who won the tourney?
how much did it pay?
Frost did and I believe it was $2700. Expenses were probably around $1000 I would guess so if you did not finish top 3 you did not make anything I am guessing.
who won the tourney?
how much did it pay?
the caspers event was advertised all along as 5,000 with 32 players. Bad weather, timing etc. When only 18 players show up, the venue is screwed.
I like adding so much per player.
5,000/32= 156.25 per player added or even 150 per player added.
With 2,500 added for 18 it only comes to 138 added per player. Still good, but there was no guarantee posted for less than 32. That's the scary part, imo. Caspers still added a fair amount.
Bottom line is this. In this economy, it's a great thing to have venues like caspers willing to put the money out there. I would like to see more consistency in the added with all events.
Ray
The Caspers event was advertised all along as 5,000 with 32 players. Bad weather, timing etc. When only 18 players show up, the venue is screwed.
I like adding so much per player.
5,000/32= 156.25 per player added or even 150 per player added.
With 2,500 added for 18 it only comes to 138 added per player. Still good, but there was no guarantee posted for less than 32. That's the scary part, imo. Caspers still added a fair amount.
Bottom line is this. In this economy, it's a great thing to have venues like Caspers willing to put the money out there. I would like to see more consistency in the added with all events.
Ray
again limtied to 64 so if u wanna play lets make it happen...5000 added with 32 players...(already done) we are also tryin to get more added money...sign up sign up sign up....
I think there need to be truth in advertising, and the terms of the added money added needs to be spelled out in black & White.
. So I went home, and never returned to this Bar to play in a tournament again. It was my regular Tuesday night place to play for over 2 years, where I very rarely missed a week of there tournament. I did not go there for over 18 months, played a couple of Tuesday nights in the 110 degree summer heat, the heat was too much in the bar, and in the end the place closed!
I-35 between OKC and Dallas closed about 4 times because of wrecks on the ice from last weds to saturday and Dallas highways were pretty rough too from what i saw on the news.
Actually this is not true and your wrong. Here is the threads advertising the tournament.
http://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?t=209907
http://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?t=209512
Doesn't guaranteed mean, no matter what?
If it's not guaranteed then they shouldn't say guaranteed.
Seems pretty simple to me.
Yeah, Putuporshutup botched the announcement. The Guarantee was with 32 players. When he finally did mention it on Jan 4th, he said they already had 32.
Ray
doesn't guaranteed mean, no matter what?
If it's not guaranteed then they shouldn't say guaranteed.
Seems pretty simple to me.
Lenny,
First you might want to define what "added money" really is.
You have an event where you have a $100 entry fee, no greens fees, a $25 per player registration fee and the promoter "adds" $500. There are 50 players at the event. There should be $4250 in prize money available to the players. My question is, did the promoter really add the $500 or did the players add it from their entry fee or registration fee? In my view, the players added the money. [...]
OK I can explain.
I am an example of someone you might consider taking with the left hand while giving with the right hand. But there is a rhyme and reason to it.
For our summer shootout coming up in June, we have an 8-ball tournament:
We advertise it as,
$2500 added
$60 entry (includes $10 green fee)
This means there is $50 from each entry in the prize fund and $2500 on top of that.
You might say that if I get 100 players, thus generating $1000 in green fees, am I not REALLY just adding $1500?
I say the answer is no. There is a subtlety here, and the subtlety stems from the PURPOSE of advertising added money.
The added money is a "players' insurance policy." There is always a risk that turnout is poor, whether it's because of lack of interest, weather, competing events, of any of a number of other reasons. Without added money, low turnout means paultry prize fund. A player that commits to a tournament without added money is assuming the risk that nobody will show up. Added money shifts that risk to the promoter, i.e., takes it away from the player.
So for our summer shootout, if ONE player shows up, We would use a two-player double elimination bracket with one bye ;-), and the payout to that one player would be $2550.
If 8 players show up, the payout is $400 + $2500 = $2900
If 128 players show up, the payout is $6400 + $2500 = $8900
In other words, the added money is a much more important part of the prize fund when the turnout is low.
By the way, we don't make money running our big tournaments. Our goal is to run great events while losing a palatable amount.
So no, the $10 green fee is not really feeding that $2500. That $2500 is always there, and the $50 per player is added to it.
It should go as advertised, period!!! If you advertise 'guarantee' in your prize money, no matter if two or two hundred show up, the advertised 'guaranteed' amount should be added. If you were reliant on the entry fees to bulk up the 'guarantee', then dont advertise 'guarantee'. Advertise 'the truth': _____ added based on ____ players. Then noone will be disappointed. People use this ploy to bait players just like commercials do. It's not a good look!! This is why you have all the negative discussion. Stop it!! Keep it real, son!
PEACE
WUTANG