crawfish said:
Who'd play Poker for free? Gambling hasn't hurt pool, the players have hurt pool. Attitude, attitude, attitude. Splitting, dumping, whining, laying down, all have hurt pool. Money is involved, here.
It's always a chicken-and-egg thingie. I don't think it's the players themselves at all. In fact, I place the blame squarely on the pool industry. The same payouts exist in 2007 as in 1977, and what's going on with the Billiard Congress of
AMERICA? The pool players can only play with the hand they are dealt.
As American pool players continue to wander in a wilderness that is more and more becoming inhabited by players from around the world, they will eventually become extinct.
When the existing tournament trail on American soil dries up, a new one will replace it, only it will be located overseas.
Gambling may become some American players only shot at survival because today's tournament trail is not cost effective. Even when you win, you may have accounts payable to satisfy from previous events.
This is especially true for unsponsored players. I can count sponsored players in the States on one hand, and by sponsored, I mean sponsored by having their travel, lodging, and entry fees paid for, and then there's the fortunate few who get a monthly stipend.
Gambling has been, is today, and will be in the future some pool players key to survival, and may have better odds at winning than being a tournament soldier in today's pool world, when you take into account the associated expenses. JMHO, FWIW!
JAM