Rotation finals at the county fair. Now I know he's not a science nerd like Pajamas or Jal Rule, but I trust his word the most. In fact I think I might still have the video on my phone of the interview and I can upload it on youtube later if yall want me to.

God bless
 
So what does everyone think regarding the elbow drop? It's obviously a push motion as the shoulder coils and engages into the sternum corax thus therefore causing extrabloratory spin to be injected upon into the cueball during it's rotation increasing the RPMs above maximum capacity.. At least that's what Mike Sigel told me in person down in Massachussets in 73 during the World Rotation finals at the county fair. Now I know he's not a science nerd like Pajamas or Jal Rule, but I trust his word the most. In fact I think I might still have the video on my phone of the interview and I can upload it on youtube later if yall want me to.

God bless

Just curious, is that a betamax phone, VHS, or one of the early 8mm ones?
 
please explain WHAT THOSE ADJUSTMENTS ARE and WHEN OR WHERE THEY OCCUR FOR CUT ANGLES THEY SUPPOSEDLY DON'T COVER?
Since you ask so nicely:

The number of system cut angles needed to ensure a shot can be made

minus the number of cut angles clearly defined by the system

= what the system doesn't cover "objectively".


pj <- pretty straightforward really
chgo
 
Since you ask so nicely:

The number of system cut angles needed to ensure a shot can be made

minus the number of cut angles clearly defined by the system

= what the system doesn't cover "objectively".


pj <- pretty straightforward really
chgo

Nicely & concisely said...

but you know what is coming.
 
Since you ask so nicely:

The number of system cut angles needed to ensure a shot can be made

minus the number of cut angles clearly defined by the system

= what the system doesn't cover "objectively".


pj <- pretty straightforward really
chgo


Would you please be so kind to produce a video illustrating the cut angles not covered by the system since those of us who know and use the system find that the system VISUALS ensure all shots can be made.

Attaining the CB to OB OBJECTIVE visuals clearly cover all cut angles and ensure a shot CAN be made and PROVEN to me made by many youtube videos for your viewing pleasure and greater understanding.

After 19 years you still haven't learned anything since you're still hung up on visuals being CUT ANGLES where the ball is struck just like you were with Hal's 3 Line Aiming (angle) System. They were only visuals. The ORIGINAL OFFSET of the TIP/SHAFT to those VISUALS and then the PIVOTS which changed the entire TIP/SHAFT ORIENTATION to the two balls ensured all cut angles could be made from those 3 visual alignments.

Be sure to include your video among those already on youtube. The video request is also for English, even though he hasn't been on a pool table for years. Grandchild responsibilities you know, as well as a ruptured disc and no desire to ever be in a pool room.

That would be pretty straight forward instead of the ongoing keyboard strikes where real pool is NOT PLAYED.
 
Last edited:
Yep, that's where the "adjustments" are made, alright.

pj
chgo

They certainly aren't willy nilly guesswork "feel" from the cosmos with lizard head bobbing like yours. They're OBJECTIVELY SEEN AND EXECUTED within the system INSTRUCTIONS.

Will your youtube video be forthcoming?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top