Gold Crown VI

Biloxi Boy

Man With A Golden Arm
Anyone bought, or played on extensively, a new Gold Crown VI? Not interested in value analysis, comparison to Diamonds, etc. Not concerned with where the parts are made or the tables assembled. I am simply trying to determine the quality of the tables themselves -- do they play or not. As always, thank you all for the benefit of your experience and knowledge.
 
Last edited:
Yeah - definitely a massive savings on the Rasson, and I really like the look of the Challenger Plus (and the Victory), but like the OP, I'd like some first hand reviews before pulling the trigger. I don't know anyone with a one - posted here a while back and there doesn't seem to be anyone on here with one either.
One thing about AZB, I have to keep reminding myself that the whole pool world is not tuned in here. Lack of response on AZB is just that.
 
As a past Brunswick devotee and owner, I can say I agree with you. As a current diamond owner, it ain't bad at all.

In pool, we constantly adjust to tables. Two side by side GCs, or Diamonds, same cloth, etc., will not play identically. I am certain I can adjust to Diamonds. I am talking about base expectations. There is no question that Diamonds are great. I just will never understand why someone would produce such a product and not conform to "industry standards". Certainly Diamond had the capability. Why create such a thing? Did it help or hurt?
 
In pool, we constantly adjust to tables. Two side by side GCs, or Diamonds, same cloth, etc., will not play identically. I am certain I can adjust to Diamonds. I am talking about base expectations. There is no question that Diamonds are great. I just will never understand why someone would produce such a product and not conform to "industry standards". Certainly Diamond had the capability. Why create such a thing? Did it help or hurt?
Just because B'wick did something their way doesn't make it a 'standard'. There were no set standards and they were the 'big dog on the block' so everyone just went with them. Everywhere i go now all you see is Diamonds so maybe they are the 'current standard'. The only place i hear complaining about D's is here on AZ by old guys(i'm 61 btw) that think what B'wick did was written in stone. Look, i love GC's and i really like the blue label D's. I do not notice all these dramatic differences talked about here.
 
In pool, we constantly adjust to tables. Two side by side GCs, or Diamonds, same cloth, etc., will not play identically. I am certain I can adjust to Diamonds. I am talking about base expectations. There is no question that Diamonds are great. I just will never understand why someone would produce such a product and not conform to "industry standards". Certainly Diamond had the capability. Why create such a thing? Did it help or hurt?
If you want to be satisfied and you have the money visit a Brunswick dealer. There you can try one out. Also ask your question in the table mechanic forum.
Spending thousands without a test ride is the recipe for regrets.
As for Diamond they set the new standard for tables.
 
I've played a few hours on the GC VI at archers new place. They play well, definitely and look good. I found the professional to play very tight with absolutely 0 chance of the ball dropping with any rail contact. The shelf felt very deep, even more so than a diamond but maybe that's just me. I found it banked differently than GC 3/4s, but didn't play long enough to really get a feel for it. The table felt more diamond like and blurred the lines between Diamond and Brunswick. The cushions felt like a Brunswick but the table played like a tight Diamond.

I'm very biased to the 4s, and prefer the way the 4s play. The 6 just felt too stingy and limiting to me but I'm also a very D player, at best. The more tired my eyes got, the more frustrating my efforts became.

Edit again: For casual play of someone who can make a ball, sometimes, it would not be a table I would want to own. True bangers would lose all interest in 20 minutes, max.
 
Last edited:
I've played a few hours on the GC VI at archers new place. They play well, definitely and look good. I found the professional to play very tight with absolutely 0 chance of the ball dropping with any rail contact. The shelf felt very deep, even more so than a diamond but maybe that's just me. I found it banked differently than GC 3/4s, but didn't play long enough to really get a feel for it.

I'm very biased to the 4s, and prefer the way the 4s play. The 6 just felt too stingy and limiting to me but I'm also a very D player, at best. The more tired my eyes got, the more frustrating my efforts became.
Good take. I doubt the shelf is deeper than a Diamond. That would have been a big change to how B'wick does things. Easy to check, just measure from the center of a line across the points back to the drop-off.
 
I've played a few hours on the GC VI at archers new place. They play well, definitely and look good. I found the professional to play very tight with absolutely 0 chance of the ball dropping with any rail contact. The shelf felt very deep, even more so than a diamond but maybe that's just me. I found it banked differently than GC 3/4s, but didn't play long enough to really get a feel for it. The table felt more diamond like and blurred the lines between Diamond and Brunswick. The cushions felt like a Brunswick but the table played like a tight Diamond.

I'm very biased to the 4s, and prefer the way the 4s play. The 6 just felt too stingy and limiting to me but I'm also a very D player, at best. The more tired my eyes got, the more frustrating my efforts became.
Do you know what cloth Archer's GCs have? I am not sure what "professional" is. There is a GC "tournament" model that offers tighter pockets. Also, I have been to the NOLA Brunswick Dist. and, while set up, the GC was surrounded by other tables (rail to rail) and not playable. I was able to reach over and feel the cloth and the cushions -- but that's it. Which brings me to this post -- I am reaching out to determine if AZB members are able to provide the info I lack.

As far as Archer's, I'll just fuel up the private jet in the a.m. and zip up for lunch and a few racks.
 
Hi,

I’ve had a GC6 Tournament Edition with Simonis 860 for about 1 yr now. I wrestled with the BW/Diamond/Rasson question like many do. In the end the desire to have a part of the Americana I grew up with in my home and a personal preference for the looks/feel of the GC drove my decision. It looks and plays great, and I’m quite happy with it. Construction & feature wise I believe it to be on par or better than GC4’s. I’ve never seen a GC5, but IMO each generation of GC made subtle improvements.

There are minor issues with fit & finish of the pocket/casting hardware, but these are truly minor. However, can be a bit psychologically annoying in context of a $10k ish premium product when compared to a new Diamond. This thread & this thread both have quite useful & detailed feedback that I think would be worth your time.

Since I started playing pool again after decades away, I have now played on a lot of different GC and Diamonds and become much more educated on table issues. As many people will tell you, if you want a BW to really be top notch then you really need to have a good/experienced table tech set it up for you. I think Diamonds design is simply better in this regard - it appears that Diamond's rail/frame design are setup to tighter tolerances at the factory and final assembly of the table is more "plug&play", doesn't require as much care and precision by the installer, which results in a product that requires less complexity to deliver and setup and final assembled fit/finish/specs are more consistent. BW appears to have more variance in their pocket sizes/angles and literally have more moving parts. Practical examples; when you order a Diamond Pro Cut - regardless of who sets it up - for the most part you will get 4.5" pockets and 141° pocket facing angles which makes for a very nice crisp pro level table that is plenty tough and perfectly within WPA specs, but order a GC6/TE and you might end up with pockets anywhere from 4.25-4.5" and 141-143° PFAs. These variances can really affect play - mine ended up with pockets in a range of 4.25-4.35" & 143-144° and it plays super, super tough, tougher than several other CG/Diamonds with much smaller mouths in the 4.0-4.25" zone. Especially on a new table with fresh rail rubber and fast cloth - its super touchy, essentially if the OB touches a rail or hits a facing with too much speed it's just not going in. I wanted a really crisp table, but it's really much more frustrating than I had intended and quite miserable for casual players.

A good analogy for the BW/Diamond thing may be comparing a 1911 pistol to a Walther or CZ. If you're shooting USPSA type stuff and want a 1911 to run really smooth and accurate, you'll need an expert to hand tune it (Les Baer, Wilson, etc) - whereas pretty much any Walther, CZ, or even Glock will just work great out of the box. I'm not a car guy, but I guess it might be also like comparing a vintage muscle car to a modern japanese sports car.

Anyway I think you'll be happy with any new GC6, but since you want the "GC to end all tables", I think you should try to nail down what you really want in terms of pocket specs (very personal decision, no "right" answer, there are other AZB threads on that, we all have our own opinions and use cases for home tables) and get in touch with a knowledgeable table tech to get their inputs and a relationship established first, before ordering the table. If you don't have one local, consider working with one of the well known ones to travel to you; it's only money :cool:

Hope this helps and good luck on your journey.
 
Last edited:
The Blue labels bank fine. I've played on a bunch of them and i don't see what people keep whining about.
As a past Brunswick devotee and owner, I can say I agree with you. As a current diamond owner, it ain't bad at all.
You know, now that I am playing on diamond without being in a tournament or matched up...

I see why all those good one pocket players shoot those 2railers like hangers.

(They) Almost are hangers on a diamond-- and almost impossible on the Brunswick
 
Hi,

I’ve had a GC6 Tournament Edition with Simonis 860 for about 1 yr now. I wrestled with the BW/Diamond/Rasson question like many do. In the end the desire to have a part of the Americana I grew up with in my home and a personal preference for the looks/feel of the GC drove my decision. It looks and plays great, and I’m quite happy with it. Construction & feature wise I believe it to be on par or better than GC4’s. I’ve never seen a GC5, but IMO each generation of GC made subtle improvements.

There are minor issues with fit & finish of the pocket/casting hardware, but these are truly minor. However, can be a bit psychologically annoying in context of a $10k ish premium product when compared to a new Diamond. This thread & this thread both have quite useful & detailed feedback that I think would be worth your time.

Since I started playing pool again after decades away, I have now played on a lot of different GC and Diamonds and become much more educated on table issues. As many people will tell you, if you want a BW to really be top notch then you really need to have a good/experienced table tech set it up for you. I think Diamonds design is simply better in this regard - it appears that Diamond's rail/frame design are setup to tighter tolerances at the factory and final assembly of the table is more "plug&play", doesn't require as much care and precision by the installer, which results in a product that requires less complexity to deliver and setup and final assembled fit/finish/specs are more consistent. BW appears to have more variance in their pocket sizes/angles and literally have more moving parts. Practical examples; when you order a Diamond Pro Cut - regardless of who sets it up - for the most part you will get 4.5" pockets and 141° pocket facing angles which makes for a very nice crisp pro level table that is plenty tough and perfectly within WPA specs, but order a GC6/TE and you might end up with pockets anywhere from 4.25-4.5" and 141-143° PFAs. These variances can really affect play - mine ended up with pockets in a range of 4.25-4.35" & 143-144° and it plays super, super tough, tougher than several other CG/Diamonds with much smaller mouths in the 4.0-4.25" zone. Especially on a new table with fresh rail rubber and fast cloth - its super touchy, essentially if the OB touches a rail or hits a facing with too much speed it's just not going in. I wanted a really crisp table, but it's really much more frustrating than I had intended and quite miserable for casual players.

A good analogy for the BW/Diamond thing may be comparing a 1911 pistol to a Walther or CZ. If you're shooting USPSA type stuff and want a 1911 to run really smooth and accurate, you'll need an expert to hand tune it (Les Baer, Wilson, etc) - whereas pretty much any Walther, CZ, or even Glock will just work great out of the box. I'm not a car guy, but I guess it might be also like comparing a vintage muscle car to a modern japanese sports car.

Anyway I think you'll be happy with any new GC6, but since you want the "GC to end all tables", I think you should try to nail down what you really want in terms of pocket specs (very personal decision, no "right" answer, there are other AZB threads on that, we all have our own opinions and use cases for home tables) and get in touch with a knowledgeable table tech to get their inputs and a relationship established first, before ordering the table. If you don't have one local, consider working with one of the well known ones to travel to you; it's only money :cool:

Hope this helps and good luck on your journey.
It doesn't get any better than that. Excellent write up, sir!
 
It doesn't get any better than that. Excellent write up, sir!
Cheers brother, I learned a lot from your posts and others, so felt I should try to contribute a bit as well. Seems we’re generally a pretty small, nutty, aggressive community of artists & ego maniacs, but hopefully we can help each other out on these practical & spendy hardware issues.

✌️
 
Last edited:
Hi,

I’ve had a GC6 Tournament Edition with Simonis 860 for about 1 yr now. I wrestled with the BW/Diamond/Rasson question like many do. In the end the desire to have a part of the Americana I grew up with in my home and a personal preference for the looks/feel of the GC drove my decision. It looks and plays great, and I’m quite happy with it. Construction & feature wise I believe it to be on par or better than GC4’s. I’ve never seen a GC5, but IMO each generation of GC made subtle improvements.

There are minor issues with fit & finish of the pocket/casting hardware, but these are truly minor. However, can be a bit psychologically annoying in context of a $10k ish premium product when compared to a new Diamond. This thread & this thread both have quite useful & detailed feedback that I think would be worth your time.

Since I started playing pool again after decades away, I have now played on a lot of different GC and Diamonds and become much more educated on table issues. As many people will tell you, if you want a BW to really be top notch then you really need to have a good/experienced table tech set it up for you. I think Diamonds design is simply better in this regard - it appears that Diamond's rail/frame design are setup to tighter tolerances at the factory and final assembly of the table is more "plug&play", doesn't require as much care and precision by the installer, which results in a product that requires less complexity to deliver and setup and final assembled fit/finish/specs are more consistent. BW appears to have more variance in their pocket sizes/angles and literally have more moving parts. Practical examples; when you order a Diamond Pro Cut - regardless of who sets it up - for the most part you will get 4.5" pockets and 141° pocket facing angles which makes for a very nice crisp pro level table that is plenty tough and perfectly within WPA specs, but order a GC6/TE and you might end up with pockets anywhere from 4.25-4.5" and 141-143° PFAs. These variances can really affect play - mine ended up with pockets in a range of 4.25-4.35" & 143-144° and it plays super, super tough, tougher than several other CG/Diamonds with much smaller mouths in the 4.0-4.25" zone. Especially on a new table with fresh rail rubber and fast cloth - its super touchy, essentially if the OB touches a rail or hits a facing with too much speed it's just not going in. I wanted a really crisp table, but it's really much more frustrating than I had intended and quite miserable for casual players.

A good analogy for the BW/Diamond thing may be comparing a 1911 pistol to a Walther or CZ. If you're shooting USPSA type stuff and want a 1911 to run really smooth and accurate, you'll need an expert to hand tune it (Les Baer, Wilson, etc) - whereas pretty much any Walther, CZ, or even Glock will just work great out of the box. I'm not a car guy, but I guess it might be also like comparing a vintage muscle car to a modern japanese sports car.

Anyway I think you'll be happy with any new GC6, but since you want the "GC to end all tables", I think you should try to nail down what you really want in terms of pocket specs (very personal decision, no "right" answer, there are other AZB threads on that, we all have our own opinions and use cases for home tables) and get in touch with a knowledgeable table tech to get their inputs and a relationship established first, before ordering the table. If you don't have one local, consider working with one of the well known ones to travel to you; it's only money :cool:

Hope this helps and good luck on your journey.
Thank you very much!
 
In an area rife with uncertainty, I am quite certain that a capable table mechanic is the key to success. I love where I live, but living in paradise does exact a price when it comes to some things that you cats on the other two coasts take for granted. I am certain that, sooner or later, I am going to find a jam up mechanic, but I am having to shake some trees to find him, or her. No doubt I will have to pay someone to travel, but I am certainly prepared to foot the bill for what I need. On the other hand, as lagniappe, my job will have all the boat fresh shrimp one can stand.
 
Back
Top