maybe? not sure, tell us all about himEver hear of Earl Strickland?
maybe? not sure, tell us all about himEver hear of Earl Strickland?
i Guess Earl doesn’t know either, and the majority of fans, and other professional players. But you’ve seen sigel live! Oooook lolJust stop. Please. It’s okay that you don’t know.
Bata
Just stop. Please. It’s okay that you don’t know.
Not a lot of footage playing pool. I get the impression he's big wave surfing at the casinos.billy? incardona? who’s that tell us more
now efren is a snooker champion too?
i see why the internet makes people so mean and angry
"Popular opinion" is meaningless and will change with the wind. The key word is "popular", which has little to do with reality. Nor does how someone may have played snooker have much to do with measuring who may be GOAT in pool.No disrespect, but seeing it live doesn’t make you an authority or make your opinion any more valid than mine. since the criteria for being the best is murky, all we can do is go by popular opinion, and I think most would say Efren was PROBABLY the better player overall
like Any sport there’s always going to be a debate on who the greatest is. Bill Russel has 11 championships, Michael Jordan has six, however hardly anyone would say bill Russel is better than MJ. i Don’t know the numbers, but I’m assuming Mike sigel has more tournamen wins than Efren and may have beaten him more in their matchups, but in my opinion and the opinion of many others Efren is the greatest of all time. So unless there’s a clear criteria on what makes someone the best, opinions absolutely matter., but it doesn’t make it a fact"Popular opinion" is meaningless and will change with the wind. The key word is "popular", which has little to do with reality. Nor does how someone may have played snooker have much to do with measuring who may be GOAT in pool.
I started this little personal project to try and come up with a way to measure, based on metrics, who may have performed the best. The extreme least common denominator for that would be to measure number of major tournaments/championships won against their peers. Yes, it is a bit pointless but fun for me regardless.
I started this little personal project to try and come up with a way to measure, based on metrics, who may have performed the best.